Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Travis County

Court

Travis County

Texas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-07-11
Status Closed
Type Malpractice Medical
Docket 26 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Grimmer, Andrew
Defendant Austin Urology Institute, P.a.
Photo of Hon. 353 Rd, District Court

Judge

Hon. 353 Rd, District Court

Travis County

Texas

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. FINAL OR PARTIAL DISPOSITION ORDER PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF NON-SUIT WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANTS KOUSHIK K. SHAW, M.D. AND AUSTIN UROLOGY INSTITUTE, P.A. Party: Plaintiff GRIMMER, ANDREW; Plaintiff GRIMMER, SANDI
  3. EXECUTED SERVICE EXECUTED CITATION - AUSTIN UROLOGY INSTITUTE, P.A.
  5. EXECUTED SERVICE EXECUTED CITATION - KOUSHIK K. SHAW, MD Party: Defendant SHAW, KOUSHIK K. MD
  7. ORIGINAL ANSWER/WAIVER DEFENDANTS ORIGINAL ANSWER Party: Defendant AUSTIN UROLOGY INSTITUTE, P.A.; Defendant SHAW, KOUSHIK K. MD
  9. ORIGINAL ANSWER/WAIVER DEFENDANT JEANETTE VARELA, FNP-C S ORIGINAL ANSWER
  11. OTHER/NOTICE NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS HEBV PRIVACY OFFICE
  13. OTHER/NOTICE PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF SERVING CH. 74 EXPERT REPORT AND CURRICULUM VITAE Party: Plaintiff GRIMMER, ANDREW; Plaintiff GRIMMER, SANDI
  15. OTHER/NOTICE NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS Party: Defendant AUSTIN UROLOGY INSTITUTE, P.A.; Defendant SHAW, KOUSHIK K. MD
  17. OTHER/NOTICE REGARDING DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS HEB
  19. MOTION AGREED MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT JEANETTE VARELA, FNP-C
  20. OTHER/NOTICE REPORTER'S CERTIFICATION VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF MR. ANDREW T. GRIMMER MARCH 13, 2025 (REPORTED REMOTELY)
  21. OTHER/NOTICE RULE 203 REPORTER CERTIFICATE SANDI GRIMMER
  22. ORDER (Judicial Officer: PHILLIPS, J DAVID) ORDER GRANTING AGREED MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT JEANETTE VARELA, FNP-C
  23. RESPONSE DEFENDANT JEANETTE VARELA, FNP-C S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF LEVEL 3 DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN, FIRST AMENDED ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, RULE 193.7 NOTICE AND JURY DEMAND
  24. OTHER/NOTICE NOTICE OF ORDER
  25. FINAL OR PARTIAL DISPOSITION ORDER NOTICE OF NON-SUIT WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT JEANETTE VARELA, FNP-C Party: Plaintiff GRIMMER, ANDREW; Plaintiff GRIMMER, SANDI
  26. CVD: DISMISSAL/NONSUIT (OCA)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more