Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Florida Civitech Unified Court

Court

Florida Civitech Unified Court

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-05-20
Status OPEN
Type Other Prop Acts $0 $49 K
Docket 20 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Nestle, Paul
Defendant Denomme, Dan
Photo of Hon. X, Judge

Judge

Hon. X, Judge

Florida Civitech Unified Court

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Case 272024CA000481CAAXMX Filed with Clerk on 5/20/2024
  2. ADM ORD-REASSIGN JUDGE
  3. Judge: SCAGLIONE , DONALD E Assigned
  4. ORDER FILED AUTHORIZING SALE OF PROPERTY AND APPOINTING OF SPECIAL MASTER
  5. ORDER FILED GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR FINAL DEFAULT
  6. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL OBO PAUL NESTLE AS HIMSELF AND BENEFIT OF OTHER PARTIAL OWNERS
  7. NOTICE OF HEARING ON 111924 AT 10:30 VIA ZOOM ON PLNTFS MTN FOR FINAL DEFAULT FILED BY PLNTFS
  8. MOTION FOR DEFAULT AGAINST DAN DENOMME
  9. DEFAULT ENTERED BY CLERK AGAINST DAN DENOMME
  10. MOTION FOR DEFAULT AGAINST DAN DENOMME AND DEFAULT (BLANK)
  11. NOTICE OF FILING MARICOPA COUNTY SHERRIF'S OFFICE RETURN OF SERVICE AS TO SUMMONS ON DAN DENOMME, SERVED 062124 (ATTACHED) FILED BY PLNTF
  12. SUMMONS ISSUED FOR: DAN DENOMME
  13. Payment received: $410.00 Receipt Number H 918520
  14. Assessment 1 Total Assessed $410.00 Balance Remaining $0.00
  15. Judge: Assigned
  16. SUMMONS ISSUED FOR DAN DENOMME - BLANK
  17. COMPLAINT FOR QUIET OF TITLE
  18. COVER SHEET
  19. Filer Selected Confidentiality Flag: NoConfidentialInformation
  20. Assessment 1 assessed at sum $410.00

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more