Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-06-08
Type Negligence
Docket 70 entries
Disposition Judgment
Photo of Hon. PAYTON, JEFF

Judge

Hon. PAYTON, JEFF

Muskogee County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. PETITION FILED (CIVIL 10,001.00 OR MORE)
  2. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
  3. LENGHTY TRIAL FUND
  4. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  5. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  6. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  7. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  9. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  10. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  11. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  12. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  13. SUMMONS ISSUED BK TO ATTY
  14. DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME IN
  15. WHICH TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO
  16. PLAINTIFF'S PETITION
  17. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
  18. ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OTHERWASE RESPON
  19. RETURN OF SERVICE BY CERTIFIED MAIL
  20. NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL
  21. ORDER
  22. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS
  23. PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS
  24. DEFENDANT'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS
  25. AGREED ORDER FOR HEARING
  26. MOTION TO TEMPORARILY ASSOCIATE COUNSEL-EDWARD HAN
  27. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND FOR ENTRY OF SCHEDULING ORDER
  28. ORDER TEMPORARILY ADMITTING TO PRACTICE
  29. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS
  30. CHEROKEE NATION'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF A DISCOVERY MASTER
  31. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY CONFERENCE
  32. ORDER FOR HEARING
  33. NOTICE OF FILING
  34. MOTION TO STRIKE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR DISCOVERY CONFERENCE AND APPOINTMENT OF DISCOVERY MASTER
  35. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY DISTRICT COURT PROCEEDING AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT
  36. NOTICE OF ORIGINAL JURISDICTION SUPREME COURT PROCEEDING
  37. PLAINTIFF'S COMBINED RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE HEARING AND MOTION TO STAY AND PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  38. COURT MINUTE
  39. DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY CONFERENCE AND MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF DISCOVERY MASTER
  40. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  41. RESPONSE TO APPLICATION TO ASSUME ORIGINAL JURISDICTION AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION, MANDAMUS, OR OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF
  42. MOTION TO ASSOCIATE COUNSEL
  43. ORDER FOR HEARING
  44. MORRIS & DICKSON, LLC'S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
  45. ORDER ADMITTING TO PRACTICE
  46. SCHEDULING ORDER
  47. INITIAL DISCLOSURE OF PLAINTIFF THE CHEROKEE NATION
  48. JOINT MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING THE DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
  49. PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING THE DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
  50. SUBPOENA FOR PRODUCTION OF DESIGNATED DOCUMENTS AND ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION
  51. THE CHEROKEE NATION'S MOTION TO RE-URGE APPOINTMENT OF A DISCOVERY MASTER
  52. PLAINTIFF THE CHEROKEE NATION'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
  53. ORDER APPOINTING A DISCOVERY MASTER
  54. MOTION TO ASSOCIATE COUNSEL
  55. RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL
  56. PLANTIFF THE CGEROKEE NATION'S MTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS RELATING TO DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINSTRATIION PROCEEDINGS AGAINST DEFENDANT MORRIS & DICKSON CO., LLC
  57. ORDER OF SPECIAL DISCOVERY MASTER
  58. PLANTIFF THE CHEROKEE NATION'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS BASED ON THE DISCOVERY MASTER'S ORDER OF JULY 2, 2025
  59. PLANTIFF THE CHEROKEE NATION'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS RELATING TO PUNITIVE DAMAGES
  60. PLAINTIFF THE CHEROKEE NATION'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS RELATING TO DEFENDANT'S ANTI-DIVERSION EFFORTS
  61. NOTICE OF FILING
  62. RESPONSE OF DEFENDANT, MORRIS & DICKSON CO., LLC., TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS BASED ON THE DISCOVEDRY MASTER'S ORDER OF JULY 2, 2025 ("THIRD MOTION TO COMPEL")
  63. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING RESOLUTION OF FORTHCOMING MOTION FOR SUMAARY JUDGMENT AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT
  64. DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMANTS RELATING TO DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION PROCEEDINGS AGAINST DEFENDANT MORRIS & DICKSON CO., LLC
  65. MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCATION OF DOSUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF THE CHEROKEE NATION'S SECOND REQUEST
  66. MOTION TO MODIFY SPECIAL DISCOVERY MASTER'S ORDER OF JULY 2, 2025
  67. PLAINTIFF THE CHEROKEE NATION'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY
  68. DEFENDANTS RESPONSE AND OBJECTION TO PLANTIFF'S (FOURTH) MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS RELATING TO PUNITIVE DAMAGES
  69. DEFENDANTS RESPONSE AND OBJECTION TO PLANTIFF'S (FIFTH) MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS RELATING TO PUNITIVE DAMAGES

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more