Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2024-05-13
Status Active
Type (43) Unlimited Other Petition (not Spec)
Docket 51 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Gongqingcheng Panhui Investment Management Partnership (limited Partnership)
Defendant Yihua Zhu|Yuechen Yang|Xyz Corp.|1 10
Photo of Hon. Fineman Nancy L

Judge

Hon. Fineman Nancy L

San Mateo County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ase Management Conference
  2. omplaint
  3. ummons Issued / Filed
  4. ivil Case Cover Sheet
  5. ause Of Action
  6. otice of Assignment for All Purposes
  7. emurrer to
  8. roposed Order Received
  9. equest for Judicial Notice
  10. eclaration in Support
  11. emorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition
  12. eclaration in Opposition
  13. emorandum of Points and Authorities in Reply
  14. rder
  15. ffidavit of Mailing
  16. earing on Demurrer
  17. earing on Demurrer
  18. arty appeared by audio and/or video
  19. entative ruling modified and becomes order:
  20. arty shall prepare formal order consistent w/order herein
  21. ase Management Statement
  22. oint Case Management Statement
  23. otice of Posting Jury Fees
  24. ROOF OF SERVICE BY OTHER MEANS
  25. ROOF OF SERVICE BY OTHER MEANS
  26. otice
  27. ROPOSED ORDER COVER SHEET
  28. rder
  29. ffidavit of Service
  30. Serve
  31. Serve
  32. nswer
  33. otice of Pendency of Action (Lis Pendens)
  34. otice of Pendency of Action (Lis Pendens)
  35. otice of Pendency of Action (Lis Pendens)
  36. otice of Pendency of Action (Lis Pendens)
  37. ase Management Conference
  38. otice of Case Management Conference
  39. Serve
  40. ase Management Statement
  41. otice of Case Management Conference
  42. Serve
  43. ase Management Conference
  44. otice of Case Management Conference
  45. otice
  46. Serve
  47. ase Management Statement
  48. oint Case Management Statement
  49. otice of Case Management Conference
  50. Serve
  51. ase Management Conference

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.