Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- E-File complaint filed.
- Statement of damages filed by Plaintiff alleging contract action for damages of $25000. or less(Dist./Mun.Cts.Supp.R.Civ.P. 102A)
- Verification of Defendant's address filed (Standing Order 2-15)
- Form generated: A Notce to the Parties was generated and sent to: Plaintiff, Attorney: Daniel J Veerman, Esq. Cohn and Dussi, LLC 68 Harrison Ave Suite 502, Boston, MA 02111
- Return of service on complaint and summons to Kaileigh Mcneil: Officer service SERVED at last and usual abode (Mass.R.Civ.P. 4(f)).
- Application to clerk-magistrate to enter default against Kaileigh Mcneil filed by Carr Funeral Home (Mass.R.Civ.P. 55(a) & 77(b)).
- Default entered against Kaileigh Mcneil by clerk-magistrate (Mass.R.Civ.P. 55(a) & 77(b)). Judge: Carrigan, C-M Thomas C
- Appearance filed On this date Sahara June C Defensor, Esq. dismissed/withdrawn for Plaintiff Carr Funeral Home
- Application to clerk-magistrate for default judgment against Kaileigh Mcneil who has been defaulted for failure to appear filed by Carr Funeral Home (Mass.R.Civ.P.55(b)(1) & 77(b)).
- Misc Entry: REQUEST FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT ALLOWED
- Judgment Entered:: Judgment for the Plaintiff , after default Presiding: C-M Thomas C Carrigan Judgment For: Carr Funeral Home Judgment Against: Kaileigh Mcneil Terms of Judgment: Interest Begins: 12/02/2021 Jdgmnt Date: 03/07/2022 Interest Rate: .12 Daily Interest Rate: .000329 Damages: Damage Amt: 9120.00 Filing Fees: 195.00 Costs Pd to Court: 5.00 Other Costs: 24.88 Judgment Total: 9,629.93 Further Orders: EXECUTION TO ISSUE ON TEN DAYS
- Event Scheduled Event: Status Review (CV) Date: 03/22/2022 Time: 06:00 PM Result: Brought Forward
- Event Resulted: Status Review (CV) scheduled on: 03/22/2022 06:00 PM Has been: Brought Forward Hon. Richard A Eustis, Presiding
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In