Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Waterbury County

Court

Waterbury County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-06-12
Type T 40 Torts Assault And Battery
Docket 50 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Faison Teele
Defendant Raul Eliah Valle|Raul Valle Sr|Non Appearing|Clara Suarez|Tyler Dasilva|William Dasilva|Amy Dasilva|Jack Snyder|Christopher Snyder|Tracy Rabe Snyder|William Singewald|Sheldon Singewald|Denise Marini Singewald|Keenan Fraczek|Brennan Fraczek|Joanna Fraczek|Dimitrios Arfanis|Irene Manalis

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. ADDITIONAL PARTIES PAGE
  4. APPEARANCE Appearance
  5. APPEARANCE Appearance
  6. APPEARANCE Appearance
  7. APPEARANCE
  8. APPEARANCE Appearance
  9. APPEARANCE Appearance
  10. APPEARANCE Appearance
  11. APPEARANCE Appearance
  12. RETURN OF SERVICE
  13. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD
  14. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD
  15. PRESIDING JUDGE REFERRAL TO COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET
  16. ORDER RESULT: Order 7/9/2024 HON BARBARA BELLIS
  17. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD
  18. NOTICE Notice of Service of Interrogatories to Plaintiff Faison Teele
  19. MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
  20. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD as to DaSilva defendants
  21. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
  22. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD
  23. TRANSFERRED FROM SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD (PRE 1/1/24)/BRIDGEPORT (POST 1/1/24)
  24. TRANSFERRED TO SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY
  25. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD
  26. RANSFERRED TO SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY
  27. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD
  28. OTICE Def Singewalds' Notice of Service of Discovery to Plaintiff
  29. RDER General Case Management Order RESULT: Order 7/23/2024 BY THE CLERK
  30. OTICE Notice of Discovery to Plaintiff
  31. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD Defendants Fraczeks Motion for Further Extension of Time to Plead
  32. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 From (Keenan Fraczek, Brennan Fraczek and Joanna Fraczek)
  33. OTION FOR DEFAULT -FAILURE TO APPEAR PB 17-20 Re: Raul Valle Sr RESULT: Order 9/4/2024 BY THE CLERK
  34. RDER RESULT: Order 9/4/2024 BY THE CLERK
  35. OTION FOR DEFAULT -FAILURE TO APPEAR PB 17-20 Re: Christopher Snyder RESULT: Withdrawn 8/27/2024 BY THE CLERK Last Updated: Result Information - 09/04/2024
  36. ECORD CORRECTION RESULT: Order 9/4/2024 BY THE CLERK Last Updated: Document Moved - 09/04/2024
  37. OTION TO CONSOLIDATE
  38. ITHDRAWAL OF MOTION Entry #119.00
  39. EQUEST TO REVISE
  40. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 From (William Singewald, Sheldon Singewald and Denise Marini-Singewald)
  41. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 Re: (Keenan Fraczek, Brennan Fraczek and Joanna Fraczek)
  42. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD As to the Defendants, the DaSilvas
  43. EQUEST FOR ADJUDICATION COMPLEX LITIGATION (JD-CL-77) By Defendants Singewald (on Teele)
  44. RDER Discovery due 2/4/25 RESULT: Order 10/10/2024 HON ROBIN WILSON
  45. NSWER TO COMPLAINT BY DEFENDANTS, DIMITRIOS ARFANIS AND IRENE MANALIS
  46. EQUEST TO REVISE
  47. RDER remote status conference 1/7/25 11:30 RESULT: Order 12/9/2024 HON ROBIN WILSON
  48. OTION FOR ORDER
  49. OTION FOR ORDER Defendants Fraczeks Motion for Order of Nonsuit Re: Interrogatories and Requests for Production
  50. OTICE Of Service of Discovery

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more