Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-12-15
Status Judgment
Type 18 Limited Insurance Coverage Under $10,000
Docket 182 entries
Disposition judgment

Parties

Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company|View Document 2 27 23 Declaration Of In Support Of Entry Of Judgment By Default Ccp 585|View Document 04/01/2024 Declaration Of State Farm Mutual|View Document 2 27 23 Declaration Of In Support Of Entry Of Judgment By Default Ccp 585|View Document 04/01/2024 Declaration Of State Farm Mutual
Defendant Gomez, Anna Laura
Photo of Hon. Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel

Judge

Hon. Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  61. View Document 2-27-23 Request for Dismissal of Does 1-40
  62. Comment Without Prejudice Does: 1-40
  63. Judgment Received
  64. View Document 2-27-23 (Proposed) Judgment
  65. Comment Forwarded to Dept 404 on
  66. Declaration Filed
  67. View Document 2-27-23 Declaration of Richard L. Mahfouz II Regarding Recoverable Costs and CCP 1033
  68. Comment Declaration of Richard L. Mahfouz II Regarding Recoverable Costs and CCP 1033
  69. Declaration Filed
  70. View Document 2-27-23 Declaration of Richard L. Mahfouz II In Support of Entry of Judgment by Default CCP 585
  71. Comment Declaration of Richard L. Mahfouz II In Support of Entry of Judgment by Default CCP 585
  72. Declaration Filed
  73. View Document 2-27-23 Declaration of Plaintiff In Support of Entry of Judgment by Default CCP 585
  74. Comment Declaration of Plaintiff In Support of Entry of Judgment by Default CCP 585
  75. Chambers Work- Pre
  76. Judicial Officer Whalen, Robert
  77. Hearing Time 5:30 PM
  78. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  79. Order Denied
  80. View Document Order Denied
  81. Judicial Officer Negin, Stephanie
  82. Comment Application for Default Judgment
  83. Case Management Statement Filed
  84. View Document Case Management Statement
  85. Case Management Conference
  86. Judicial Officer Mangano, Robert
  87. Hearing Time 3:30 PM
  88. Result Heard
  89. Minute Order Attachment
  90. View Document Minute Order Attachment
  91. Appeared in Person
  92. Comment Attorney M. Johnson appearing on behalf of attorney R. Mahfouz
  93. Request for Court Judgment
  94. View Document -Request for Court Judgment
  95. Comment Judgement
  96. Judgment Received
  97. View Document - Judgment
  98. Comment Forward to: Dept 404 on
  99. Declaration Filed
  100. View Document - DECLARATION OF ASSIGNMENT OF RIGHTS OF STATE FARM MUTUAL AUT
  101. Comment DECLARATION OF MIRACLE OLGUIN IN SUPPORT OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT (CCP585)
  102. Declaration Filed
  103. View Document - DECLARATION OF MIRACLE OLGUIN IN SUPPORT OF ENTRY OF JUDGMEN
  104. Comment DECLARATION OF MIRACLE OLGUIN IN SUPPORT OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT (CCP585)
  105. Case Management Statement Filed
  106. View Document Case Management Statement
  107. Chambers Work- Pre
  108. Original Type Chambers Work- Pre
  109. Judicial Officer Mangano, Robert
  110. Hearing Time 5:30 PM
  111. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  112. Minute Order Attachment
  113. View Document Minute Order Attachment
  114. Comment From Chambers
  115. Chambers Work- Pre
  116. Original Type Chambers Work- Pre
  117. Judicial Officer Whalen, Robert
  118. Hearing Time 5:30 PM
  119. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  120. Order Denied
  121. View Document - Order Denying Application for Default Judgment
  122. Judicial Officer Negin, Stephanie
  123. Comment Order Denying Application for Default Judgment
  124. Notice Filed
  125. View Document Notice of Continued CMC
  126. Comment Notice of Continued CMC
  127. Chambers Work- Pre
  128. Original Type Chambers Work- Pre
  129. Judicial Officer Mangano, Robert
  130. Hearing Time 5:30 PM
  131. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  132. Minute Order Attachment
  133. View Document Minute Order Attachment
  134. Comment Chambers minute order
  135. Case Management Statement Filed
  136. View Document Case Management Statement
  137. Request for Court Judgment
  138. View Document Request for Court Judgment
  139. Judgment Received
  140. View Document Judgment Received
  141. Comment Forwarded to Dept 404 on
  142. Declaration Filed
  143. View Document Assignment of Rights
  144. Comment Assignment of Rights
  145. Chambers Work- Pre
  146. Original Type Chambers Work- Pre
  147. Judicial Officer Whalen, Robert
  148. Hearing Time 5:30 PM
  149. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  150. Order Denied
  151. View Document - Order Denying Application for Default Judgment
  152. Judicial Officer Whalen, Robert
  153. Comment Order Denying Application for Default Judgment
  154. Request for Court Judgment
  155. View Document Request for Entry of Default
  156. Comment Forwarded to: Civil Examiner on
  157. Dismissal Not Entered
  158. View Document Request for Dismissal
  159. Comment Request for dismissal filed. Dismissal not entered as requested for the following reason: Previously dismissed.
  160. Judgment Received
  161. View Document Judgment
  162. Comment Forward to: Dept 404 on
  163. Declaration Filed
  164. View Document Declaration of Assignment of Rights of State Farm Mutual
  165. Comment Of Assignment of Rights of State Farm Mutual
  166. Declaration Filed
  167. View Document Declaration Of Plaintiff State Farm Mutual
  168. Comment Of Plaintiff State Farm Mutual
  169. Declaration Filed
  170. View Document Declaration Of Richard L Mahfouz II In Support of Entry of Judgment by Default
  171. Comment Of Richard L Mahfouz II In Support of Entry of Judgment by Default
  172. Case Management Statement Filed
  173. View Document Case Management Statement
  174. Comment HRG:
  175. Chambers Work- Pre
  176. Original Type Chambers Work- Pre
  177. Judicial Officer Whalen, Robert
  178. Hearing Time 5:30 PM
  179. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  180. Case Management Conference
  181. Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel
  182. Hearing Time 3:00 PM

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more