Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-11-08
Type Ac Breach Of Contract
Docket 19 entries
Disposition consent judgment

Parties

Plaintiff First Community Credit Union|Wool, Tammy Fay
Defendant Ruehlman, Alexander Michael
Photo of Hon. Steimel Norman C Iii

Judge

Hon. Steimel Norman C Iii

St. Charles County (MO)

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. udge Assigned
  2. gmt Transcribed Circuit Court TRANSCRIPT FILED FROM ASSOCIATE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST CHARLES MO.
  3. eq for Transcript Judgment Request to Transcribe Judgment. Filed By: TAMMY FAY WOOL On Behalf Of: FIRST COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION
  5. udgment Entered CONSENT JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF(S) AND AGAINST DEFENDANT(S) IN THE AMOUNT OF $9,578.89 PRINCIPAL, $1,047.24 INTEREST, $1,595.25 ATTORNEY FEES, $12,221.38 COUNT ONE TOTAL PLUS COURT COSTS. SAID JUDGMENT TO BEAR INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 11.24% PER ANNUM. COUNT TWO DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. STAY OF EXECUTION AS PER MEMORANDUM. NCS Filed By: NORMAN C STEIMEL III
  6. onsent Judgment Associated Entries: 11/09/2022 - Civil Setting Scheduled Scheduled For: 12/16/2022; 9:00 AM; NORMAN C STEIMEL III ; 1; St Charles Circuit Div
  7. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  8. ffidavit Filed NMAAffidavit Filed. Filed By: TAMMY FAY WOOL On Behalf Of: FIRST COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION
  9. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  10. amily Member/Roommate Served Document ID - 22-ADSM-4806; Served To - RUEHLMAN, ALEXANDER MICHAEL; Server - ST CHARLES COUNTY SHERIFF; Served Date - 21-NOV-22; Served Time - 16:56:00; Service Type - Sheriff Department; Reason Description - Served; Service Text - SERVED BRETT RUEHLMAN - FATHER
  11. otice of Service 22-ADSM-4806; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
  12. ote to Clerk eFiling
  13. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  14. ummons Issued-Associate Document ID: 22-ADSM-4806, for RUEHLMAN, ALEXANDER MICHAEL. SUMMONS SAVED AND ATTACHED IN PDF FORM FOR ATTORNEY TO RETRIEVE FROM SECURE CASE.NET. AMG
  15. ivil Setting Scheduled Associated Entries: 12/16/2022 - Consent Judgment Scheduled For: 12/16/2022; 9:00 AM; NORMAN C STEIMEL III ; 1; St Charles Circuit Div
  16. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  17. iling Info Sheet eFiling Filed By: TAMMY FAY WOOL
  18. ote to Clerk eFiling Filed By: TAMMY FAY WOOL
  19. et Filed in Associate Ct Petition; Exhibits. Filed By: TAMMY FAY WOOL On Behalf Of: FIRST COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more