Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- COMPLAINT FILED - $6,744.02 PLUS 8% INTEREST PER ANNUM FROM JUDGEMENT DATE AND COSTS Receipt: 316610 Date: 04/01/2024
- Issue Date: 04/04/2024 Service: SUMMONS ISSUED Method: (B) CERTIFIED MAIL Cost Per: $ EDEN, NANETTE 405 ROCKDALE AVE APT 43 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 44512 Tracking No: 9414726699042225728481
- SUCCESSFUL SERVICE Method : (B) CERTIFIED MAIL Issued : 04/04/2024 Service : SUMMONS ISSUED Served : Return : 04/08/2024 On : EDEN, NANETTE Signed By : ILLEGIBLE Reason : (B) SUCCESSFUL Comment : Tracking # : 9414726699042225728481
- ANSWER FILED BY DEFENDANT
- HEARING SCHEDULED Event: CIVIL PRE TRIAL (B) Date: 08/05/2024 Time: 10:30 am Judge: DESANTO, DONALD Location: COUNTY COURT # 2
- $125.00
- HEARING SCHEDULED Event: CIVIL TRIAL (B) Date: 12/09/2024 Time: 10:00 am Judge: DESANTO, DONALD Location: COUNTY COURT # 2
- MAGISTRATES DECISION: CASE CALLED FOR TRIAL ON DECEMBER 9, 2024. DEFENDANT PRESENT AS A SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGATE. PLAINTIFF FAILS TO APPEAR. A PHONE CALL TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL'S OFFICE AT 10:30AM WAS NOT ANSWERED. CASE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AT PLAINTIFF'S COSTS./S/DJD
- THE ATTACHED DECISION WAS FILED BY THE MAGISTRATE OF THIS COURT ON DECEMBER 9, 2024 . THE COURT FINDS THAT NO WRITTEN OBJECTIONS HAVE BEEN TIMELY FILED. THE COURT HAS CONDUCTED AN INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF THE MAGISTRATE'S DECISION AND FINDS THAT SUCH DECISION IS WELL SUPPORTED AND THERE IS NO ERROR OR DEFECT ON THE FACE OF SUCH DECISION. ACCORDING, SUCH ATTACHED MAGISTRATE'S DECISION IS ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY, PURSUANT TO CIVIL RULE 53(D)(4), AS A PERMANENT ORDER OF THE COURT. /S/ JOSEPH M HOUSER/MKD
- $125.00
- $0.00
- $0.00
- $0.00
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In