Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Waterbury County

Court

Waterbury County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-05-29
Type T 40 Torts Assault And Battery
Docket 66 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Ryan Heinz|Jeffrey Heinz
Defendant Raul Eliah Valle|Raul Valle Sr|Non Appearing|Clara Suarez|Tyler Dasilva|William Dasilva|Amy Dasilva|Jack Snyder|Christopher Snyder|Tracy Rabe Snyder|William Singewald|Sheldon Singewald|Denise Marini Singewald|Keenan Fraczek|Brennan Fraczek|Joanna Fraczek|Dimitrios Arfanis|Irene Manalis

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. ADDITIONAL PARTIES PAGE
  4. APPEARANCE Appearance
  5. APPEARANCE Appearance
  6. APPEARANCE Appearance
  7. APPEARANCE Appearance
  8. APPEARANCE Appearance
  9. APPEARANCE Appearance
  10. APPEARANCE Appearance
  11. RETURN OF SERVICE
  12. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD BY DEFENDANTS DIMITRIOS ARFANIS AND IRENE MANALIS RESULT: Granted 6/25/2024 HON JOHN RILEY
  13. ORDER RESULT: Granted 6/25/2024 HON JOHN RILEY
  14. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 7/6/2024 HON JOHN RILEY
  15. ORDER RESULT: Granted 7/6/2024 HON JOHN RILEY
  16. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
  17. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 7/6/2024 HON JOHN RILEY
  18. ORDER RESULT: Granted 7/6/2024 HON JOHN RILEY
  19. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD
  20. NOTICE Notice of Service of Interrogatories to Plaintiff Ryan Heinz
  21. NOTICE Notice of Service of Interrogatories to Plaintiff Jeffrey Heinz
  22. MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
  23. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD as to DaSilva defendants
  24. ORDER Transfer to Complex Litigation Docket RESULT: Order 7/10/2024 HON BARBARA BELLIS
  25. TRANSFERRED FROM SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD (PRE 1/1/24)/BRIDGEPORT (POST 1/1/24)
  26. TRANSFERRED TO SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY
  27. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD
  28. RANSFERRED FROM SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD (PRE 1/1/24)/BRIDGEPORT (POST 1/1/24)
  29. RANSFERRED TO SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY
  30. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD
  31. OTICE Def Singewalds' Notice of Service of Discovery to Plaintiff
  32. RDER General Case Management Order RESULT: Order 7/23/2024 BY THE CLERK
  33. OTICE Notice of Discovery (Heinz)
  34. OTICE Notice of Discovery to Plaintiff (Teele)
  35. OTICE Notice of Discovery to Plaintiff (Connery)
  36. OTICE Notice of Discovery to Plainitff (McGrath)
  37. OTICE Notice of Withdrawal of Discovery (McGrath) (filed in wrong case)
  38. OTICE Notice of Withdrawal of Discovery (Connery) (filed in wrong case)
  39. OTICE Notice of Withdrawal of Discovery (Teele) (filed in wrong case)
  40. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD Defendants Fraczeks Motion for Further Extension of Time to Plead RESULT: Order 8/16/2024 HON W PIERSON
  41. RDER RESULT: Order 8/16/2024 HON W PIERSON
  42. EQUEST FOR ADJUDICATION COMPLEX LITIGATION (JD-CL-77)
  43. OTION TO CONSOLIDATE
  44. EQUEST TO REVISE
  45. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Def Singewalds' Motion for Further Ext of Time to Plead
  46. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13
  47. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants' Request to Revise with Consent RESULT: Granted 12/9/2024 HON ROBIN WILSON
  48. RDER RESULT: Granted 12/9/2024 HON ROBIN WILSON
  49. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD As to the Defendants, the DaSilvas
  50. EQUEST FOR ADJUDICATION COMPLEX LITIGATION (JD-CL-77) By Defendants Singewald (on Heinz)
  51. NSWER TO COMPLAINT BY DEFENDANTS DIMITRIOS ARFANIS AND IRENE MANALIS
  52. RDER Discovery due 2/4/25 RESULT: Order 10/10/2024 HON ROBIN WILSON
  53. EQUEST TO REVISE
  54. EQUEST FOR ADJUDICATION COMPLEX LITIGATION (JD-CL-77) RE: 129.00
  55. BJECTION TO REQUEST TO REVISE Plaintiff's Objection to Defendants' Request to Revise Dated 9/10/24
  56. BJECTION TO REQUEST TO REVISE Plaintiffs' Objection to Defendants' Request to Revise Dated 11-14-24
  57. RDER remtoe status conference 1/7/25 11:30 RESULT: Order 12/9/2024 HON ROBIN WILSON
  58. OTION FOR ORDER
  59. OTION FOR ORDER Defendants Fraczeks Motion for Order of Nonsuit Re: Interrogatories and Requests for Production
  60. OTICE Notice of Filing Objections to Clara Suarez's Nonstandard Discovery Requests
  61. BJECTION TO INTERROGATORIES/PRODUCTION PB 13-8 and 13-10 Plaintiff's Objections to Clara Suarez's Nonstandard Discovery
  62. OTICE Ryan Heinz's Notice of Filing Objections to the DaSilva Defendants' Nonstandard Discovery Requests
  63. BJECTION TO INTERROGATORIES/PRODUCTION PB 13-8 and 13-10 Ryan Heinz's Objections to the DaSilva Defendants' Nonstandard Discovery Requests
  64. OTICE Of Service of Discovery-Ryan Heinz
  65. OTICE Of Service of Discovery-Jeffrey Heinz
  66. EPLY Def Singewalds' Reply to Objection to Request to Revise

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more