Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- Proposed Order Proposed Agreed Judgment (filed as secure document) (stw 10/10/2025 ans)
- Original Petition Plaintiff's Original Petition
- Citation
- Citation Ammar, Syed Unserved
- Motion on Rule 106 Plaintiff's Motion for Substitute Service
- Request Request for Alternative Service *SEE NOTES TAB*
- Order on Substitution Signed 11/26/2024
- Motion on Substitution Plaintiff's Motion for Substitute Service
- Proposed Order Proposed Order on Plaintiff's Motion for Substitute Service (stw 04/07/2025 bn)
- DWOP Notice Sent qc/cc/AA
- Motion to Retain Plaintiff's Verified Motion to Retain Case on Docket
- DWOP Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Hrbacek, Dean)
- Order to Retain Order to Retain Case on Docket Signed 06/06/2025
- Order Order Setting Bench Trial
- Notice of Hearing Notice of Trial
- Bench Trial (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Hrbacek, Dean) 09/17/2025 Reset by Court to 09/18/2025
- Judge Docket Entry Case called at 9:00 AM; Proper notice has been sent to all parties by the Court on July 1, 2025; Bailiff Nipps called the case 3 times at 9:15 AM at the courtroom door and no one responded; P and D failed to appear; Bailiff Nipps called the case 3 times again at 10:00 AM at the courtroom door and no one responded; Case to be dismissed for want of prosecution. DAH
- Proposed Order DWOP order qc/tr/mla (stw 09/18/2025 tr)
- Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Signed 09/19/2025 qc/tr/AA
- Rule 11 Agreement Rule 11 Settlement Agreement (filed as secure document)
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In