Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Docket Entries
- ISSUING AFFIDAVIT & ORDER/SUMMONS
- OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM
- OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
- OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
- STATE JUDICIAL REV FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
- COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
- 10% CASA, COJC, CHS TO REVOLVING FUND
- 15% CASA, COJC, CHS TO DISTRICT COURT REV FUND
- TO BE SERVED BY BECKHAM CO SHF DEPT
- COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
- AJE: COST DUE TO CARD ALLOCATION FEE
- AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
- AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
- AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
- AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
- AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
- AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
- AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
- AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
- AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
- AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
- AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
- AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
- AFFIDAVIT AS TO MILITARY SERVICE
- FILING AFFIDAVIT & ORDER/SUMMONS - SERVED 4/2/24 BY BECKHAM CO SHF
- CM: SBG- THIS MATTER CAME ON FOR HEARING THIS DATE ON PETITION. PETITIONER APPEARED PRO SE. REPONSDENT DID NOT APPEAR AND IS IN DEFAULT. RESPONDENT WAS SERVED WITH NOTICE OF TODAYS HEARING ON 4/2/2024 AT 1324 HOURS AT HUTCH'S IN SAYRE OK (PER RETURN FILED HEREIN). RESPONDENT HAS NOT FILED ANY RESPONSIVE PLEADING. TODAY'S HEARING WAS SCHEDULED TO BEGIN AT 9:00 AM. RESPONDENT CALLED THE COURT AT 8:30 AM AND INDICATED HE THOUGHT COURT WAS AT A DIFFERENT TIME. HE ADVISED HE WAS IN SAYRE, OK WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY 40 MINUTES AWAY FROM THIS COURTHOUSE. HE ADVISED HE WOULD HEAD THIS WAY. THE COURT WAITED UNTIL 10:00 AM 9AN HOUR AFTER SCHEDULED START TIME AND HOUR AND A HALF AFTER HIS PHONE CALL) TO BEGIN THE HEARING. COURT HEARD TESTIMONY OF PETITIONER AND CONSIDERED PHOTOS OF PETITIONER'S ROOF AND TEXT MESSAGES BETWEEN PETITIONER AND RESPONDENT. BASED ON THIS UNDIPSUTED EVIDENCE, COURT GRANTED JUDGEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE PETITIONER PER THE SEPERATE ORDER FILED HEREIN.
- JOURNAL ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (2CC)
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In