Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2024-05-28
Status CLOSED
Type County Civil $30,001 $50,000
Docket 28 entries
Disposition order of dismissal

Parties

Plaintiff Royal Water Damage Inc
Defendant Security First Insurance Company

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE FILED 05/28/2024 CASE NUMBER 2024 CC 003227
  2. ASE CLOSED
  3. RDER OF DISMISSAL
  4. EARING WORKSHEET FILED
  5. LAINTIFFS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS
  6. OTION HEARING SET FOR 10/23/2024 AT 10:00 AM IN DIV III/ , JDG: LIGHTEL, KRISTINA DENISE
  7. OTICE OF HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
  8. EFENDANTS MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY
  9. EFENDANTS MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS CLAIM FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS
  10. EFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT
  11. GREED ORDER ON DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
  12. MAIL CORRESPONDENCE FROM ATTORNEY TO JUDGE
  13. EFENDANT'S ATTORNEY: BERENS, CHLOE E ASSIGNED
  14. EFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
  15. NITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER- GENERAL
  16. OTICE OF FINAL SERVICE
  17. UMMONS RETURNED SERVED
  18. RDER REGARDING REQUIRED REPORTING EMAILED TO ATTORNEY
  19. UMMONS ISSUED EMAILED TO ATTORNEY
  20. AYMENT $410.00 RECEIPT #2024038590
  21. LAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY: RAFULS, RICHARD JOEL ASSIGNED
  22. IGHTEL, KRISTINA DENISE: ASSIGNED
  23. LAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
  24. LAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT
  25. LAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  26. ROPOSED SUMMONS
  27. OMPLAINT
  28. OVER SHEET

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.