Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2024-06-10
Type A 10 Appeals Taxation
Docket 22 entries
Disposition judgment by stipulation before trial commenced

Parties

Plaintiff The Stop & Shop Supermarket Company Llc
Defendant City Of Norwalk

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. JUDGMENT BY STIPULATION BEFORE TRIAL COMMENCED RESULT: HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  2. SUMMONS
  3. COMPLAINT
  4. RETURN OF SERVICE
  5. MOTION FOR DEFAULT -FAILURE TO APPEAR PB 17-20 RESULT: Denied 7/2/2024 BY THE CLERK
  6. ORDER RESULT: Denied 7/2/2024 BY THE CLERK
  7. MOTION TO TRANSFER RESULT: Granted 7/8/2024 HON SHEILA OZALIS
  8. ORDER RESULT: Granted 7/8/2024 HON SHEILA OZALIS
  9. TRANSFERRED FROM SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK
  10. TRANSFERRED TO SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN
  11. MOTION FOR DEFAULT-FAILURE TO PLEAD RESULT: Denied 7/31/2024 BY THE CLERK
  12. ORDER RESULT: Denied 7/31/2024 BY THE CLERK
  13. ANSWER
  14. CERTIFICATE OF CLOSED PLEADINGS AND CLAIM FOR TRIAL LIST
  15. OBJECTION TO INTERROGATORIES/PRODUCTION PB 13-8 and 13-10 Plaintiff's Objections to Defendant's Interrogatories and Requests for Production
  16. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Motion for Extension of Time to File Appraisal RESULT: Granted 10/7/2024 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  17. ORDER RESULT: Granted 10/7/2024 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  18. NOTICE Notice of Filing Appraisal
  19. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE of Pretrial scheduled for 01/13/2025 RESULT: Granted 1/7/2025 HON HENRY COHN
  20. ORDER RESULT: Granted 1/7/2025 HON HENRY COHN
  21. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH STIPULATION RESULT: Granted 3/18/2025 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  22. ORDER RESULT: Granted 3/18/2025 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.