Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Napa County Superior

Court

Napa County Superior

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-05-09
Status Dismissed
Type Civil Harassment
Docket 53 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Olteanu, Andreea
Photo of Hon. Stamps, Robert

Judge

Hon. Stamps, Robert

Napa County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. 05/09/2024 Request: Order to Stop Civil Harassment
  2. 05/09/2024 Declaration Comment Re: Notice
  3. 05/09/2024 Civil Case Cover Sheet
  4. 05/10/2024 Notice of Hearing
  5. Notice of Hearing
  6. Proof of Personal Service- GV
  7. Appendix
  8. Comment ERIC F. GONZALES APPENDIX OF SUPPORTING EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF HIS RESPONSE TO ANDREEA OLTEANUS REQUEST FOR CIVIL HARASSMENT RESTRAINING ORDER (Appendix)
  9. Request
  10. Comment ERIC F. GONZALES REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF HIS RESPONSE TO ANDREEA OLTEANUS REQUEST FOR CIVIL HARASSMENT RESTRAINING ORDER (Requests)
  11. Response or Reply
  12. Comment ERIC F. GONZALES RESPONSE TO ANDREEA OLTEANUS REQUEST FOR CIVIL HARASSMENT RESTRAINING ORDER (Responses)
  13. Order to Show Cause (Non-DCSS)
  14. Original Type Order to Show Cause (Non-DCSS)
  15. Judicial Officer Stamps, Robert
  16. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  17. Result Heard
  18. Comment Civil Harassment PERM RO
  19. Minute Order
  20. Motion
  21. Comment RESPONDENT ERIC F. GONZALES NOTICE AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES (Motions)
  22. Motion
  23. Comment Respondent's Motion for Attorney Fees
  24. Declaration
  25. Comment Declaration of albert Tong in Support of Motion for Attorney's Fees
  26. Notice
  27. Comment RESPONDENT ERIC F. GONZALES NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES (Comment)
  28. Proof of Service
  29. Comment Proof of Service (Comment)
  30. Motion
  31. Original Type Motion
  32. Judicial Officer Smith, Cynthia P
  33. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  34. Result Not Heard
  35. Comment Respondent's Motion for Attorney Fees
  36. Minute Order
  37. Motion
  38. Comment RESPONDENT ERIC F. GONZALES' NOTICE AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES (Motions)
  39. Declaration
  40. Comment DECLARATION OF ALBERT TONG, ESQ. IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENT ERIC F. GONZALES' MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES (Declarations)
  41. Notice of Hearing Court
  42. Notice
  43. Comment Notice of Non-Opposition and Petitioner's Petition for Bankruptcy (Comment)
  44. Motion
  45. Original Type Motion
  46. Judicial Officer Stamps, Robert
  47. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  48. Result Heard
  49. Comment FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES
  50. Minute Order
  51. Minute Order: Amended
  52. Certificate of Mailing
  53. Notice

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more