Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-03-07
Type Interpleader Over $10,000.00
Docket 58 entries
Photo of Hon. King Timothy

Judge

Hon. King Timothy

Muskogee County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. FILE & ENTRY PETITON
  2. LAW LIBRARY
  3. DISPUTE MEDIATION ASSESSMENT
  4. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
  5. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  6. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  7. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  9. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  10. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  11. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  12. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  13. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  14. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  15. SUMMONS ISSUED TO ATTORNEY FOR SERVICE BY CERT. MAIL
  16. SUMMONS ISSUED TO ATTORNEY FOR SERVICE BY CERT. MAIL
  17. SUMMONS ISSUED TO ATTORNEY FOR SERVICE BY CERT. MAIL
  18. SUMMONS ISSUED TO ATTORNEY FOR SERVICE BY CERT. MAIL
  19. SUMMONS ISSUED TO ATTORNEY FOR SERVICE BY CERT. MAIL
  20. SUMMONS ISSUED TO ATTORNEY FOR SERVICE BY CERT. MAIL
  21. SUMMONS ISSUED TO ATTORNEY FOR SERVICE BY CERT. MAIL
  22. SUMMONS ISSUED TO ATTORNEY FOR SERVICE BY CERT. MAIL
  23. SUMMONS ISSUED TO ATTORNEY FOR SERVICE BY CERT. MAIL
  24. SUMMONS ISSUED TO ATTORNEY FOR SERVICE BY CERT. MAIL
  25. SUMMONS ISSUED TO ATTORNEY FOR SERVICE BY CERT. MAIL
  26. SUMMONS ISSUED TO ATTORNEY FOR SERVICE BY CERT. MAIL
  27. COURT REPORTER FEE
  28. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  29. RESPONSE OF MUSKOGEE COUNTY EMS
  30. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  31. ANSWER
  32. ENTRY AND ANSWER TO INTERPLEADER
  33. ENTRY AND ANSWER TO INTERPLEADER
  34. ANSWER
  35. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  36. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AND RESERVATION OF TIME TO ANSWER
  37. DEFENDENT RYAN MARSHALL, PLLC'S ANSWER TO PETITION FOR
  38. INTERPLEADER
  39. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  40. AFFIDAVIT AND RETURN OF SERVICE BY CERT MAIL
  41. AFFIDAVIT AND RETURN OF SERVICE BY CERT MAIL
  42. AFFIDAVIT AND RETURN OF SERVICE BY CERT MAIL
  43. AFFIDAVIT AND RETURN OF SERVICE BY CERT MAIL
  44. AFFIDAVIT AND RETURN OF SERVICE BY CERT MAIL
  45. AFFIDAVIT AND RETURN OF SERVICE BY CERT MAIL
  46. AFFIDAVIT AND RETURN OF SERVICE BY CERT MAIL
  47. AFFIDAVIT AND RETURN OF SERVICE BY CERT MAIL
  48. AFFIDAVIT AND RETURN OF SERVICE BY CERT MAIL
  49. AFFIDAVIT AND RETURN OF SERVICE BY CERT MAIL
  50. AFFIDAVIT AND RETURN OF SERVICE BY CERT MAIL
  51. AFFIDAVIT AND RETURN OF SERVICE BY CERT MAIL
  52. ORDER SETTING HEARING
  53. SPOKE WITH KIM @ RICHARDSON & RICHARDSON & THIS CASE IS
  54. STRICKEN. GAVE NEW DATES & SHE WILL COORDINATE WITH
  55. ALL PARTIES & RESET. TK
  56. ORDER SETTING HEARING
  57. PER KIM AT RICHARDSON LAW, THIS CASE SET ON 10-04-22 IS
  58. STRICKEN. THE PARTIES HAVE REACHED AN AGREEMENT. TK

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more