Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Docket Entries
- FILE & ENTER PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
- OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
- OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
- 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
- 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
- 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- STATE JUDICIAL INTERPRETER TRANSLATOR
- 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
- COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
- ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER.
- EMERGENCY EX PARTE ORDER OF PROTECTION. TWO CERT COPIES FOR PETITONER AND COPY FAXED TO TULSA COUNTY FOR SERVICE.
- COURT REPORTER FEE
- AJE: COST DUE TO CARD ALLOCATION FEE
- AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
- CONTINUED EMERGENCY ORDER OF PROTECTION TO 6/4/24 @11:00A.M.
- CM:LF:5/21/24: EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ORDER CONTINED BY AGREEMENT TO 6/4/24 @11:00A.M. DEFENDANT NOT SERVED.
- CM:LF:NO CSR 6/4/24 MOTION TO VACATE AND PROTECTIVE ORDER- AARON BUNDY PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF-BRIAN BEEN PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT- PO 2024-160 IS CONTINUED FOR ONE YEAR-IF THERE ARE NO REPORTED CHARGED VIOLATIONS IN THAT YEAR, IT WILL BE DISMISSED AND HE MAY BE ELIGIBLE FOR EXPUNGEMENT PER STATUTE-PARAGRAPH 15 OF THE DIVORCE DECREE IS NOT SELF EXECUTING-A REVIEW IS SET AUGUST 6, 2024 AT 9:30AM IN FD-23-163 TO DETERMINE HIS COMPLIANCE WITH THE DECREE AND THE CHILD'S BEST INTERESTS FOR ADVANCING THE RESPONDENT'S PARENTING TIME-EITHER PARTY MAY APPLY FOR AN EARLIER REVIEW-THIS RESOLVES THE PETITIONER'S MOTION TO VACATE THE DECREE-EACH PARTY SHALL PAY HIS AND HER OWN ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS-THE PARTIES ARE TO WORK THROUGH COUNSEL TO FACILITATE REMAINING PROPERTY EXCHANGES, INCLUDING LAW ENFORCEMENT STANDBY IF POSSIBLE.
- EPO CONTINUED FOR ONE YEAR, 6/4/2025 @11:00A.M. BEFORE JUDGE FARRIS COURTROOM 2. FOUR COPIES GIVEN.
- CM:LF:6/4/24: BOTH PARTIES PRESENT. ATTORNEY'S AARON BUNDY AND BRIAN BEEN PRESENT. EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ORDER CONTINUED FOR ONE YEAR. EXPIRES 6/4/2025
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In