Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Millford County

Court

Millford County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-05-02
Type C 00 Contracts Construction All Other
Docket 47 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Sirena Home Improvement, Llc
Defendant Sharon Labansky|Jay Labansky|Newtown Savings Bank|Removed|C&k Electrical, Llc|Non Appearing|Sima Excavating & Landscaping, Llc

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. ADDITIONAL PARTIES PAGE
  4. APPEARANCE Appearance
  5. RETURN OF SERVICE
  6. PPEARANCE Appearance
  7. PPEARANCE Appearance
  8. ETURN OF SERVICE
  9. IS PENDENS
  10. ISCLOSURE OF NO DEFENSE
  11. ITHDRAWAL OF ACTION AGAINST PARTICULAR DEFENDANT(S) – CASE REMAINS PENDING
  12. CHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Order 8/2/2024 HON THEODORE TYMA
  13. RDER RESULT: Order 8/2/2024 HON THEODORE TYMA
  14. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 8/26/2024 HON THEODORE TYMA
  15. RDER RESULT: Granted 8/26/2024 HON THEODORE TYMA
  16. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 8/26/2024 HON THEODORE TYMA
  17. RDER RESULT: Granted 8/26/2024 HON THEODORE TYMA
  18. EQUEST TO REVISE by Defendants Labansky
  19. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 9/30/2024 HON THEODORE TYMA
  20. RDER RESULT: Granted 9/30/2024 HON THEODORE TYMA
  21. BJECTION TO REQUEST TO REVISE RESULT: Sustained 9/30/2024 HON THEODORE TYMA
  22. RDER RESULT: Sustained 9/30/2024 HON THEODORE TYMA
  23. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 10/28/2024 HON THEODORE TYMA
  24. RDER RESULT: Granted 10/28/2024 HON THEODORE TYMA
  25. EQUEST TO REVISE As to Plaintiff
  26. BJECTION TO REQUEST TO REVISE RESULT: Sustained 11/25/2024 HON THEODORE TYMA
  27. RDER RESULT: Sustained 11/25/2024 HON THEODORE TYMA
  28. EVISED COMPLAINT
  29. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 RESULT: Granted 12/9/2024 HON THEODORE TYMA
  30. RDER RESULT: Granted 12/9/2024 HON THEODORE TYMA
  31. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 12/9/2024 HON THEODORE TYMA
  32. RDER RESULT: Granted 12/9/2024 HON THEODORE TYMA
  33. NSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM
  34. ERTIFICATION OF SERVICE As to ANSWER and COUNTERCLAIM/CROSS CLAIM
  35. ETURN OF SERVICE
  36. BJECTION TO INTERROGATORIES/PRODUCTION PB 13-8 and 13-10 Defendant Jay Labansky's Objections to Plaintiff's First Set of Discovery
  37. BJECTION TO INTERROGATORIES/PRODUCTION PB 13-8 and 13-10 Defendant Sharon Labansky's Objections to Plaintiff's First Set of Discovery
  38. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 2/3/2025 HON THEODORE TYMA
  39. RDER RESULT: Granted 2/3/2025 HON THEODORE TYMA
  40. NSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE TO COUNTERCLAIM OR CROSS COMPLAINT
  41. NSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE AND COUNTERCLAIM to Revised Complaint [Doc. No 113]
  42. NSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE TO COUNTERCLAIM OR CROSS COMPLAINT to Sima's Counterclaim
  43. NSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE TO COUNTERCLAIM OR CROSS COMPLAINT as to Labansky's Counterclaim
  44. OTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order RESULT: Granted 2/18/2025 HON THEODORE TYMA
  45. RDER RESULT: Granted 2/18/2025 HON THEODORE TYMA
  46. RDER Civil Trial Management Order RESULT: Order 4/28/2025 HON BARRY STEVENS
  47. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more