Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2024-04-19
Type A 10 Appeals Taxation
Docket 25 entries
Disposition judgment by stipulation before trial commenced

Parties

Plaintiff 38 A Grove Street, Llc|Odin 38 A Grove, Llc
Defendant Town Of Ridgefield

Docket Entries

  1. JUDGMENT BY STIPULATION BEFORE TRIAL COMMENCED RESULT: HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  2. APPEARANCE Appearance
  3. SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT
  4. RETURN OF SERVICE
  5. REQUEST TO CONFORM CASE INITIATION DATA ENTRY TO SUMMONS (JD-CL-96)
  6. MOTION TO TRANSFER RESULT: Granted 7/15/2024 HON DAN SHABAN
  7. ORDER RESULT: Granted 7/15/2024 HON DAN SHABAN
  8. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
  9. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) RESULT: Granted 7/15/2024 HON DAN SHABAN
  10. ORDER RESULT: Granted 7/15/2024 HON DAN SHABAN
  11. TRANSFERRED FROM SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY
  12. TRANSFERRED TO SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN
  13. MOTION FOR NONSUIT FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ORDER
  14. DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS
  15. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE
  16. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE of pretrial 4/29/25 RESULT: Granted 4/24/2025 HON HENRY COHN
  17. ORDER RESULT: Granted 4/24/2025 HON HENRY COHN
  18. OFFER OF COMPROMISE
  19. MOTION TO CITE ADDITIONAL PARTY Motion to Add Party Plaintiff RESULT: Granted 10/7/2025 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  20. ORDER RESULT: Granted 10/7/2025 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  21. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116)
  22. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH STIPULATION
  23. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH STIPULATION Motion and Stipulation
  24. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH STIPULATION REVISED RESULT: Granted 10/8/2025 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  25. ORDER RESULT: Granted 10/8/2025 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.