Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-06-14
Status INACTIVE
Type Foreclosure Marsh. Of Lien
Docket 79 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Jpmorgan Chase Bank, National Association
Defendant Terry Lynn Martin|Jane Doe, Name Unknown, The Unknown Spouse Of Terry Lynn Martin, Terry L. Martin (if Any)|State Of Ohio, Department Of Taxation
Photo of Hon. JOHN D SUTULA

Judge

Hon. JOHN D SUTULA

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT
  2. COURT COST ASSESSED JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION BILLED C/O ATTY BILL AMOUNT 360.26 PAID AMOUNT 275 AMOUNT DUE 85.26
  3. COURT COST ASSESSED JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION BILL AMOUNT 360.26 PAID AMOUNT 275 AMOUNT DUE 85.26
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(55760512) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: JANE DOE, NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF TERRY LYNN MARTIN, TERRY 879 WELLMON STREET BEDFORD, OH 44146
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(55760511) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: TERRY LYNN MARTIN 879 WELLMON STREET BEDFORD, OH 44146
  6. JUDGMENT ENTRY(55760510) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: CARLA M. ALLEN [email protected]
  7. JUDGMENT ENTRY(55760509) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RICHARD J. SYKORA [email protected]
  8. JUDGMENT ENTRY(55760508) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RICHARD J. SYKORA [email protected]
  9. JUDGMENT ENTRY(55760507) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUSTIN M. RITCH [email protected]
  10. JUDGMENT ENTRY(55760506) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUSTIN M. RITCH [email protected]
  11. JUDGMENT ENTRY(55760505) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MICHAEL E CARLETON [email protected]
  12. JUDGMENT ENTRY(55760504) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MICHAEL E CARLETON [email protected]
  13. JUDGMENT ENTRY(55760503) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANGELA D. KIRK [email protected]
  14. JUDGMENT ENTRY(55760502) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANGELA D. KIRK [email protected]
  15. JUDGMENT ENTRY(55760501) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KIMBERLY FULKERSON [email protected]
  16. JUDGMENT ENTRY(55760500) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANN M JOHNSON [email protected]
  17. JUDGMENT ENTRY(55760499) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANN M JOHNSON [email protected]
  18. JUDGMENT ENTRY(55760498) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KYLE E TIMKEN [email protected]
  19. JUDGMENT ENTRY(55760497) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KYLE E TIMKEN [email protected]
  20. JUDGMENT ENTRY(55760496) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ROBERT J BYRNE [email protected]
  21. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. THE CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AT PLAINTIFF'S COSTS. FINAL COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  22. MOTION TO DISMISS FILED MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS UNDER RULE 41(A)(2)
  23. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 AFFIDAVIT OF JUSTIN M. RITCH
  24. CMC HELD. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND TERRY MARTIN, PRO SE, APPEARED. DEFENDANT MARTIN IS MAKING EFFORTS TO RESOLVE THE OUTSTANDING DEBT. ACCORDINGLY, THE COURT SETS THE FOLLOWING CASE SCHEDULE: DISCOVERY CUTOFF: OCTOBER 31, 2024 DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS MAY NOT BE FILED UNTIL NOVEMBER 1, 2024, BUT MUST BE FILED BY DECEMBER 2, 2024. OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS BY RULE. NOTICE ISSUED
  25. ANSWER FILED BY D3 STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION ATTORNEY ROBERT J BYRNE 0040299 STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION
  26. GENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ATTORNEY KYLE E TIMKEN 0071381 CIVIL RULE 26(B)(3) INITIAL DISCLOSURES
  27. NOTICE FILED BY P1 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 NOTICE OF HEARING
  28. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 07/26/2024 AT 11:00 AM BY TELEPHONE. THE CASE IS SET FOR TELEPHONE CMC. ANY PARTY MAY APPEAR AT THE TELEPHONE CMC BY CALLING 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TIME OF THE CMC. PLAINTIFF MUST SEND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF THE CMC AT LEAST 14 DAYS PRIOR TO THE CMC. THIS NOTICE MUST PROVIDE THE CALL-IN INFORMATION ABOVE. NOTICE ISSUED
  29. ANSWER OF TERRY LYNN MARTIN . PRO SE (9999999)
  30. USPS RECEIPT NO. 54098131 DELIVERED BY USPS 06/25/2024 STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION PROCESSED BY COC 07/03/2024.
  31. USPS RECEIPT NO. 54095418 DELIVERED BY USPS 06/25/2024 STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION PROCESSED BY COC 07/03/2024.
  32. SUGGESTION OF DEATH FILED BY P1 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 SUGGESTION OF DEATH
  33. USPS RECEIPT NO. 54098130 DELIVERED BY USPS 06/21/2024 JANE DOE, NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF TERRY LYNN MARTIN, TERRY PROCESSED BY COC 06/26/2024.
  34. USPS RECEIPT NO. 54098129 DELIVERED BY USPS 06/22/2024 MARTIN/TERRY/LYNN PROCESSED BY COC 06/26/2024.
  35. USPS RECEIPT NO. 54095417 DELIVERED BY USPS 06/21/2024 JANE DOE, NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF TERRY LYNN MARTIN, TERRY PROCESSED BY COC 06/26/2024.
  36. USPS RECEIPT NO. 54095416 DELIVERED BY USPS 06/21/2024 MARTIN/TERRY/LYNN PROCESSED BY COC 06/26/2024.
  37. 54095951 ON 06/21/2024 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED MARTIN/TERRY/LYNN BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  38. 54095952 ON 06/21/2024 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED JANE DOE, NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF TERRY LYNN MARTIN, TERRY BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  39. NOTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED TERRY SERVICE RETURN
  40. NOTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED UNKN TERRY SERVICE RETURN
  41. SUMS COMPLAINT(54098131) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION C/O OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL 150 EAST GAY STREET, 21ST FLOOR COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  42. SUMS COMPLAINT(54098130) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JANE DOE, NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF TERRY LYNN MARTIN, TERRY 879 WELLMON STREET BEDFORD, OH 44146
  43. SUMS COMPLAINT(54098129) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: TERRY LYNN MARTIN 879 WELLMON STREET BEDFORD, OH 44146
  44. SUMS COMPLAINT(54095418) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION C/O OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL 150 EAST GAY STREET, 21ST FLOOR COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  45. SUMS COMPLAINT(54095417) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JANE DOE, NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF TERRY LYNN MARTIN, TERRY 879 WELLMON STREET BEDFORD, OH 44146
  46. SUMS COMPLAINT(54095416) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: TERRY LYNN MARTIN 879 WELLMON STREET BEDFORD, OH 44146
  47. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  48. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  49. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  50. WRIT FEE
  51. WRIT FEE
  52. WRIT FEE
  53. SUMS COMPLAINT(54095952) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: JANE DOE, NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF TERRY LYNN MARTIN, TERRY 879 WELLMON STREET BEDFORD, OH 44146
  54. SUMS COMPLAINT(54095951) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: TERRY LYNN MARTIN 879 WELLMON STREET BEDFORD, OH 44146
  55. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  56. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  57. WRIT FEE
  58. WRIT FEE
  59. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  60. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  61. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  62. WRIT FEE
  63. WRIT FEE
  64. WRIT FEE
  65. MAGISTRATE BRIAN S GOZELANCZYK ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  66. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE
  67. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE
  68. ALL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  69. IT IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  70. JUDGE TIMOTHY MCCORMICK ASSIGNED (RANDOM); RE-FILED CASE, REASSIGNED TO ORIGINAL JUDGE, JUDGE JOHN D SUTULA
  71. JUDGE TIMOTHY MCCORMICK ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  72. SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  73. LEGAL RESEARCH
  74. LEGAL NEWS
  75. LEGAL AID
  76. COMPUTER FEE
  77. CLERK'S FEE
  78. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JUSTIN M. RITCH
  79. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JUSTIN M. RITCH

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more