Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Napa County Superior

Court

Napa County Superior

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-05-13
Status Consolidated
Type Other Probate With At Least One Hearing
Docket 44 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Kirkpatrick, Keith
Defendant Respondent varner, Jean M
Photo of Hon. Young, Scott R.l.

Judge

Hon. Young, Scott R.l.

Napa County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Consolidated Non-Lead
  2. Notice of Hearing
  3. Declaration Comment MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF PETITION TO DETERMINE VALIDITY OF DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY AND ADVANCE HEALTH CARE DIRECTIVE
  4. Declaration Comment DECLARATION OF KEITH KIRKPATRICK IN SUPPORT OF PETITION
  5. Declaration Comment DECLARATION OF MICHAEL MANFRED IN RE TESTATEMNTARY CAPACITY OF BRADLEY KIRKPATRICK
  6. Declaration Comment DECLARATION OF GLENN A. HAMMEL, Ph.D. RE: CAPACITY OF BRADLEY KIRKPATRICK
  7. Proof of Service Comment Proof of Service of Notice of Hearing
  8. Proof of Service Comment Proof of Service
  9. Notice Comment Notice of Related Case
  10. Declaration Comment Declaration of David G. Knitter in support of Petition
  11. Proof of Service Comment Proof of Service
  12. Petition Hearing Original Type Petition Hearing Judicial Officer Young, Scott R.L. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Heard Comment To Determine Validity of Durable Power of Attorney. To Compel Third Person to Honor the Authority of an Attorney-In-Fact. To Appoint Interim Attorney-in-Fact. Alternatively, for Preliminary. Injunction Freezing Financial Assets. To Determine Validity of Advance Health Care Directive. To Compel Third Person to Honor Individual Health Care Instructions or the Authority of an Agent or Surrogate.
  13. Minute Order
  14. Declaration Comment Declaration of Dan Cunningham
  15. Proof of Service
  16. Declaration Comment Declaration of David G. Knitter Regarding Meet and Confer Attempts
  17. Proof of Service
  18. Memorandum Comment Supplemental Memorandum of Points and Authorities
  19. Declaration Comment Declaration of Sarah Kirkpatrick Concerning Bradley Kirkpatrick's Care
  20. Declaration Comment Supplemental Declaration of Keith Kirkpatrick in Support of Petition
  21. Proof of Service
  22. Opposition or Objections Comment JEAN VARNER'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSE TO KEITH KIRKPATRICK'S PETITION: (1) TO DETERMINE VALIDITY OF DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY; (2) TO COMPEL THIRD PERSON TO HONOR THE AUTHORITY OF AN ATTORNEY-IN- FACT; (3) TO APPOINT INTERIM ATTORNEY-IN-FACT; (4) ALTERNATIVELY, FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION FREEZING FINANCIAL ASSETS; (5) TO DETERMINE VALIDITY OF ADVANCE HEALTH CARE DIRECTIVE; (6) TO COMPEL THIRD PERSON TO HONOR INDIVIDUAL HEALTH CARE INSTRUCTIONS OR THE AUTHORITY OF AN AGENT OR SURROGATE (PROBATE CODE 4454, 4679 AND 1043)
  23. Declaration Comment DECLARATION OF JEAN VARNER
  24. Declaration Comment Declaration of Louis Pacella, ESQ.
  25. Petition Hearing Judicial Officer Smith, Cynthia P Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Heard Comment to Determine Validity of Durable Power of Attorney, to Compel Third Person to Honor the Authority of an Attorney-in-Fact, to Appoint Interim Attorney-in-Fact. Alternatively, the Preliminary Injunction Freezing Financial Assets, to Determine Validity of Advance Health Care Directive, To Compel Third Person to Honor Individual Health Care Instructions or the Authority of an Agent or Surrogate. (TO SET).
  26. Minute Order
  27. Opposition or Objections Comment AMENDED OBJECTIONS
  28. Brief Comment Attorney in Fact/Health Care Agent Keith Kirpatrick's Trial Brief
  29. Opposition or Objections Comment PETITIONER KEITH KIRKPATRICK S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATIONS FILED IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENT S OBJECTION TO PETITION
  30. Proof of Service Comment Proof of Service
  31. Memorandum: Points and Authorities Comment MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF JEAN VARNER S AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSE TO KEITH KIRPATRICKS PETITION: (1) TO DETERMINE VALIDITY OF DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY; (2) TO COMPEL THIRD
  32. Proof of Service
  33. Notice Comment Notice of Remote Appearance (Louis Pacella, Esq.)
  34. Notice Comment Notice of remote appearance (Ray Linker)
  35. Order Comment Order on Notice of Remote Appearance (Louis Pacella, Esq.)
  36. Order Comment Order on Notice of Remote Appearance (Ray Linker)
  37. Exhibit List (Party) Comment Petitioner Keith Kirkpatrick's Exhibit List for Evidentiary Hearing
  38. Witness List Comment Petitioner Keith Kirkpatrick's Witness List for Evidentiary Hearing
  39. Proof of Service Comment Proof of Service
  40. Exhibit List (Party)
  41. Witness List
  42. Proof of Service
  43. Other Hearing Original Type Other Hearing Judicial Officer Smith, Cynthia P Hearing Time 10:30 AM Result Heard Comment TE: 1 day, Evidentiary hearing
  44. Stat Closure: PR or MH Consolidated

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more