Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of New Britain County

Court

New Britain County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-05-10
Type T 61 Torts Animals Dog
Docket 42 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Hannah Spring
Defendant Kacey Wentland|Daniel Nadeau

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. PPEARANCE Appearance
  4. ETURN OF SERVICE
  5. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 7/8/2024 HON LISA MORGAN
  6. RDER RESULT: Granted 7/8/2024 HON LISA MORGAN
  7. LAIM FOR JURY OF 6
  8. OTICE Notice of NonStandard IROGS as to Kacey
  9. OTICE Notice of NonStandard IROGS as to Daniel
  10. OTION FOR DEFAULT-FAILURE TO PLEAD Re: Kacey RESULT: Denied 9/9/2024 BY THE CLERK
  11. RDER RESULT: Denied 9/9/2024 BY THE CLERK
  12. OTION FOR DEFAULT-FAILURE TO PLEAD Re: Daniel RESULT: Denied 9/9/2024 BY THE CLERK
  13. RDER RESULT: Denied 9/9/2024 BY THE CLERK
  14. NSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE
  15. OTION FOR ORDER OF COMPLIANCE – PB SEC 13-14 (INTERR/PROD – 13-6/13-9)
  16. OTICE OF COMPLIANCE
  17. IST OF DOCUMENTS IN LIEU OF THE LIVE TESTIMONY OF AN EXPERT WITNESS
  18. ISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS
  19. BJECTION TO INTERROGATORIES/PRODUCTION PB 13-8 and 13-10 OBJECTION TO QUESTION #1 OF DEFENDANTS? NON-STANDARD INTERROGATORIES AND RQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  20. EPLY TO SPECIAL DEFENSE
  21. ERTIFICATE OF CLOSED PLEADINGS AND CLAIM FOR TRIAL LIST
  22. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 RESULT: Granted 10/15/2024 HON ERIC SMITH
  23. RDER RESULT: Granted 10/15/2024 HON ERIC SMITH
  24. CHEDULING ORDER BY AGREEMENT C50,T02,T03,T11,T12,T61,V01,V04, V09 CASES RESULT: Order 10/1/2024 HON ERIC SMITH
  25. RDER RESULT: Order 10/1/2024 HON ERIC SMITH
  26. OTION FOR ORDER SECOND MOTION FOR COMPLIANCE
  27. RDER RESULT: Off 10/15/2024 HON ERIC SMITH
  28. BJECTION TO INTERROGATORIES/PRODUCTION PB 13-8 and 13-10 Defendant's Objections to the Plaintiff's Interrogatories & Request for Production
  29. OTION FOR ORDER RESULT: Order 10/21/2024 HON ERIC SMITH
  30. RDER RESULT: Order 10/21/2024 HON ERIC SMITH
  31. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) RESULT: Granted 10/23/2024 HON ERIC SMITH
  32. RDER RESULT: Granted 10/23/2024 HON ERIC SMITH
  33. OTION TO CONSOLIDATE RESULT: Order 1/21/2025 HON ERIC SMITH
  34. RDER RESULT: Order 1/21/2025 HON ERIC SMITH
  35. OTION TO CONSOLIDATE RESULT: Granted 3/17/2025 HON ERIC SMITH
  36. RDER RESULT: Granted 3/17/2025 HON ERIC SMITH
  37. OTION FOR ORDER Third Motion for Compliance RESULT: Order 4/8/2025 HON ERIC SMITH
  38. RDER RESULT: Order 4/8/2025 HON ERIC SMITH
  39. OTICE OF COMPLIANCE
  40. OTICE OF COMPLIANCE supplemental
  41. BJECTION TO MOTION for Order of Compliance
  42. EPLY

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more