Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-06-06
Status INACTIVE
Type Consumer Debt
Docket 36 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Capital One Successor Of Discover Bank
Defendant Keivon Gunn
Photo of Hon. DANIEL GAUL

Judge

Hon. DANIEL GAUL

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  2. WRIT FEE
  3. JUDGE DANIEL GAUL ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  4. LEGAL RESEARCH
  5. LEGAL NEWS
  6. LEGAL AID
  7. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  8. COMPUTER FEE
  9. CLERK'S FEE
  10. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DAVID MULLEN
  11. UDGMENT ENTRY(54849384) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: SEAN M. WINTERS [email protected]
  12. UDGMENT ENTRY(54849383) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: SEAN M. WINTERS [email protected]
  13. UDGMENT ENTRY(54849382) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KRIS K VELAYUDHAN [email protected]
  14. UDGMENT ENTRY(54849381) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KRIS K VELAYUDHAN [email protected]
  15. PON THE COMPLAINT AND SUBSEQUENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT FILED BY PLAINTIFF, DEFENDANT, KEIVON GUNN, HAS FAILED TO ENTER AN APPEARANCE, FILE AN ANSWER, OR OTHERWISE DEFEND THIS MATTER DESPITE BEING DULY SERVED WITH PROCESS ACCORDING TO LAW. THE COURT HEREBY RENDERS JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT IN THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $2,656.31 TOGETHER WITH INTEREST FROM THE DATE OF JUDGMENT AT THE STATUTORY RATE OF 8.00% PER ANNUM AND COSTS OF $258.95. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE TIMOTHY J MCGINTY. NOTICE ISSUED
  16. OTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, FILED 08/06/2024, IS GRANTED. THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE TIMOTHY J MCGINTY. NOTICE ISSUED
  17. OTICE FILED BY P1 DISCOVER BANK ATTORNEY DAVID MULLEN 0089053 NOTICE OF SUBMISSION
  18. EFAULT HEARING SET FOR 09/05/2024 AT 09:30 AM. DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 09/5/2024 AT 09:30 AM. ALL PARTIES AND/OR COUNSEL SHALL APPEAR BY PHONE. THE HEARING SHALL BE HELD BY TELEPHONE. ALL PARTIES AND/OR COUNSEL SHALL APPEAR. PARTIES SHALL CALL THE CONFERENCE NUMBER (978) 990-5135 AND ENTER ACCESS CODE 4088405# AT THE SCHEDULED TIME. DEFENDANT'S FAILURE TO APPEAR WILL RESULT IN JUDGMENT BEING RENDERED AGAINST DEFENDANT. IN ORDER FOR THE DEFAULT HEARING TO PROCEED, PLAINTIFF MUST PROVIDE TO THE COURT: (1) A PROPOSED JUDGMENT ENTRY; (2) AN AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY STATING THAT ACCORDING TO STATUTE AND RULES, SERVICE REQUIREMENTS WERE MET; (3) AN AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY STATING THAT A SEARCH HAS BEEN CONDUCTED AND DEFENDANT IS NOT A CURRENT MEMBER OF THE MILITARY; (4) AN AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF, OR PLAINTIFF'S REPRESENTATIVE, PROVING DAMAGES; AND (5) PROOF OF ASSIGNMENT OR BILL OF SALE. PLAINTIFF SHALL NOTIFY ALL PARTIES AGAINST WHOM DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS SOUGHT OF THE TIME AND DATE OF THE DEFAULT HEARING BY REGULAR AND CERTIFIED MAIL AT LEAST FOURTEEN (14) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING DATE. PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. NOTICE ISSUED
  19. FFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 DISCOVER BANK ATTORNEY DAVID MULLEN 0089053 MILITARY AFFIDAVIT
  20. OTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 09/18/2024 - GRANTED
  21. UMS COMPLAINT(54252023) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: KEIVON GUNN 2114 APPLE DR CLEVELAND, OH 44143 ANSWER DATE: 08/07/2024
  22. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  23. RIT FEE
  24. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED SERVICE VIA ORDINARY MAIL
  25. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 54014147 RETURNED 7/5/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT GUNN/KEIVON/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  26. UMS COMPLAINT(54014147) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: KEIVON GUNN 2114 APPLE DR CLEVELAND, OH 44143
  27. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  28. RIT FEE
  29. UDGE DANIEL GAUL ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  30. EGAL RESEARCH
  31. EGAL NEWS
  32. EGAL AID
  33. OURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  34. OMPUTER FEE
  35. LERK'S FEE
  36. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DAVID MULLEN

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more