Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2024-06-12
Type A 90 Appeals All Other
Docket 41 entries
Disposition judgment after completed trial to the court for the defendant(s)

Parties

Plaintiff Waterbury Board Of Education|New Haven Board Of Education
Defendant Connecticut State Board Of Education|Brass City Charter School, Inc.|Booker T. Washington Academy, Inc.

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. APPEARANCE Appearance
  2. SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT
  3. RETURN OF SERVICE
  4. UMMONS AND COMPLAINT
  5. ETURN OF SERVICE
  6. UPPLEMENTAL RETURN
  7. OTION FOR STAY RESULT: Denied 9/25/2024 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  8. RDER RESULT: Denied 9/25/2024 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  9. NSWER
  10. BJECTION Objection to 102.00 Motion for Stay
  11. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD
  12. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE Remote Status Conference (8/14/2024) RESULT: Granted 8/13/2024 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  13. RDER RESULT: Granted 8/13/2024 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  14. RDER RESULT: Order 8/30/2024 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  15. EMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Stay
  16. ERTIFIED LIST OF PAPERS IN THE RECORD PB 14-7A(b)/14-7B(b) Defendant's Submission of Certified List of Papers in the Administrative Record
  17. ERTIFIED LIST OF PAPERS IN THE RECORD PB 14-7A(b)/14-7B(b) Defendant's Submission of Administrative Record
  18. ITHDRAWAL Def?s Submission of Admin. Record withdrawn due to filing under incorrect category on 9-30-24
  19. ECORD IN ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS Defendant's Submission of Administrative Record
  20. RIEF Brief in Support of Petition for Administrative Appeal
  21. OTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Granted 12/5/2024 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  22. RDER RESULT: Granted 12/5/2024 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  23. OTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Granted 12/19/2024 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  24. RDER RESULT: Granted 12/19/2024 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  25. OTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Granted 1/13/2025 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  26. RDER RESULT: Granted 1/13/2025 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  27. RIEF Brief in Opposition to Petition for Administrative Appeal
  28. OTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Granted 1/31/2025 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  29. RDER RESULT: Granted 1/31/2025 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  30. RIEF in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Petition for Administrative Appeal
  31. OTION FOR PERMISSION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD IN ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL Motion for Judicial Notice and/or to Supplement the Administrative Record and Exhibit A and B RESULT: Denied 3/10/2025 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  32. RDER RESULT: Denied 3/10/2025 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  33. EPLY Plaintiffs' Reply to Defendants' Opposition
  34. BJECTION Objection to Plaintiffs' Motion for Judicial Notice and/or to Supplement the Administrative Record
  35. BJECTION TO MOTION Objection to 120.00 Motion for Judicial Notice and/to Supplement the Administrative Record
  36. RIEF SUPPLEMENTAL
  37. OTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER
  38. OTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER Response to Doc.124.00
  39. EMORANDUM OF DECISION
  40. UDGMENT AFTER COMPLETED TRIAL TO THE COURT FOR THE DEFENDANT(S) RESULT: HON HENRY COHN
  41. PPEAL TO APPELLATE COURT

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.