Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Nevada Appeal Court

Court

Nevada Appeal Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-02
Status Case Closed
Type Civil Appeal Family Law Proper Person
Docket 21 entries
Disposition affirmance

Docket Entries

  1. Transferred from Supreme Court (COA).
  2. Filed Proper Person (Raymond Snyder) Document - Complaint Against Judges, Attorneys, and Sherriff's. (TRANSFERRED FROM THE SUPREME COURT PER 05/17/2024) (COA)
  3. Filed Proper Person Document - Appellant's NRCP Rule 60, on Just Terms, Amendment to His Rule 56 Motion for Summary Judgment for Respondents' Failure to Respond. (TRANSFERRED FROM THE SUPREME COURT PER 05/17/2024) (FLASH DRIVE RETURNED UNFILED PER 5/30/24 ORDER). (COA)
  4. Filed Order Denying Motions and Regarding Record on Appeal. Appellant has filed a copy of a pro se letter addressed to the Nevada Attorney General, the United States Department of Justice, and the Fourth Judicial District Court. No action will be taken on the letter. The clerk shall return the thumb drive submitted with the letter. Appellant has also filed "Appellant's NRCP Rule 60, on Just Terms, Amendment to his Rule 56 Motion for Summary Judgment for Respondents' Failure to Respond" (hereinafter "NRCP 60(b) motion"), and a "Notice of Collusion Motion to Refile Motions as Notice of Collusion." The relief sought in appellant's motion and notice is denied. The district court clerk shall have 7 days from the date of this order to file in this court an amended certification of the record on appeal. (COA)
  5. Filed Proper Person (Raymond Max Snyder) Motion - Request for Email Notice. (COA)
  6. Filed Proper Person's Proof of Service for Complaint Against Judges, Attorneys, and Sherriff's. (COA)
  7. iled Proper Person Motion - Fraud on the Court, Forgery, Filing a False Certificate of Service, and Request for Summary Judgment. (COA)
  8. iled Proper Person Objection to Granting Motion to Place Plaintiff on Vexatious Litigant List and Request to Vacate (SC)
  9. iled Proper Person Amended Objection to Granting Motion to Place Plaintiff on Vexatious Litigant List and Request to Vacate and NRCP Rule 59(e) Motion to Vacate the Vexatious Order and Court's Dismissal with Prejudice and enter Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Nev. R. CIV. P. Rule 56 (COA)
  10. iled Order. No cause appearing, appellant's pro se motion for summary judgment is denied. Appellant's pro se "Objection to Granting Motion to Place Plaintiff on Vexatious Litigant List and Request to Vacate" and "Amended Objection to Granting Motion to Place Plaintiff on Vexatious Litigant List and Request to Vacate and NRCP Rule 59(e) Motion to Vacate the Vexatious Order and Court's Dismissal with Prejudice and Enter Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Nev. R. Civ. P Rule 56" are also denied. Appellant has additionally filed a pro se request for email notification of all pleadings and documents. To the extent appellant requests that respondents be required to serve him with documents via email, the motion is denied. But, in light of appellant's motion, respondents may serve appellant via email, if they so choose. On May 29, 2024, this court entered an order directing the district court clerk to file an amended certification of the record on appeal by June 5, 2024. To date, the clerk has failed to comply or otherwise communicate with this court. The district court clerk shall have 7 days from the date of this order to file and serve an amended certification of the record on appeal as directed in this court's order. (COA)
  11. iled Amended Clerk's Certificate (COA)
  12. iled Order Directing Filing of Second Amended Certification. The clerk of the district court shall have 7 days from the date of this order to file in this court a second amended certification of the record on appeal in compliance with this court's May 29, 2024, order. The second amended certification must certify that the record on appeal transmitted to this court contains true, full, and accurate copies of all documents filed or submitted for filing in the district court in district court case DC-CV-23-151. (COA).
  13. iled District Court's Record on Appeal - Second Amended Clerk's Certification. (COA)
  14. iled Proper Person (Raymond Max Snyder) Notice of Collusion Adding the Fourth Judicial District Court, Court Clerks, and Judge Kriston N. Hill, and Motion to Order the Fourth Judicial District Court to File All Documentation/Exhibits in the Case, and Request for the Court to Find in Appellant's Favor and Remand Back to the District Court to Enter Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgement. (COA)
  15. iled Order Denying Motion. Appellant has filed a pro se motion seeking, among other things, an order directing the district court to file all documentation and exhibits in this case, finding in appellant's favor in this appeal, and remanding to the district court. The motion is denied. The clerk shall return the flash drive submitted with appellant's motion. (COA)
  16. iled Proper Person Notice of Complaint to the Office of the Nevada Attorney Generals Office. (COA)
  17. iled Proper Person Notice - Objection to Second Amended Clerk's Certification. (COA)
  18. eturned Unfiled Document - Notice of Motion for Summary and Default Judgment in U.S. District Court, District of Nevada, Pursuant to Collusion and Fraud on the Court. (COA)
  19. iled Proper Person Document "Request for Directions." (COA).
  20. iled Order of Affirmance. "We affirm the district court's order dismissing the complaint for an independent action challenging the original divorce decree with prejudice." COA-MG/BB/DW. (COA)
  21. ransferred to Supreme Court.(COA)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more