Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Meriden County

Court

Meriden County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-05-30
Type M 83 Misc Small Claims Transfer To Regular Docket
Docket 20 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Donnie Cariati
Defendant City Of Meriden

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SMALL CLAIMS WRIT AND NOTICE OF SUIT, JD-CV-40
  2. PPEARANCE Appearance
  3. MALL CLAIMS WRIT AND NOTICE OF SUIT, JD-CV-40
  4. MALL CLAIMS RETURN / STATEMENT OF SERVICE
  5. OTION TO TRANSFER - SMALL CLAIMS RESULT: Granted 6/11/2024 RUTH BEARDSLEY, MAG Last Updated: Result Information - 06/04/2024
  6. RDER RESULT: Granted 6/11/2024 RUTH BEARDSLEY, MAG
  7. FFIDAVIT Affidavit of Emily Holland
  8. EQUEST TO REVISE
  9. OTION FOR JUDGMENT Motion For Judgment of Nonsuit RESULT: Denied 7/29/2024 HON STEVEN JACOBS
  10. RDER RESULT: Denied 7/29/2024 HON STEVEN JACOBS
  11. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME re Defendant's Request to Revise RESULT: Denied 7/29/2024 HON STEVEN JACOBS
  12. RDER RESULT: Denied 7/29/2024 HON STEVEN JACOBS
  13. EVISED COMPLAINT
  14. OTICE DEFENDANT'S FIRST SETS OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  15. NSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE AND COUNTERCLAIM
  16. EQUEST TO REVISE
  17. BJECTION TO REQUEST TO REVISE RESULT: Sustained 12/2/2024 HON STEVEN JACOBS
  18. RDER RESULT: Sustained 12/2/2024 HON STEVEN JACOBS
  19. LECTRONIC SERVICE NOTICE JD-ES-286
  20. EPLY TO SPECIAL DEFENSE AND ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more