Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oakland Co

Court

Oakland Co

Michigan

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-02-22
Type Pz
Docket 29 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Bolds Alea|Ragsdale Martin
Defendant None|Paycor Inc
Photo of Hon. DANIEL P. O'BRIEN

Judge

Hon. DANIEL P. O'BRIEN

Oakland County (MI)

Michigan

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. FINAL DISP-DISMISS
  2. STIP/ORD FILED DISMISS W/PREJ
  3. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  4. DATE SET FOR CASE EVAL ON 10132022 8:40 AM
  5. DATE SET FOR TRIAL ON 01032023 01 30 PM
  6. PROCEEDING TO BE HELD IN-PERSON
  7. SCHEDULING ORDER FILED
  8. 05/25/2022 SHOW CAUSE: FAILURE TO MAKE SERVICE OF PROCESS.
  9. SCHEDULING ORDER NOT PRODUCED
  10. 08/12/2022 EXPERT DATE.
  11. 10/13/2022 CASE EVALUATION DATE.
  12. 08/16/2022 WITNESS DATE.
  13. 10/14/2022 MOTION DATE.
  14. 09/15/2022 DISCOVERY DATE.
  15. ORDER FILED RE PLF MTN CMPL NON PRTY W/SUBPOENA
  16. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  17. HEARD ON RECORD
  18. ORDER FILED RE PLF MTN TO COMPEL
  19. HEARD ON RECORD
  20. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  21. MOTION PRAECIPE FILED FOR 03232022 JUDGE 08
  22. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  23. RESPONSE FILED OPPOSE MTN COMPEL SUBPOENA/POS/NONPTY
  24. APPEARANCE FILED NONPARTY/POS
  25. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  26. MOTION PRAECIPE FILED FOR 03092022 JUDGE 08
  27. APPEARANCE FILED /POS/NONPARTY
  28. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  29. MOTION FILED COMPEL NON PRTY ATTEND CMPLY W/SUBPOENA

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more