Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-03-21
Status Judgment
Type 06 Unlimited Breach Of Contract/warranty
Docket 53 entries
Disposition judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Hernandez, Ana Laura|Enriquez, Jesus Ulises
Defendant General Motors Llc|View Document 10/06/2025 Judgment Granting General Motors Llc's Motion For Summary Judgment|View Document 4.15.25 Ex Parte Application To Cont Trial; Declaration Of Cameron Major|View Document 4.15.25 [proposed] Order Ex Parte Application To Continue Trial And All Related Dates
Photo of Hon. Skiles Jon M

Judge

Hon. Skiles Jon M

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Order Denied View Document Proposed Judgment Re: memorandum of costs Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M Comment Proposed Judgment Granting Defendant General Motors LLC's Memorandum of Costs
  2. Civil case cover sheet View Document - Civil Case Cover Sheet
  3. Summons issued and filed View Document - Summons
  4. Notice of Hearing View Document - Notice of Case Management Conference and Assignment of Judge for All Purposes Comment Notice of Case Management Conference and Assignment of Judge for All Purposes (Emailed)
  5. Proof of Service View Document - Proof of Service of Summons
  6. Summons and Complaint Served
  7. Answer Filed View Document Answer
  8. Notice Filed View Document Notice Filed Comment Notice of Department Change from 402 to 97E
  9. Case Management Statement Filed Comment
  10. Case Management Statement Filed View Document Case Management Statement
  11. Notice Filed View Document Notice of Posting Jury Fees Comment Notice of Posting Advance Jury Fees
  12. ADR Stipulation Mediation filed View Document Stipulation Filed Comment Parties to engage in mediation. Mediator: Grant C Woodruff
  13. Case Management Conference Original Type Case Management Conference Judicial Officer Diaz, Maria G Hearing Time 3:00 PM Result Heard
  14. Minute Order Attachment View Document Minute Order Attachment Comment With clerk's certificate of mailing
  15. Remote Appearance Via Courtcall Comment Special appearance by Mary L. Arens McBride for J. Hampton
  16. Appeared in Person Comment Special appearance by M. Johnson for plaintiff
  17. Jury Trial Requested by Both Parties Comment Estimated time for trial is 7 days
  18. Referral to ADR
  19. Notice of Motion View Document 4.7.25 Notice of Motion for Summary Judgment; Memorandum of Points and Authorities Comment General Motors LLC's Notice of Motion for Summary Judgment; Memorandum of Points and Authorities
  20. Declaration Filed View Document 4.7.25 Declaration of Cameron Major Supporting General Motors LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment Comment Declaration of Cameron Major Supporting General Motors LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment
  21. Declaration Filed View Document 4.7.25 Declaration of Bryan Jensen supporting General Motors LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment Comment Declaration of Bryan Jensen supporting General Motors LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment
  22. Statement filed View Document 4.7.25 Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts Supporting GM's Motion for Summary Judgment Comment Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts Supporting General Motors LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment
  23. Trial brief filed View Document 4.7.25 Documentary Evidence in support of Motion of General Motors LLC for Summary Judgment Comment Documentary Evidence in support of Motion of General Motors LLC for Summary Judgment
  24. Order Received for Signature View Document 4.7.25 (Proposed) Order Re: General Motors LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment Comment Pending Hearing (Proposed) Order Re: General Motors LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment
  25. Ex parte Filed View Document 4.15.25 Defendant Ex Parte Application To Cont Trial; Declaration Of Cameron Major Comment Defendant General Motors LLCs Ex Parte Application To Continue Trial And All Related Dates; Declaration Of Cameron Major
  26. Order Received for Signature View Document 4.15.25 [Proposed] Order Defendant Ex Parte Application To Continue Trial And All Related Dates Comment Pending Hearing [Proposed] Order Defendant General Motors LLC's Ex Parte Application To Continue Trial And All Related Dates
  27. Chambers Work- Pre Original Type Chambers Work- Pre Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M Hearing Time 6:00 AM Result Heard
  28. Ex Parte Hearing Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M Hearing Time 3:29 PM Cancel Reason Court Order Comment to Cont Trial - Cameron Major ~ Filed
  29. Minute Order Attachment View Document 4.24.25 Minute Order Attachment from Chamber & CM Comment from Chamber and CM
  30. Order Denied View Document 4.24.25 OD on Ex Parte Application Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M Comment on Ex Parte Application
  31. ADR Report filed. View Document Notice Filed re: ADR Status Report
  32. Opposition filed View Document PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT -HRG 07/16/25 Comment PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO C.C.P. 437c(h) (Oppositions)
  33. Declaration Filed View Document DECLARATION OF LONG CAO IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO MTN SJ - HRG 07/16/25 Comment DECLARATION OF LONG CAO IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO C.C.P. 437c(h) (Declarations)
  34. Request Filed View Document REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF -HRG 07/16/25 Comment REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO C.C.P. 437c(h) (Requests)
  35. Statement filed View Document PLAINTIFFS SEPARATE STATEMENT OF FACTS AND SUPPORTING EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF -HRG 07/16/25 Comment PLAINTIFFS SEPARATE STATEMENT OF FACTS AND SUPPORTING EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO C.C.P. 437c(h) (Statements)
  36. Reply filed Comment GENERAL MOTORS LLCS REPLY BRIEF SUPPORTING ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION (Comment)
  37. Mandatory Settlement Conference Hearing Time 1:30 PM Cancel Reason Off Calendar
  38. Chambers Work - Notice of Remote Appearance Original Type Chambers Work - Notice of Remote Appearance Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M Hearing Time 5:32 PM Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  39. Notice of Remote Appearance. View Document Notice of Remote Appearance - Hrg 7/16/25 Comment Party: Defendant Type of Appearance Requested: Zoom
  40. Notice of Order on Remote Appearance Comment Mailed/Emailed to: [email protected]
  41. Order Regarding Remote Appearance Granted View Document Order Re: Remote Appearance Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M Comment Party: Arens McBride, Mary L. Type of Appearance Requested: Zoom
  42. Summary Judgment Original Type Summary Judgment Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M Hearing Time 3:27 PM Result Uncontested Comment Cameron Major ~ Filed
  43. Appeared in Person
  44. Remote Appearance Via Zoom
  45. Minute Order Attachment (Tentative Rulings Only) View Document 7.16.25 - Minute Order, Tentative Ruling, & CM Comment and CM
  46. Trial Readiness Hearing Time 9:30 AM Cancel Reason Court Order
  47. Jury Trial Judicial Officer Culver Kapetan, Kristi Hearing Time 9:00 AM Cancel Reason Court Order
  48. Summary Judgment Original Type Summary Judgment Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M Hearing Time 3:27 PM Result Uncontested
  49. Minute Order Attachment (Tentative Rulings Only) View Document 9.17.25 Minute Order, Tentative Ruling, and CM Comment and CM
  50. Memorandum of Costs filed View Document Memorandum of Costs Comment Total Costs: $1,083.67
  51. Order Received for Signature View Document Judgment Granting Defendant General Motors LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment Comment (Proposed) Judgment Granting Defendant General Motors LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment
  52. Chamber Work - CG Orders - PRE Original Type Chamber Work - CG Orders - PRE Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M Hearing Time 5:30 PM Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration Comment (Proposed) Judgment on Motion for Summary Judgment
  53. Chamber Work - CL Orders - POST Original Type Chamber Work - CL Orders - POST Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M Hearing Time 5:30 PM Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more