Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Southern Appellate Court

Court

Missouri Southern Appellate Court

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-05-02
Type Ap Worker's Compensation
Docket 44 entries

Docket Entries

  1. ppl for Tran SC Filed in SC SC101061
  2. otice-Filing App/Trans in SC Notice of Filing For Application for Transfer; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: RYAN EDWARD MURPHY On Behalf Of: MARK WALTON
  3. enied Now on this day, the court takes up and denies "APPELLANT'S APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI," filed April 3, 2025. Associated Entries: 04/03/2025 - Application for Transfer to SC +
  4. pplication for Transfer to SC Appellants Application for Transfer to The Supreme Court of Missouri; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: RYAN EDWARD MURPHY Associated Entries: 04/10/2025 - Denied +
  5. pinion- Affirmed Associated Entries: 03/20/2025 - Signed Majority Opinion +
  6. igned Majority Opinion Letter and Opinion emailed this date to Karla Hogg. Associated Entries: 03/20/2025 - Opinion- Affirmed
  7. ral Argument Heard
  8. ase Docketed Oral Argument scheduled for March 11, 2025, at 11:00 a.m., in Springfield, Missouri.
  9. ourt Order Issued The Court, on its own motion, hereby transfers this cause to the Court en banc. The case will be scheduled for oral argument on a future en banc docket unless the Court determines that oral argument would not be beneficial pursuant to Southern District Special Rule 1(e).
  10. orrespondence Received Correspondence to the Court; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: RYAN EDWARD MURPHY On Behalf Of: MARK WALTON
  11. tricken Case stricken from court's divisional docket set for January 14, 2025, per the court order issued today's date. Associated Entries: 12/04/2024 - Clerk Remark +
  12. ourt Order Issued The Court notes that it has received and reviewed Assistant Attorney General Robert Schaeffer's correspondence of January 6, 2025, regarding the Eastern District case of Patrick Ryan v. Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, ED112149. Having considered the matter, the Court hereby strikes this case from the Court's divisional docket set for January 14, 2025. The case will be rescheduled for oral argument on a future docket unless the Court determines that oral argument would not be beneficial pursuant to Southern District Special Rule 1(e).
  13. orrespondence Received Letter to the Court; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: ROBERT JOSEPH SCHAEFFER On Behalf Of: TREASURER OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI-CUSTODIAN 2ND INJURY FUND
  14. lerk Remark Oral Argument scheduled for January 14, 2025, at 11:00 a.m., in Springfield, Missouri. [CASE STRICKEN FROM DOCKET BY COURT ORDER ISSUED 01/13/2025.] Associated Entries: 01/13/2025 - Stricken +
  15. lerk Remark Case assigned to division comprising Judges Bates, Growcock, and Hamner.
  16. edacted Info Flng Sheet Filed CRIFS; Respondents Brief; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service in associated to Respondent filed on 09/13/2024. Filed By: ROBERT JOSEPH SCHAEFFER On Behalf Of: TREASURER OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI-CUSTODIAN 2ND INJURY FUND Associated Entries: 09/13/2024 - Respondent's Brief +
  17. espondent's Brief Redacted Respondents Brief; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: ROBERT JOSEPH SCHAEFFER On Behalf Of: TREASURER OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI-CUSTODIAN 2ND INJURY FUND Associated Entries: 09/13/2024 - Redacted Info Flng Sheet Filed +
  18. eq for Oral Argument Filed Request for Oral Argument; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: RYAN EDWARD MURPHY On Behalf Of: MARK WALTON
  19. ppellant's Brief Appellants Brief; Appendix to Appellants Brief; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: RYAN EDWARD MURPHY On Behalf Of: MARK WALTON
  20. ranted Until August 16, 2024 Associated Entries: 07/09/2024 - Mot Ext Time to File Brief +
  21. ot Ext Time to File Brief Appellants Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: RYAN EDWARD MURPHY On Behalf Of: MARK WALTON Associated Entries: 07/09/2024 - Granted Until +
  22. ote to Clerk eFiling Filed By: ROBERT JOSEPH SCHAEFFER
  23. ntry of Appearance Filed Entry of Appearance; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: ROBERT JOSEPH SCHAEFFER On Behalf Of: TREASURER OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI-CUSTODIAN 2ND INJURY FUND
  24. ecord on Appeal Complete
  25. ote to Clerk eFiling
  26. ranscript Filed TS Vol 24 of 29 pgs 3709-3898; TS Vol 25 of 29 pgs 3899-4054; TS Vol 26 of 29 pgs 4055-4244; TS Vol 27 of 29 pgs 4245-4434; TS Vol 28 of 29 pgs 4435-4620; TS Vol 29 of 29 pgs 4621-4689; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
  27. ote to Clerk eFiling
  28. ranscript Filed TS Vol 20 of 29 pgs 3020-3209; TS Vol 21 of 29 pgs 3210-3399; TS Vol 22 of 29 pgs 3400-3518; TS Vol 23 of 29 pgs 3519-3708; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
  29. ote to Clerk eFiling
  30. ranscript Filed TS Vol 17 of 29 pgs 2464-2633; TS Vol 18of 29 pgs 2634-2823; TS Vol 19 of 29 pgs 2824-3019; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
  31. ote to Clerk eFiling
  32. ranscript Filed TS Vol 14 of 29 pgs 1933-2122; TS Vol 15 of 29 pgs 2123-2309; TS Vol 16 of 29 pgs 2310-2463; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
  33. ote to Clerk eFiling
  34. ranscript Filed TS Vol 9 of 29 pgs 1028-1217; TS Vol 10 of 29 pgs 1218-1407; TS Vol 11 of 29 pgs 1408-1552; TS Vol 12 of 29 pgs 1553-1742; TS Vol 13 of 29 pgs 1743-1932; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
  35. ote to Clerk eFiling
  36. ranscript Filed TS Vol 5 of 29 pgs 268-457; TS Vol 6 of 29 pgs 458-647; TS Vol 7 of 29 pgs 648-837; TS Vol 8 of 29 pgs 838-1027; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
  37. ote to Clerk eFiling
  38. ranscript Filed TS Vol 1 of 29 pgs 1-164; TS Vol 2 of 29 pgs 165-181; TS Vol 3 of 29 pgs 182-211; TS Vol 4 of 29 pgs 212-267; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
  39. ote to Clerk eFiling
  40. egal File Filed ROA Pt 1 of 3 pgs 1-159; ROA Pt 2 of 3 pgs 160-221; ROA Pt 3 of 3 pgs 222-228; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
  41. cknowledgement Letter Sent
  42. ivision Assigned
  43. OA Filed in Appellate Court
  44. iling Fee Paid

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more