Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Waterbury County

Court

Waterbury County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-05-28
Type V 05 Vehicular Motor Vehicles Property Damage Only
Docket 65 entries

Parties

Plaintiff City Of Waterbury
Defendant Jamil Lawrence|Jasmine J Romanauskas Rivera|John Denker|Janet Alexander|Carl Alexander|Joel M Cross|Removed|Roberto A Ortiz|Removed

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. ADDITIONAL PARTIES PAGE
  4. PPEARANCE Appearance
  5. PPEARANCE Appearance
  6. PPEARANCE Appearance
  7. PPEARANCE Appearance
  8. PPEARANCE Appearance
  9. ETURN OF SERVICE
  10. MENDED RETURN
  11. OTION FOR DEFAULT -FAILURE TO APPEAR PB 17-20 RESULT: Granted 8/7/2024 BY THE CLERK
  12. RDER RESULT: Granted 8/7/2024 BY THE CLERK
  13. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116)
  14. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13
  15. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SCHEDULING ORDER MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A PROPOSED JOINT SCHEDULING ORDER
  16. EQUEST TO REVISE
  17. CHEDULING ORDER BY AGREEMENT C50,T02,T03,T11,T12,T61,V01,V04, V09 CASES Scheduling Order By Agreement
  18. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 10/8/2024 HON CARLETHA PARKINSON
  19. RDER RESULT: Granted 10/8/2024 HON CARLETHA PARKINSON
  20. OTICE of Service of Discovery as to John Denker
  21. OTICE of Service of Discovery as to Janet Alexander and Carl Alexander
  22. OTICE of Service of Discovery as to Joel M. Cross and Roberto A. Ortiz
  23. OTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL INTERROGATORIES PB SEC 13-6(b) as to the City of Waterbury RESULT: Order 10/8/2024 HON CARLETHA PARKINSON
  24. RDER RESULT: Order 10/8/2024 HON CARLETHA PARKINSON
  25. ITHDRAWAL OF MOTION
  26. OTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL INTERROGATORIES PB SEC 13-6(b) as to the City of Waterbury RESULT: Order 10/8/2024 HON CARLETHA PARKINSON
  27. RDER RESULT: Order 10/8/2024 HON CARLETHA PARKINSON
  28. ITHDRAWAL IN PART
  29. EVISED COMPLAINT
  30. ERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
  31. BJECTION TO MOTION PT?S OBJ. TO DEF'S MOTN FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADD. INTER. & REQ. FOR PROD. UPON PT. RESULT: Sustained 10/8/2024 HON CARLETHA PARKINSON
  32. RDER RESULT: Sustained 10/8/2024 HON CARLETHA PARKINSON
  33. OTION FOR ORDER OF COMPLIANCE – PB SEC 13-14 (INTERR/PROD – 13-6/13-9)
  34. OTICE OF COMPLIANCE PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH DEFENDANT?S DISCOVERY REQUEST
  35. OTICE PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION
  36. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 RESULT: Granted 11/12/2024 HON CARLETHA PARKINSON
  37. RDER RESULT: Granted 11/12/2024 HON CARLETHA PARKINSON
  38. OTION FOR DEFAULT-FAILURE TO PLEAD RESULT: Denied 11/14/2024 BY THE CLERK
  39. RDER RESULT: Denied 11/14/2024 BY THE CLERK
  40. LAIM FOR JURY OF 6
  41. NSWER
  42. EQUEST TO REVISE by Lawrence and Romanauskas
  43. EQUEST TO REVISE Defendant Alexander
  44. OTICE OF COMPLIANCE PT?S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE w. DEF?S JAMIL LAWRENCE & JASMINE J. ROMANAUSKAS-RIVERA D&P REQ.
  45. BJECTION TO REQUEST TO REVISE PT's OBJECTION TO DEFS. LAWRENCE & ROMANAUSKAS-RIVERA REQUEST TO REVISE RESULT: Sustained 1/7/2025 HON CARLETHA PARKINSON
  46. RDER RESULT: Sustained 1/7/2025 HON CARLETHA PARKINSON
  47. BJECTION TO REQUEST TO REVISE PT'S OBJECTION TO DEFS JANET ALEXANDER & CARL ALEXANDER REQUEST TO REVISE RESULT: Overruled 1/7/2025 HON CARLETHA PARKINSON
  48. RDER RESULT: Overruled 1/7/2025 HON CARLETHA PARKINSON
  49. EVISED COMPLAINT PT'S SECOND REVISED COMPLAINT
  50. OTION FOR ORDER OF COMPLIANCE – PB SEC 13-14 (INTERR/PROD – 13-6/13-9)
  51. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 RESULT: Granted 2/10/2025 HON CARLETHA PARKINSON
  52. RDER RESULT: Granted 2/10/2025 HON CARLETHA PARKINSON
  53. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 RESULT: Granted 3/19/2025 HON CARLETHA PARKINSON
  54. RDER RESULT: Granted 3/19/2025 HON CARLETHA PARKINSON
  55. OTION FOR JUDGMENT MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF NONSUIT RESULT: Off 3/19/2025 HON CARLETHA PARKINSON
  56. RDER RESULT: Off 3/19/2025 HON CARLETHA PARKINSON
  57. BJECTION TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME PT'S OBJECTION TO DEF?S THIRD MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY REQ. RESULT: Overruled 3/19/2025 HON CARLETHA PARKINSON
  58. RDER RESULT: Overruled 3/19/2025 HON CARLETHA PARKINSON
  59. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13
  60. OTICE OF COMPLIANCE
  61. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116)
  62. NSWER
  63. RDER RESULT: Order 5/5/2025 HON JOHN CORDANI
  64. OTICE OF COMPLIANCE CARL ALEXANDER
  65. NSWER ANSWER TO SECOND REVISED COMPLAINT

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more