Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2024-07-11
Type Quiet Title
Docket 54 entries
Disposition remov

Parties

Plaintiff Molnar, Carol
Defendant Castillo, Barbara
Photo of Hon. JENNIFER D. TOWELL

Judge

Hon. JENNIFER D. TOWELL

Summit County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS ISSUED BY FEDEX CASTILLO, BARBARA L.
  2. CIVIL COMPLAINT FILED
  3. DURING THE PENDENCY OF THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED MATTER, AND TO KEEP THE STATUS QUO BETWEEN THE PARTIES AND THE RESPECTIVE PROPERTIES IN QUESTION, IT IS AGREED THAT THE MOLNARS AND/OR BOUGHNERS WILL REMOVE ANY AND ALL DRIVEWAY STAKES THAT ARE DE-MARKING A PROPERTY LINE AND NOT A DRIVEWAY LINE; THE DRIVEWAY STAKING SHALL BE RESERVED EXCLUSIVELY FOR SNOWPLOWING PURPOSES AND WILL BE REMOVED ONCE SNOWPLOWING IS NO LONGER NECESSARY DUE TO APPROPRIATE WEATHER CONDITIONS; THE MOLNARS MAY USE THE CASTILLO SIDE OF THE PROPERTY TO TEMPORARILY PARK A VEHICLE FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE OF PICKING UP AND/OR DROPPING OFF A CHILD AT THE BUS STOP, PROVIDED THAT THE SHARED DRIVEWAY REMAINS UNOBSTRUCTED FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS; ANY PAVERS ON THE CASTILLO'S SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, THAT WERE PLACED THERE BY EITHER MR. OR MRS. BOUGHNER, WILL BE REMOVED TO ACCOMMODATE PARKING; AND NO VERBAL, PHYSICAL, OR ANY OTHER FORM OF HARASSMENT SHALL OCCUR BETWEEN THE PARTIES DURING THE PENDENCY OF THIS CASE. MAGISTRATE TRISTAN R. SERRI
  4. TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 12, 2025 AT 2:00 P.M. SEE ORDER FOR CONFERENCE NUMBER. JDT
  5. THE ORDER DOCKETED ON FEBRUARY 19, 2025 IS HEREBY STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD. THE PARTIES ARE HEREBY ORDERED TO FILE A PROPOSED CONSENT AGREEMENT OUTLINING THEIR AGREEMENT, ON OR BEFORE MARCH 7, 2025. MAGISTRATE TRISTAN R. SERRI
  6. * STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD* BY AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES IN THIS MATTER AND MEMORIALIZED IN THE CONSENT ENTRY FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY ORDERS, THIS COURT ADOPTS THE FOLLOWING: 1) BY AGREEMENT AND CONSENT OF THE PARTIES, THE STAKES PLACED IN THE GROUND FOR SNOW PLOWING THAT DO NOT SPECIFICALLY MARK THE SHARE DRIVEWAY WILL BE REMOVED BY PLAINTIFFS AND, AT THE END OF SNOW PLOWING SEASON. PLAINTIFFS WILL REMOVE ALL STAKES LINING THE SHARED DRIVEWAY IN THEIR ENTIRETY 2) BY AGREEMENT AND CONSENT OF THE PARTIES, PLAINTIFFS WILL REMOVE THE PAVER BRICKS PILED AT/NEAR THE END OF THE DRIVEWAY WHERE THEY WERE PLACED BY PLAINTIFFS. 3) BY AGREEMENT AND CONSENT OF THE PARTIES, PLAINTIFFS WILL BE ALLOWED TO PARK IN THE YARD AT THE END OF THE SHARED DRIVEWAY FOR PICK-UP AND DROP-OFF OF CHILDREN BY THE SCHOOL BUS. 4) BY AGREEMENT AND CONSENT OF THE PARTIES, THERE WILL BE NO CONTACT BETWEEN THE PARTIES DURING THE PENDENCY OF LITIGATION. BY AGREEMENT AND CONSENT OF THE PARTIES, THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE IN EFFECT IMMEDIATELY AND SHALL REMAIN IN EFFECT DURING THE TERM OF THIS LITIGATION. JDT
  7. CONSENT ENTRY FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY ORDERS.
  8. MAGISTRATE'S ORDER. THE PARTIES ARE HEREBY ORDERED TO FILE A PROPOSED CONSENT AGREEMENT OUTLINING THEIR AGREEMENT ON OR BEFORE FEBRUARY 10, 2025. MAGISTRATE TRISTAN R. SERRI
  9. MOTION TO ALLOW WITNESS TO TESTIFY VIA ZOOM AT PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING OF JANUARY 31, 2025
  10. MAGISTRATE ASSIGNMENT. IT IS ORDERED THAT THE MATTERS AND ISSUES IN THIS CASE BE ASSIGNED TO THE GENERAL DIVISION, COMMON PLEAS COURT MAGISTRATE, TRISTAN R. SERRI8 FOR RESOLUTION AND DISPOSITION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY ODER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (LOCAL RULE 8) WILL BE HELD BEFORE MAGISTRATE TRISTAN R. SERRI ON JANUARY 31, 2025 AT 1:00 P.M. IN THE COURTROOM FOR JENNIFER D. TOWELL.
  11. A HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION IS SCHEDULED FOR THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE FOR JANUARY 31, 2025 AT 1:00 P.M. JDT
  12. FINAL PRETRIAL IS SCHEDULED FOR FEBRUARY 4, 2026 AT 9:30 A.M. A TRIAL DATE IS SET FOR MARCH 3, 2026 AT 9:00 A.M. JDT
  13. DISCOVERY REQUESTS
  14. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
  15. NEW PARTY THIRD PARTY'S ANSWER TO THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIM - MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ
  16. NEW PARTY THIRD PARTY'S ANSWER TO THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIM - JENELLE JORDAN
  17. THE THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. JDT
  18. RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS
  19. NEW PARTY THIRD PARTY'S ANSWER TO THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS' COUNTERLCAIM
  20. 3P DEFENDANT, MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ'S MOTION TO DISMISS
  21. THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT, JORDAN'S, MOTION TO DISMISS
  22. A TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 24, 2025 AT 10:00 A.M. PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR CONFERENCE NUMBER. JDT
  23. TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 6, 2024 IS HEREBY RESCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 8, 2024 AT 10:00 A.M. COUNSEL SHALL CALL THE COURT'S CONFERENCE BRIDGE AT 330-926-2552 AND ENTER CONFERENCE ROOM NUMBER 53111 WHEN PROMPTED, TO JOIN THE CONFERENCE CALL. JDT
  24. LEAVE TO PLEAD
  25. LEAVE TO PLEAD
  26. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ATTORNEYS ANDREW J. WIDES AND LAWRENCE J. SPOLJARIC JR AS COUNSEL FOR THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS STEPHANIE AND MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ
  27. LEAVE TO PLEAD
  28. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ATTONREYS ANDREW J WIDES AND LAWRENCE J SPOLJARIC JR AS COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANT JENELLE JORDAN
  29. A TELEPHONE STATUS CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED IN THIS MATTER ON NOVEMBER 6, 2024 AT 11:30 A.M. JDT
  30. Certified Mail Service - Served JENELLE JORDAN
  31. Certified Mail Service - Served MIGUEL RODRIQUEZ
  32. FedEx Service - Served JENELLE JORDAN
  33. FedEx Service - Served STEPHANIE RODRIQUEZ
  34. FedEx Service - Served MIGUEL RODRIQUEZ
  35. ANSWER COUNTERCLAIM THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT SUMMONS BY FEDEX RODRIQUEZ, STEPHANIE
  36. ANSWER COUNTERCLAIM THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT SUMMONS BY FEDEX RODRIQUEZ, MIGUEL
  37. ANSWER COUNTERCLAIM THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT SUMMONS BY FEDEX JORDAN, JENELLE
  38. ANSWER COUNTERCLAIM THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT SUMMONS BY Certified Mail RODRIQUEZ, STEPHANIE
  39. ANSWER COUNTERCLAIM THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT SUMMONS BY Certified Mail RODRIQUEZ, MIGUEL
  40. ANSWER COUNTERCLAIM THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT SUMMONS BY Certified Mail JORDAN, JENELLE
  41. ANSWER COUNTERCLAIM THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT SUMMONS
  42. INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK FOR SERVICE
  43. Certified Mail Service - Served BRIAN BOUGHNER
  44. Certified Mail Service - Served ALEXANDRIA BOUGHNER
  45. ANSWER COUNTERCLAIM THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT SUMMONS BY Certified Mail BOUGHNER, BRIAN
  46. ANSWER COUNTERCLAIM THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT SUMMONS BY Certified Mail BOUGHNER, ALEXANDRIA
  47. ANSWER, COUNTERCLAIM AND THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT
  48. EX A. TO COUNTERCLAIM/3P COMPLAINT_REINBOLD JE
  49. INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE OF 3P COMPLAINT
  50. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ATTONREYS ANDREW J WIDES AND LAWRENCE J SPOLJARIC JR AS COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANT BARBARA L CASTILLO
  51. NOTICE OF DEFENDANT'S CERTIFICATION OF FIRST LEAVE TO PLEAD
  52. FedEx Service - Served BARBARA L. CASTILLO
  53. SUMMONS ISSUED BY FEDEX CASTILLO, BARBARA L.
  54. CIVIL COMPLAINT FILED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.