Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2024-04-25
Type A 10 Appeals Taxation
Docket 16 entries
Disposition judgment by stipulation before trial commenced

Parties

Plaintiff Oronoque Village Condominium Association, Inc.
Defendant Town Of Stratford

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. APPEARANCE Appearance
  2. SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT
  3. RETURN OF SERVICE
  4. ORDER RESULT: Order 5/2/2024 HON THOMAS WELCH
  5. TRANSFERRED FROM SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD (PRE 1/1/24)/BRIDGEPORT (POST 1/1/24)
  6. RANSFERRED TO SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN
  7. NSWER
  8. EQUEST TO REVISE as to Special Defenses
  9. NSWER Revised Answers and Special Defenses
  10. OTION TO MODIFY - GENERAL Plaintiff's Motion to Modify Appraisal Requirement (On Consent) RESULT: Order 8/13/2024 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  11. RDER RESULT: Order 8/13/2024 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  12. EQUEST TO REVISE Pltf's 2nd - as to Dkt. #106.00
  13. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plf. Request to Revise RESULT: Granted 10/21/2024 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  14. RDER RESULT: Granted 10/21/2024 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  15. OTION FOR JUDGMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH STIPULATION RESULT: Granted 11/4/2024 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  16. RDER RESULT: Granted 11/4/2024 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase