Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-05-02
Status Pending
Type 22 Cv Auto Civil Unlimited
Docket 55 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Glover Warren, Daniel Michael
Defendant City Of Bakersfield|Aguilera, Neli Enriqueta|Cole, Garrett Tyler|Uber Technologies, Inc|Rasier, Llc|Rasier Ca, Llc
Photo of Hon. Barmann Bernard C Jr

Judge

Hon. Barmann Bernard C Jr

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 03/22/2024 Hearing Time: 8:30 am Hearing Department/Division: J
  2. Served 03/22/202412:13 PM Unserved Served 03/22/202411:59 AM Served 03/22/202411:59 AM Served 03/24/20244:27 PM Served 03/31/20248:25 AM
  3. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) View Document Order to Show Cause - CRC 3.110 03/22/2024 Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held
  4. Comment Plaintiff's Case Management Statement, 6/05/24. 8:30 a.m., Div. J (No Proof of Svc. Attached)
  5. Comment as to Rasier LLC, via personal service
  6. Comment as to Rasier-CA, LLC, via personal service
  7. Comment as to Neli Enriqueta Aguilera via personal service
  8. Comment as to City of Bakersfield via personal service
  9. Comment as to Garrett Tyler Cole via personal service
  10. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment re; Proof of Service
  11. Comment Defendant's Notice of Deposit and Demand for Jury Trial
  12. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Rejected per conversation today 05/02/2024. Will re-submit with signatures.
  13. Action Cross-Complaint File Date 05/02/2024
  14. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  15. Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment cont'd from 03/22/24
  24. Comment Without Prejudice as to the Cross-Complaint filed 05/02/2024
  25. Comment Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, Llc, And Rasier-ca, Llc's Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Arbitration And Dismiss Or Stay Proceedings Against Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, Llc, And Rasier-ca, Llc (Motions)
  26. Comment Declaration Of Todd Gaddis In Support Of Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, Llc, And Rasier-ca, Llc's Motion To Compel Arbitration And Dismiss Or Stay Proceedings Against Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, Llc, And Rasier-ca, Llc (Declarations)
  27. Comment Declaration Of Lisa Herme In Support Of Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, Llc, And Rasier-ca, Llc's Motion To Compel Arbitration And To Dismiss To Stay The Action Pending Completion Of Arbitration (Declarations)
  28. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT: Outdated form, please use CM-110 with date Rev. January 1, 2024
  29. Comment for Defendant, Neli Enriqueta Aguilera
  30. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT: Incorrect court address, Incorrect hearing date and Division. Please review.
  31. Comment for Defendant, Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC, Rasier-CA, LLC
  32. Comment for Defendant, City of Bakersfield
  33. View Document Order to Show Cause - CRC 3.110 & CMC 09/11/2024 Judicial Officer Barmann, Bernard C., Jr. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment continued from 06/05/2024
  34. View Document Order to Show Cause - CRC 3.110 & CMC 09/11/2024 Judicial Officer Barmann, Bernard C., Jr. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment continued from 03/22/2024, 06/05/2024
  35. Comment Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC, and Rasier-CA, LLC's notice of non-opposition to defendants' motion to compel arbitration and to stay the court action as to Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC, and Rasier-CA, LLC
  36. Comment for Defendant, Neli Enriqueta Aguilera
  37. Comment Without Prejudice as to Uber Technologies, Inc; Raiser, LLC; Raiser-CA, LLC, ONLY
  38. Comment Notice of Taking Motion Off Calendar as to the October 2, 2024 motion hearing
  39. Judicial Officer Barmann, Bernard C., Jr. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Other Comment Filed 8/1/24. Defendant's Uber Tech., Rasier LLC and Rasier-CA LLC. Motion to compel arbitration and dismiss or stay processing against Uber Tech., Rasier LLC and Rasier-CA LLC
  40. Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 9:00 AM Comment FCMC: 01/30/2026 // JT: 02/02/2026 // T/E: 7-10 DAYS (D-H)
  41. Judicial Officer Barmann, Bernard C., Jr. Hearing Time 01:30 PM Comment Jury Trial 02/02/26 T/E: 7-10 days
  42. Judicial Officer Barmann, Bernard C., Jr. Hearing Time 9:00 AM Comment T/E: 7-10 days (Def. City of Bakersfield and Garrett Tyler Cole jury)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more