Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Lorain Co

Court

Lorain Co

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-04-10
Type Divorce / Parentage
Docket 17 entries
Disposition transfer

Parties

Plaintiff Pena, Jeremy|P|D
Defendant P|Hungerford, Katelynn R|N/a|D
Photo of Hon. Janik, Judge Frank

Judge

Hon. Janik, Judge Frank

Lorain County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Filing fee of $380.00, paid by: RILEY RESAR & ASSOCIATES PLL
  2. COMPLAINT/ CMC NOTICE/ MOTION FOR MUTUAL RESTRAINING ORDER/ UCCJEA AFFIDAVIT/ MOTION FOR TEMPORARY ORDERS FILED BY ATTY PATRICK RILEY
  3. INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK FOR SERVICE FILED.
  4. CONTACT INFORMATION FORM FILED BY ATTY PATRICK RILEY
  5. **IV-D APPLICATION NOT SUBMITTED** **SEMINAR FOR SEPARATING PARENTS NOTICE PROVIDED TO ATTY PATRICK**
  6. MUTUAL RESTRAINING ORDERS GRANTED. SEE JRNL. (LIS) CC: ATTY RILEY, DEFT (CERT MAIL- BETHESDA CIR)
  7. SUMMONS/ COMPLAINT/ CMC NOTICE/ MOTIONS/ UCCJEA AFFIDAVIT/ JE DTD 04-16-24 SENT CERTIFIED MAIL TO: KATELYNN R HUNGERFORD (BETHESDA) ARTICLE #9414726699042216401331
  8. CLERKS OFFICE CERTIFIES COPIES OF ABOVE ENTRY DATED 04/16/24 PLACED IN ATTY FOLDER OR SENT ORDINARY MAIL TO: ATTY RILEY, DEFT (CERT MAIL- BETHESDA CIR)
  9. CERTIFIED MAIL WAS RETURNED AND FILED: #9414726699042216401331 MAILED TO KATELYNN HUNGERFORD - UNCLAIMED, UNABLE TO FORWARD. ATTY RILEY NOTIFIED
  10. STATUS RESET TO 8/7/24 AT 9AM BY ZOOM TO ALLOW SERVICE TO BE PERFECTED. SEE JRNL. (MAG ORDER)(TRB) CC: ATTY RILEY, DEFT (BETHESDA CIRCLE-ORD MAIL)
  11. INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK FOR SERVICE FILED.
  12. CLERKS OFFICE CERTIFIES COPIES OF ABOVE ENTRY DATED 6/11/24 PLACED IN ATTY FOLDER OR SENT ORDINARY MAIL TO: ATTY RILEY, DEFT (BETHESDA CIRCLE-ORD MAIL)
  13. CLERK'S OFFICE CERTIFIES SUMMONS W/COPY OF COMPLAINT/JRNL ENTRY DTD 6/11/24, JE FOR RESTRAINING ORDER DTD 4/16/24, MOTIONS/UCCJEA AFFIDAVIT, PARENTING SEMINAR SENT ORDINARY MAIL TO: KATELYNN R. HUNGERFORD (BETHESDA CIRCLE)
  14. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE/REQUEST FOR IMMEDIATE RECUSAL/SERVICE FILED BY ATTY MICHAEL TONY
  15. PURSUANT TO THE JUDGMENT ENTRY AND DECISION ISSUED BY THE OHIO SUPREME COURT, THIS CASE IS HEREBY TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF JUDGE LISA SWENSKI TO ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE LISA SWENSKI FOR RE-ASSIGNMENT. SEE JOURNAL. (LIS) CC: ATTY RILEY, ATTY TONY, JUDGE SWENSKI
  16. THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED TO THE DOCKET OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE LISA SWENSKI FOR RE-ASSIGNMENT DUE TO CONFLICT OF INTEREST WITH JUDGE SWENSKI INVOLVING CASES WITH ATTY TONY. PER RANDOM RE-ASSIGNMENT, THIS MATTER HAS BEEN RE-ASSIGNED TO THE DOCKET OF JUDGE JANIK. SEE JOURNAL. (LIS) CC: ATTY RILEY, ATTY TONY, JUDGE SWENSKI, JUDGE JANIK, K. REISINGER
  17. CLERKS OFFICE CERTIFIES COPIES OF ABOVE ENTRIES DATED 06/18/24 PLACED IN ATTY FOLDER OR SENT ORDINARY MAIL TO: ATTY RILEY, ATTY TONY, JUDGE SWENSKI, JUDGE JANIK, K. REISINGER

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more