Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2023-02-13
Status CASE CLOSED
Type Other Tort
Docket 9 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Childress, Michael
Defendant O'dell, Garrett
Photo of Hon. Wetzel Richard D

Judge

Hon. Wetzel Richard D

Knox County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CIVIL FILING FEES
  2. COMPLAINT FILED 02/13/2023 11:42 AM Attorney: STIFFLER, JEFFEREY R
  3. INSTRUCTIONS OR PRAECIPE FILED 02/13/2023 11:42 AM Attorney: STIFFLER, JEFFEREY R
  4. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CERTIFIED MAIL TO GARRETT ODELL
  5. ATTORNEY NOTIFIED/RETURN RECEIPT NO SERVICE ON GARRETT O DELL (02/16/23) UNABLE TO FORWARD
  6. COURT ORDER- THE COURT FINDS THAT THIS CASES WAS FILED ON FEBRUARY 13, 2023 AND THE DEFENDANT GARRETT O DELL HAS NOT BEEN SERVED WITH THE COMPLAINT AND FURTHER PROCEEDINGS TO OBTAIN SERVICE HAVE NOT BEEN TAKEN SINCE FEBRUARY 16, 2023. PLEASE INVESTIGATE THAT POSSIBILITIES OF UTILIZING ALTERNATIVE METHODS TO OBTAIN SERVICE WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM THE FILING OF THIS ORDER . FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL OF THIS CASE PURSUANT TO RULE 41 COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B).
  7. JUDGMENT ENTRY - ORDERED THAT THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE FILED ON FEBRUARY 12, 20023 IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO RULE 41 COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B).
  8. NOTICE OF JOURNAL ENTRY FILING TO ATTYS. IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 58(B), IT IS VERIFIED THAT COPIES HAVE BEEN SENT TO THE PARTIES AND/OR THEIR ATTORNEY OF RECORD IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIVIL RULE 5(B) ON THIS DAY.
  9. CASE FINISHED CASE FILED AWAY

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.