Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Danbury County

Court

Danbury County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-06-28
Type C 90 Contracts All Other
Docket 21 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Christine Kettner
Defendant Bartro, Perian A/k/a Bartro, Peri

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. PPEARANCE Appearance
  4. PPEARANCE Appearance
  5. ETURN OF SERVICE
  6. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD
  7. RDER RESULT: Order 7/29/2024 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  8. OTION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE PB 2-16 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice with Attorney McMahon Affidavit RESULT: Order 8/6/2024 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  9. RDER RESULT: Order 8/6/2024 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  10. EQUEST TO REVISE
  11. BJECTION TO REQUEST TO REVISE Plaintiff's Objection to Defendant's Request to Revise RESULT: Order 11/18/2024 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  12. RDER RESULT: Order 11/18/2024 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  13. MENDED COMPLAINT
  14. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 1/6/2025 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  15. RDER RESULT: Granted 1/6/2025 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  16. OTION TO STRIKE Motion to Strike Amended Complaint RESULT: Off 3/12/2025 BY THE COURT
  17. RDER remote hearing to be scheduled RESULT: Off 3/12/2025 BY THE COURT
  18. EMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Strike
  19. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF Motion for Extension of Time nunc pro tunc to file brief in opposition to motion to strike RESULT: Granted 3/24/2025 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  20. RDER RESULT: Granted 3/24/2025 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  21. EMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STRIKE PB 10-40

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more