Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-04-16
Status Stay
Type 15 Unlimited Other Employment
Docket 148 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Galarza, Rodolfo|View Document 8.29.24 's Opposition To Defendants' Petition To Compel Arbitration|View Document 8.29.24 Declaration Of Rodolfo Galarza Iso 's Opposition To Motion To Compel Arbitration|View Document 8.29.24 's Objections To Defendants' Evidence In Support Of Petition To Compel Arbitration
Defendant Muniz, Junior|Donaghy Sales, Llc|Donaghy Sales Promotions, Llc|View Document Deposit/payment For Muniz's First Appearance Fee|View Document 8.29.24 Plaintiff's Opposition To S' Petition To Compel Arbitration|View Document 8.29.24 Plaintiff's Objections To S' Evidence In Support Of Petition To Compel Arbitration|View Document 8.29.24 [proposed] Order Re Pltf Objections To S' Evidence Iso Petition To Compel
Photo of Hon. Skiles Jon M

Judge

Hon. Skiles Jon M

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  7. View Document CV-48 Notice of Case Management Conference and Assignment of Judge for All Purposes
  8. Comment Notice of case management conference and assignment of Judge for all purposes
  9. Summons issued and filed
  10. View Document Summons
  11. Notice Filed
  12. View Document 5-24-24 Notice Filed
  13. Comment acknowledgment of receipt (POS-010 not included)
  14. Notice Filed
  15. View Document 5-24-24 Notice Filed
  16. Comment and acknowledgment of receipt (POS-010 not included)
  17. Notice Filed
  18. View Document Notice of Hearing on Petition to Compel Arbitration HRG
  19. Comment Notice of Hearing on Petition to Compel Arbitration
  20. Memorandum of Points and Authorities
  21. View Document Memo re Petition to Compel Arbitration HRG
  22. Comment re Petition to Compel Arbitration HRG
  23. Declaration Filed
  24. View Document Declaration of Jason Shoulet re Petition to Compel Arbitration HRG
  25. Comment Declaration of Jason Shoulet re Petition to Compel Arbitration HRG
  26. Declaration Filed
  27. View Document Declaration of Russell K. Ryan re Petition to Compel Arbitration HRG
  28. Comment Declaration of Russell K. Ryan re Petition to Compel Arbitration HRG
  29. Notice of Hearing
  30. View Document Notice of Hearing
  31. Comment Hearing Reset from Dept. 402 to Dept. 97E
  32. Notice Filed
  33. View Document Deposit/Payment for Defendant Muniz's First Appearance Fee
  34. Comment Deposit/Payment for Defendant Muniz's First Appearance Fee
  35. Chambers Work- Pre
  36. Original Type Chambers Work- Pre
  37. Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel
  38. Hearing Time 5:30 PM
  39. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  40. Case Management Statement Filed
  41. View Document Case Management Statement
  42. Notice of Remote Appearance.
  43. View Document Notice of Remote Appearance
  44. Comment Type of Appearance Requested: CourtCall
  45. Order Received for Signature
  46. View Document Proposed Order
  47. Comment order for : RA
  48. Order Regarding Remote Appearance Granted
  49. View Document Order Regarding Remote Appearance Granted
  50. Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel
  51. Notice of Order on Remote Appearance
  52. Comment Mailed/Emailed to: [email protected]
  53. Transfer of Fees Completed
  54. Comment For WEB-2024-49213
  55. Chambers Work- Pre
  56. Original Type Chambers Work- Pre
  57. Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel
  58. Hearing Time 5:30 PM
  59. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  60. Minute Order Attachment
  61. View Document Minute Order Attachment
  62. Comment from Chambers
  63. Opposition filed
  64. View Document 8.29.24 Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Petition to Compel Arbitration
  65. Comment Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Petition to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action Until Arbitration Proceedings Completed
  66. Declaration Filed
  67. View Document 8.29.24 Declaration of Rodolfo Galarza iso Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Compel Arbitration
  68. Comment Declaration of Rodolfo Galarza In Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration
  69. Objection filed
  70. View Document 8.29.24 Plaintiff's Objections to Defendants' Evidence In Support of Petition to Compel Arbitration
  71. Comment Plaintiff's Objections to Defendants' Evidence In Support of Petition to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action Until Arbitration Proceedings Completed
  72. Order Received for Signature
  73. View Document 8.29.24 [Proposed] Order RE Pltf Objections to Defendants' Evidence Iso Petition to Compel
  74. Comment [Proposed] Order RE Plaintiff's Objections to Defendants' Evidence In Support of Defendants' Petition to Compel Arbitration
  75. Proof of Service
  76. View Document 8.29.24 Proof of Service
  77. Reply filed
  78. View Document Reply Memo in Support of Petition to Compel Arbitration
  79. Comment Reply Memo in Support of Petition to Compel Arbitration
  80. Declaration Filed
  81. View Document Reply Declaration of Russell K .Ryan re Petition to Compel Arbitration
  82. Comment Reply Declaration of Russell K .Ryan re Petition to Compel Arbitration
  83. Request for Judicial Notice
  84. View Document RJN re Petition to Compel Arbitration
  85. Comment re Petition to Compel Arbitration
  86. Notice of Remote Appearance.
  87. View Document Notice of Remote Appearance
  88. Comment Party: Attorney Type of Appearance Requested: CourtCall
  89. Proof of Service
  90. View Document Proof of Service
  91. Petition - Compel Arbitration
  92. Original Type Petition - Compel Arbitration
  93. Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M
  94. Hearing Time 3:27 PM
  95. Result Uncontested
  96. Comment Russel Ryan - filed
  97. Chambers Work - Notice of Remote Appearance
  98. Original Type Chambers Work - Notice of Remote Appearance
  99. Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M
  100. Hearing Time 5:32 PM
  101. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  102. Minute Order Attachment (Tentative Rulings Only)
  103. View Document Civil Document
  104. Comment and CM
  105. Notice of Hearing
  106. View Document Notice of Hearing
  107. Comment Arbitration Status Conference Set
  108. Notice or Order Staying Action
  109. Comment Per Minute Order on
  110. Case Management Conference
  111. Judicial Officer Diaz, Maria G
  112. Hearing Time 3:00 PM
  113. Cancel Reason Off Calendar
  114. Notice Filed
  115. View Document 02.25.25 Notice of Calendar Setting w/CM
  116. Comment Notce of Calendar Setting and CM
  117. Chambers Work- Pre
  118. Original Type Chambers Work- Pre
  119. Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M
  120. Hearing Time 6:00 AM
  121. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  122. Minute Order Attachment
  123. View Document 4.15.25 Minute Order Attachment & CM
  124. Comment and CM
  125. On Courts own motion - remote appearance authorized
  126. Comment for the next Arbitration Status Conference
  127. Notice of Remote Appearance.
  128. View Document Notice of Remote Appearance
  129. Comment Party: Plaintiff Type of Appearance Requested: Zoom
  130. Chambers Work - Notice of Remote Appearance
  131. Original Type Chambers Work - Notice of Remote Appearance
  132. Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M
  133. Hearing Time 5:32 PM
  134. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  135. Arbitration Status Conference
  136. Original Type Arbitration Status Conference
  137. Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M
  138. Hearing Time 3:28 PM
  139. Result Heard
  140. Remote Appearance Via Zoom
  141. Minute Order Attachment
  142. View Document 5.22.25 Minute Order Attachment & CM
  143. Comment and CM
  144. On Courts own motion - remote appearance authorized
  145. Comment for the next hearing
  146. Arbitration Status Conference
  147. Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M
  148. Hearing Time 3:28 PM

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more