Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-11-03
Type Cc Other Extraordinary Remedy
Docket 31 entries
Disposition Consent Judgment

Parties

Plaintiff S&w Foreclosure Corporation|Tarpley, Linda S
Defendant Jenkerson, Wendy
Photo of Hon. Sechrest Brice R

Judge

Hon. Sechrest Brice R

Jefferson County (MO)

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  2. Notice of Court Hearing Sent
  3. Consent Judgment
  4. Judgment Entered Judgment for the Defendant in the amount of $13,187.32
  5. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  6. Hearing Held Cause called, Plaintiff nor counsel appear. Defendant appears in person pro se. Interpleader Judgment is entered. Associated Entries: 03/14/2024 - Hearing Scheduled Scheduled For: 04/10/2024; 1:30 PM; BRICE R SECHREST; St. Francois
  7. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  8. Hearing Scheduled Associated Entries: 04/10/2024 - Hearing Held + Scheduled For: 04/10/2024; 1:30 PM; BRICE R SECHREST; St. Francois
  9. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  10. Amended Notice of Hrng Filed Amended Notice of Hearing. Filed By: LINDA S TARPLEY On Behalf Of: S&W FORECLOSURE CORPORATION
  11. Proposed Order Filed Proposed Interlocutory Order of Interpleader. Filed By: LINDA S TARPLEY
  12. Notice of Hearing Filed This is not a hearing docket. Filed By: LINDA S TARPLEY
  13. Motion Filed Motion for Interlocutory Order. Filed By: LINDA S TARPLEY
  14. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  15. Proposed Order Filed Proposed Court Order for Claim for Release of Surplus Funds Filed By: WENDY JENKERSON
  16. Answer Filed Answer of Defendant Wendy to Complaint for Interpleader; Claim for Release of Surplus Funds Filed By: WENDY JENKERSON
  17. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  18. Affidavit of Publication Publication Affidavit. Filed By: LINDA S TARPLEY On Behalf Of: S&W FORECLOSURE CORPORATION
  19. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  20. Notice of Order of Publication
  21. Order of Publication
  22. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  23. Proposed Order Filed Proposed Order Upon Application for Service by Publication. Filed By: LINDA S TARPLEY On Behalf Of: S&W FORECLOSURE CORPORATION
  24. Other Proposed Document Filed Proposed Notice Upon Order for Service by Publication. Filed By: LINDA S TARPLEY On Behalf Of: S&W FORECLOSURE CORPORATION
  25. Affd for Serv by Publication Affidavit for Order of Publication of Notice. Filed By: LINDA S TARPLEY On Behalf Of: S&W FORECLOSURE CORPORATION
  26. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  27. Judge Assigned
  28. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  29. Filing Info Sheet eFiling Filed By: LINDA S TARPLEY
  30. Certification Filed Redaction Certification. Filed By: LINDA S TARPLEY On Behalf Of: S&W FORECLOSURE CORPORATION
  31. Memorandum Filed Memorandum Regarding Service. Filed By: LINDA S TARPLEY On Behalf Of: S&W FORECLOSURE CORPORATION

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more