Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Travis County

Court

Travis County

Texas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-02-09
Status Open
Type Other Employment
Docket 81 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Medeles, San Juanita
Defendant Cave, Joe
Photo of Hon. 459 Th, District Court

Judge

Hon. 459 Th, District Court

Travis County

Texas

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. RESPONSE TMD DEFENDANTS SECOND PLEA TO THE JURISDICTION Party: Defendant CAVE, JOE; Defendant FITZGERALD, DARREN; Defendant JIMMERSON, JEANETTE
  3. PLEADING PLAINTIFF S AMENDED ORIGINAL PETITION Party: Plaintiff MEDELES, SAN JUANITA
  5. OTHER/NOTICE PROCESS REQUEST FORM CITATION-4 DF'S (CONSTABLE)
  7. EXECUTED SERVICE EXECUTED RETURN SERVICE OF CITATION - DARREN FITZGERALD Party: Plaintiff MEDELES, SAN JUANITA
  9. OTHER/NOTICE PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED ORIGINAL PETITION -DARREN FITZ GERALD (CONSTABLE SERVICE )
  11. EXECUTED SERVICE EXECUTED RETURN SERVICE OF CITATION - TEXAS MILITARY DEPARTMENT - TEXAS STATE GUARD Party: Plaintiff MEDELES, SAN JUANITA
  13. EXECUTED SERVICE EXECUTED RETURN SERVICE OF CITATION - JEANETTE JIMMERSON Party: Plaintiff MEDELES, SAN JUANITA
  15. EXECUTED SERVICE EXECUTED RETURN SERVICE OF CITATION - JOE CAVE Party: Plaintiff MEDELES, SAN JUANITA
  17. EXECUTED SERVICE EXECUTED RETURN SERVICE OF CITATION -DARREN FITZGERALD Party: Plaintiff MEDELES, SAN JUANITA
  19. ORIGINAL ANSWER/WAIVER DEFENDANTS ANSWER AND DEFENSES Party: Defendant CAVE, JOE; Defendant FITZGERALD, DARREN; Defendant JIMMERSON, JEANETTE; Defendant TEXAS MILITARY DEPARTMENT - TEXAS STATE GUARD
  21. PLEADING PLAINTIFF'S 2ND AMENDED PETITION Party: Plaintiff MEDELES, SAN JUANITA
  23. PLEADING PLAINTIFF S 3rd AMENDED ORIGINAL PETITION Party: Plaintiff MEDELES, SAN JUANITA
  25. MOTION PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Party: Plaintiff MEDELES, SAN JUANITA
  27. MOTION PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Party: Plaintiff MEDELES, SAN JUANITA
  29. MOTION PLAINTIFF'S 2ND AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Party: Plaintiff MEDELES, SAN JUANITA
  31. OTHER/NOTICE EXHIBIT LIST 1-31 OF PLAINTIFF S 2nd AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  33. OTHER/NOTICE NOTICE OF IN-PERSON COURT PROCEEDING ON THE CENTRAL DOCKET Party: Plaintiff MEDELES, SAN JUANITA
  35. ORIGINAL ANSWER/WAIVER DEFENDANTS PLEA TO THE JURISDICTION Party: Defendant CAVE, JOE; Defendant FITZGERALD, DARREN; Defendant JIMMERSON, JEANETTE; Defendant TEXAS MILITARY DEPARTMENT - TEXAS STATE GUARD
  37. MOTION DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE Party: Defendant CAVE, JOE; Defendant FITZGERALD, DARREN; Defendant JIMMERSON, JEANETTE; Defendant TEXAS MILITARY DEPARTMENT - TEXAS STATE GUARD
  39. OTHER/NOTICE NOTICE OF HEARING ON DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE Party: Defendant CAVE, JOE; Defendant FITZGERALD, DARREN; Defendant JIMMERSON, JEANETTE; Defendant TEXAS MILITARY DEPARTMENT - TEXAS STATE GUARD
  41. OTHER/NOTICE NOTICE OF HEARING ON DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE Party: Defendant CAVE, JOE; Defendant FITZGERALD, DARREN; Defendant JIMMERSON, JEANETTE; Defendant TEXAS MILITARY DEPARTMENT - TEXAS STATE GUARD
  43. OTHER/NOTICE NOTICE OF HEARING ON DEFENDANTS PLEA TO THE JURISDICTION Party: Defendant CAVE, JOE; Defendant FITZGERALD, DARREN; Defendant JIMMERSON, JEANETTE; Defendant TEXAS AIR NATIONAL GUARD; Defendant TEXAS MILITARY DEPARMENT; Defendant TEXAS MILITARY DEPARTMENT - TEXAS STATE GUARD
  45. RESPONSE DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF S SECOND AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Party: Defendant CAVE, JOE; Defendant FITZGERALD, DARREN; Defendant JIMMERSON, JEANETTE; Defendant TEXAS MILITARY DEPARTMENT - TEXAS STATE GUARD
  47. RESPONSE PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S PLEA TO JURISDICTION Party: Plaintiff MEDELES, SAN JUANITA
  49. RESPONSE DEFENDANTS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR PLEA TO THE JURISDICTION Party: Defendant CAVE, JOE; Defendant FITZGERALD, DARREN; Defendant JIMMERSON, JEANETTE; Defendant TEXAS AIR NATIONAL GUARD; Defendant TEXAS MILITARY DEPARMENT; Defendant TEXAS MILITARY DEPARTMENT - TEXAS STATE GUARD
  51. RESPONSE PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' PLEA OF JURISDICTION Party: Plaintiff MEDELES, SAN JUANITA
  53. RESPONSE PLAINTIFF S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS POSITION ON PLAINTIFF S SECOND AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANTS PLEA OF JURISDICTION Party: Plaintiff MEDELES, SAN JUANITA
  55. RESPONSE PLAINTIFF'S 2ND AMENDED RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS PLEA TO THE JURISDICTION Party: Plaintiff MEDELES, SAN JUANITA
  57. RESPONSE DEFENDANTS SUR REPLY TO PLANTIFF S OBJECTIONS RESPONSE Party: Defendant CAVE, JOE; Defendant FITZGERALD, DARREN; Defendant JIMMERSON, JEANETTE; Defendant TEXAS AIR NATIONAL GUARD; Defendant TEXAS MILITARY DEPARMENT; Defendant TEXAS MILITARY DEPARTMENT - TEXAS STATE GUARD
  59. JUDGMENT NOTICE MAILED
  61. FINAL OR PARTIAL DISPOSITION ORDER (Judicial Officer: CRUMP, KARIN) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  63. FINAL OR PARTIAL DISPOSITION ORDER (Judicial Officer: CRUMP, KARIN) ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' PLEA TO THE JURISDICTION
  65. REQUEST FINDINGS FACT CNCL LAW REQUEST FOR FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON DENYING OF PLAINTIFF S SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART OF PLEAS TO THE JURISDICTION Party: Plaintiff MEDELES, SAN JUANITA
  66. COURT CORRESPONDENCE LETTER TO COUNSEL FROM JUDGE CRUMP
  67. NOTICE OF APPEAL NOTICE OF APPEAL Party: Plaintiff MEDELES, SAN JUANITA
  68. OTHER/NOTICE LETTER FROM 3RD COA
  69. OTHER/NOTICE CLERK REPORT REQUEST
  70. OTHER/NOTICE COURT REPORTER RECORD REQUEST
  71. BILL OF COST CRT COST/FINE BILL OF COST FOR CLERKS RECORD ON APPEAL
  72. OTHER/NOTICE RECEIPT FOR DELIVERY OF CLERKS RECORD TO 3RD COURT OF APPEALS
  73. OTHER/NOTICE LETTER FROM 3RD COA
  74. OTHER/NOTICE RECEIPT FOR DELIVERY OF SUPPLEMENTAL CLERKS RECORD TO 3RD COURT OF APPEALS
  75. OTHER/NOTICE LETTER- FROM 3RD COA
  76. OTHER/NOTICE MEMORANDUM OPINION FROM 3RD COA
  77. ORDER JUDGMENT FROM 3RD COA
  78. OTHER/NOTICE VACATION LETTER- OAG
  79. OTHER/NOTICE VACATION LETTER NOTICE- OAG
  80. OTHER/NOTICE LETTER REGARDING NOTICE OF HEARING
  81. PLEADING PLAINTIFF S 4th AMENDED ORIGINAL PETITION Party: Plaintiff MEDELES, SAN JUANITA

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more