Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of New Haven County

Court

New Haven County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-06-17
Type T 40 Torts Assault And Battery
Docket 22 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Meaghan Cunningham
Defendant Samuel Foley

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. PPEARANCE
  4. ETURN OF SERVICE
  5. OTION FOR DEFAULT -FAILURE TO APPEAR PB 17-20 RESULT: Order 10/8/2024 BY THE CLERK
  6. RDER RESULT: Denied 9/30/2024 BY THE CLERK Watermark
  7. RDER RESULT: Order 10/8/2024 BY THE CLERK
  8. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RESULT: Granted 1/3/2025 HON CESAR NOBLE
  9. RDER RESULT: Granted 1/3/2025 HON CESAR NOBLE
  10. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE Last Updated: Legend Code - 01/03/2025
  11. RDER RESULT: Granted 1/3/2025 HON CESAR NOBLE
  12. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Off 3/10/2025 HON ANGELICA PAPASTAVROS
  13. RDER RESULT: Off 3/10/2025 HON ANGELICA PAPASTAVROS
  14. CHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Denied 3/10/2025 HON ANGELICA PAPASTAVROS
  15. RDER RESULT: Denied 3/10/2025 HON ANGELICA PAPASTAVROS
  16. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE
  17. RDER RESULT: Order 3/25/2025 HON ANGELICA PAPASTAVROS
  18. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Denied 4/14/2025 HON ANGELICA PAPASTAVROS
  19. RDER RESULT: Denied 4/14/2025 HON ANGELICA PAPASTAVROS
  20. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Denied 4/14/2025 HON ANGELICA PAPASTAVROS
  21. RDER RESULT: Denied 4/14/2025 HON ANGELICA PAPASTAVROS
  22. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more