Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-04-04
Status Judgment
Type Dafs
Docket 28 entries
Disposition entry of judgment

Parties

Plaintiff County Of Fresno
Defendant Pinon, Justin Jerry
Photo of Hon. Judicial Officer fogarty, Katherine

Judge

Hon. Judicial Officer fogarty, Katherine

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Proof of Service Comment Personal Service on Justin Jerry Pinon on
  2. Filed Complaint Issued Summons
  3. Paternity
  4. Proof of Service Comment Served: Justin Jerry Pino on
  5. Answer Filed Family Support
  6. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the (FL-610) was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on () . Parties served: (DCSS )
  7. Notice of Motion Comment Judgment, CS, Health Care, Parentage, Genetic Testing, Join other Parent / Hrg: @ 8am Dept 302
  8. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Party Served:Justin Jerry Pinon and Megan Lira Date Mailed:
  9. Motion for Entry of Judgment Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Party's Motion Parties Present Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  10. Motion Child Support Original Type Motion Child Support Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Party's Motion Parties Present Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  11. Motion - Health Care Original Type Motion - Health Care Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Party's Motion Parties Present Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  12. General Motion Original Type General Motion Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Party's Motion Comment Parentage Parties Present Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  13. Motion - Genetic Test Original Type Motion - Genetic Test Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Party's Motion Parties Present Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  14. Motion - Joinder Original Type Motion - Joinder Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Comment Join other Parent Parties Present Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  15. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Served: Justin Jerry Pinon / Mailed on
  16. Motion for Entry of Judgment Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Comment cont. pending GT results
  17. Motion Child Support Original Type Motion Child Support Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard
  18. Motion - Health Care Original Type Motion - Health Care Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard
  19. Motion - Genetic Test Original Type Motion - Genetic Test Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard
  20. General Motion Original Type General Motion Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Comment Parentage Parties Present Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  21. Appeared in Person
  22. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Date mailed: Served: Justin Jerry Pinon & Megan Lira
  23. Motion Child Support Original Type Motion Child Support Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Comment Cont from for Resp to submit to gen testing/Resp missed 4 appts/RJ 5/1/24/7551 advisement
  24. Motion for Entry of Judgment Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard
  25. Motion - Health Care Original Type Motion - Health Care Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard
  26. Genetic Test Original Type Genetic Test Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard
  27. General Motion Original Type General Motion Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Comment (Parentage) Parties Present Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  28. Appeared in Person

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more