Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Southern Appellate Court

Court

Missouri Southern Appellate Court

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-06-25
Type Ap Writ Of Prohibition
Docket 29 entries
Disposition writ denied

Docket Entries

  1. xhibits Returned Exhibits picked up by C. Woods on behalf of attorney Bryan Fisher.
  2. ranted Exhibit "G" will be held in the Clerk's office of the Southern District Court of Appeals and may be picked up by respondent any time during normal business hours. Associated Entries: 07/25/2024 - Other Motion +
  3. ote to Clerk eFiling Filed By: BRYAN DANE FISHER
  4. ther Motion Motion to Withdraw Exhibit; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: BRYAN DANE FISHER On Behalf Of: DEREK ADAM ANKROM, DEREK ADAM ANKROM Associated Entries: 07/26/2024 - Granted +
  5. isposed- Pet for Writ Denied
  6. enied Associated Entries: 06/25/2024 - Writ Filed in MO Ct of Appeals +
  7. rits Quashed
  8. xhibits Deposited Exhibit G to Respondent's Suggestions in Opposition deposited July 15, 2024, in the above cause. Exhibit placed in the Exhibit Room. Filed By: BRYAN DANE FISHER
  9. ote to Clerk eFiling Filed By: BRYAN DANE FISHER
  10. uggestions in Opposition Suggestions in Opposition to Relators Petition for Writ of Prohibition; Ex A Docket Sheet; Ex B 1st Mot to Compel; Ex C Judgment 4.25.23; Ex D 2nd Mot to Compel; Ex E Judgment 6.2.23; Ex F 3rd Mot to Compel; Ex G audio log sheet; Ex H App for ind criminal contempt; Ex I Notice of ineligibility; Ex J appt prosecutors SIO to Not of ineligibility; Ex K Notice of Determination of Indigence; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: BRYAN DANE FISHER On Behalf Of: DEREK ADAM ANKROM, DEREK ADAM ANKROM
  11. ranted Until Amended order granting ext for suggestions showing corrected date Associated Entries: 07/08/2024 - Mot Ext Time- File Sugg/Opp +
  12. ranted Until July 15, 2024 Associated Entries: 07/08/2024 - Mot Ext Time- File Sugg/Opp +
  13. ot Ext Time- File Sugg/Opp Motion for Extension of Time to File Suggestions in Response to Relators Petition for Writ of Prohibition; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: BRYAN DANE FISHER On Behalf Of: DEREK ADAM ANKROM, DEREK ADAM ANKROM Associated Entries: 07/08/2024 - Granted Until + Associated Entries: 07/10/2024 - Granted Until +
  14. top Order Issued Now on this day, the Court takes up relator's petition for writ of prohibition. Having fully considered the same, the Court, pursuant to Rule 84.24(e) and (i) and for the reasons stated therein, hereby dispenses with the Court's normal procedure in writ cases. Further, the Court hereby orders respondent, the Honorable Derek Ankrom, to file written suggestions on or before July 8, 2024, showing cause why this Court should not issue its preliminary writ based upon the allegations contained in relator's petition. Additionally, the Court hereby orders that no further action shall be taken in the contempt proceedings in Greene County Case No. 2231-CC00086-01 until this Court otherwise orders.
  15. cknowledgement Letter Sent
  16. ranted Associated Entries: 06/25/2024 - Mot to Proc in Forma Pauperis +
  17. lerk Remark Case assigned to division comprising Judges Sheffield, Goodman, and Borthwick.
  18. ivision Assigned
  19. o Filing Fee Due
  20. ote to Clerk eFiling Filed By: MARY DAMES FOX
  21. edacted Info Flng Sheet Filed CRIF Sheet; Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; Form 16 - Sumary for Original Remedial Writs; Petition for Writ of Prohibition; Suggestions in Support of Petition for Writ of Prohibition; Notice of Exhibits; Certificate of Service in associated to Other Filing filed on 06/25/2024. Filed By: MARY DAMES FOX On Behalf Of: MISSOURI STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER Associated Entries: 06/25/2024 - Filing +
  22. iling Certificate of Service. Filed By: MARY DAMES FOX On Behalf Of: MISSOURI STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER Associated Entries: 06/25/2024 - Redacted Info Flng Sheet Filed +
  23. xhibits Filed Index of Exhibits - part 4. Filed By: MARY DAMES FOX On Behalf Of: MISSOURI STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER
  24. iling Info Sheet eFiling Filed By: MARY DAMES FOX
  25. ote to Clerk eFiling Filed By: MARY DAMES FOX
  26. xhibits Filed Index of Exhibits-part 1; Index of Exhibits-part 2; Index of Exhibits-part 3. Filed By: MARY DAMES FOX On Behalf Of: MISSOURI STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER
  27. uggestions in Support Suggestions in Support of Petition for Writ of Prohibition. Filed By: MARY DAMES FOX On Behalf Of: MISSOURI STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER
  28. rit Filed in MO Ct of Appeals Petition for Writ of Prohibition. Filed By: MARY DAMES FOX On Behalf Of: MISSOURI STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER Associated Entries: 07/18/2024 - Denied
  29. rit Summary Filed Form 16 - Summary for Original Remedial Writs. Filed By: MARY DAMES FOX On Behalf Of: MISSOURI STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more