Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Middlesex County

Court

Middlesex County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-07-10
Type T 90 Torts All Other
Docket 70 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Anthony T Camarco
Defendant Carolyn D'onofrio|John D Watts|Removed

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. PPEARANCE Appearance
  4. PPEARANCE Appearance
  5. ETURN OF SERVICE
  6. ERTIFICATION OF SERVICE RESULT: Withdrawn 7/26/2024 BY THE PLAINTIFF
  7. EMORANDUM Addendum 1 - Exhibits in Support of Appeal RESULT: Withdrawn 7/26/2024 BY THE PLAINTIFF
  8. EMORANDUM Addendum 2 - Additional Exhibits in Support of appeal RESULT: Withdrawn 7/26/2024 BY THE PLAINTIFF
  9. ITHDRAWAL OF MOTION certificate of service 101.00
  10. ITHDRAWAL OF MOTION Memorandum 102.00
  11. ITHDRAWAL OF MOTION Memorandum 103.00
  12. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RESULT: Granted 8/19/2024 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  13. RDER RESULT: Granted 8/19/2024 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  14. EQUEST TO REVISE
  15. BJECTION TO MOTION Objection To Defendant Watts? Motion for Extension of Time
  16. BJECTION TO REQUEST Objection to Defendant Watts' REQUEST TO REVISE RESULT: Overruled 9/11/2024 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  17. RDER RESULT: Overruled 9/11/2024 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  18. OTION FOR DEFAULT -FAILURE TO APPEAR PB 17-20 MOTION FOR DEFAULT FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR - Carolyn D'Onofrio RESULT: Granted 9/4/2024 BY THE CLERK
  19. RDER RESULT: Granted 9/4/2024 BY THE CLERK
  20. OTION FOR DEFAULT-FAILURE TO PLEAD PLAINTIFF?S MOTION FOR DEFAULT FOR FAILURE TO PLEAD AGAINST DEFENDANT CAROLYN D?ONOFRIO RESULT: Denied 9/4/2024 BY THE CLERK
  21. RDER RESULT: Denied 9/4/2024 BY THE CLERK
  22. ERTIFICATION OF SERVICE Superior Court Order # 089998 (attached), dated September 4, 2024, GRANTING August 26, 2024, 111.00
  23. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) Case Flow Request With Attachments
  24. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116)
  25. MENDED COMPLAINT REVISED COMPLAINT per Order 418032
  26. EQUEST TO REVISE SECOND REQUEST TO REVISE AFTER COURT ORDER 110.10
  27. OTION FOR NONSUIT FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ORDER Order 110.10 dated 9/11/24 RESULT: Denied 10/15/2024 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  28. RDER RESULT: Denied 10/15/2024 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  29. BJECTION TO MOTION FOR NONSUIT MOTION IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT D?ONOFRIO?S MOTION FOR NON-SUIT
  30. BJECTION TO REQUEST TO REVISE Objection to Defendant Watts' 2nd REQUEST TO REVISE the Plaintiff?s Amended Complaint RESULT: Sustained 11/12/2024 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  31. RDER RESULT: Sustained 11/12/2024 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  32. EPLY Reply to Plaintiff October 23, 2024 Objection To Second Request To Revise
  33. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) RESULT: Denied 10/28/2024 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  34. RDER RESULT: Denied 10/28/2024 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  35. OTION FOR DEFAULT-FAILURE TO PLEAD MOTION FOR DEFAULT FOR FAILURE TO PLEAD RESULT: Denied 12/26/2024 BY THE CLERK
  36. RDER RESULT: Denied 12/26/2024 BY THE CLERK
  37. OTION TO DISMISS PB 10-30 Standing of the Plaintiff RESULT: Denied 5/14/2025 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  38. RDER RESULT: Denied 5/14/2025 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  39. EMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION Memorandum in Support of PB10-30 MTD
  40. OTION TO DISMISS PB 10-30 Motion to Dismiss with Memorandum of Law Attached RESULT: Granted 5/14/2025 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  41. RDER RESULT: Granted 5/14/2025 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  42. UDGMENT IN PART OF DISMISSAL CASE REMAINS PENDING
  43. BJECTION PLAINTIFF?S OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT CAROLYN D?ONOFRIO?S MOTION TO DISMISS (124.0, 125.0) RESULT: Off 1/21/2025 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  44. RDER RESULT: Off 1/21/2025 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  45. BJECTION OBJECTION TO JOHN D. WATTS? MOTION TO DISMISS (126.0) RESULT: Off 1/21/2025 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  46. RDER RESULT: Off 1/21/2025 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  47. EPLY
  48. EPLY PLAINTIFF?S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT WATTS? REPLY TO PLAINTIFF?S OBJECTION TO MOTION TO DISMISS (129.0)
  49. CHEDULING ORDER PLAINTIFF?S MOTION FOR SCHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Rejected 5/21/2025 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  50. RDER RESULT: Rejected 5/21/2025 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  51. RDER RESULT: Order 2/5/2025 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  52. EPLY REPLY TO CAMARCO OBJECTION TO MOTION TO DISMISS
  53. FFIDAVIT AFF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
  54. EPLY PLAINTIFF?S REPLY TO DEFENDANT?S RESPONSE TO OBJECTION TO MOTION TO DISMISS
  55. OTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF?S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT?S RESPONSE TO OBJECTION TO MOTION TO DISMISS
  56. FFIDAVIT PLAINTIFF?S AFFIDAVIT IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT?S AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
  57. EPLY Reply to Camarco Objection
  58. ISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURE MRPC 3.3(b)
  59. EPLY PLAINTIFF?S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT WATTS? ?DISCLOSURE?
  60. EMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION ORAL ARGUMENT ? PLAINTIFF?S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF STANDING
  61. EMORANDUM POST-HEARING CLARIFICATION MEMORANDUM 2 26 2025
  62. EMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STRIKE PB 10-40
  63. EPLY PLAINTIFF?S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT?S April 8, 2025, REPLY TO PLAINTIFF?S MOTION TO STRIKE
  64. RDER re: scheduling order RESULT: Order 5/21/2025 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  65. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE To File a JOINT scheduling order RESULT: Granted 6/10/2025 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  66. RDER RESULT: Granted 6/10/2025 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  67. BJECTION TO MOTION OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT?S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
  68. OTION TO REARGUE/RECONSIDER MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT?S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Granted 6/30/2025 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  69. RDER RESULT: Granted 6/17/2025 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  70. RDER RESULT: Granted 6/30/2025 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more