Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of New Britain County

Court

New Britain County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-04-25
Type T 90 Torts All Other
Docket 49 entries
Disposition judgment after completed trial to the court - hearing in damages

Parties

Plaintiff Aidan Clingan|F & F Concrete Corporation
Defendant Desiato Sand & Gravel Corporation
Photo of Hon. Joseph Shortall

Judge

Hon. Joseph Shortall

Connecticut

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. PPEARANCE
  4. PPEARANCE Appearance
  5. PPEARANCE Appearance
  6. PPEARANCE Appearance
  7. ETURN OF SERVICE
  8. OTION TO INTERVENE RESULT: Granted 5/29/2024 HON JOSEPH SHORTALL
  9. RDER RESULT: Granted 5/29/2024 HON JOSEPH SHORTALL
  10. OTION FOR DEFAULT -FAILURE TO APPEAR PB 17-20 RESULT: Granted 6/18/2024 BY THE CLERK
  11. RDER RESULT: Granted 6/18/2024 BY THE CLERK
  12. CHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Order 8/13/2024 HON ROBERT YOUNG
  13. RDER RESULT: Order 8/13/2024 HON ROBERT YOUNG
  14. OTION FOR JUDGMENT RESULT: Denied 9/30/2024 HON JASON WELCH
  15. RDER RESULT: Denied 9/30/2024 HON JASON WELCH
  16. ERTIFICATE OF CLOSED PLEADINGS AND CLAIM FOR TRIAL LIST
  17. IST OF EXHIBITS (JD-CL-28/JD-CL-28a)
  18. RDER RESULT: Order 11/20/2024 HON JOSEPH SHORTALL
  19. UDGMENT AFTER COMPLETED TRIAL TO THE COURT - HEARING IN DAMAGES RESULT: HON JOSEPH SHORTALL
  20. OTICE OF JUDGMENT – CERTIFIED/SERVED
  21. PPLICATION FOR EXECUTION FINANCIAL INSTITUTION - NOT NATURAL PERSON/INDIVIDUAL (JD-CV-24N) RESULT: Rejected 1/17/2025 BY THE CLERK
  22. PPEAL TO APPELLATE COURT
  23. OTION TO OPEN JUDGMENT RESULT: Order 5/5/2025 HON JOSEPH SHORTALL
  24. RDER RESULT: Order 4/21/2025 HON JOSEPH SHORTALL
  25. RDER RESULT: Order 5/5/2025 HON JOSEPH SHORTALL
  26. EMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
  27. EMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION
  28. EQUEST FOR ARGUMENT - NON-ARG MATTER (JD-CV-128) ON MOTION TO OPEN JUDGMENT (111.00)
  29. OTION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION OF JUDGMENT RESULT: Granted 3/6/2025 HON JOSEPH SHORTALL
  30. RDER RESULT: Granted 3/6/2025 HON JOSEPH SHORTALL
  31. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) RESULT: Granted 1/27/2025 HON JASON WELCH
  32. RDER RESULT: Granted 1/27/2025 HON JASON WELCH
  33. EPLY to Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Open Judgment
  34. RDER RESULT: Continuance 3/3/2025 HON JOSEPH SHORTALL
  35. OTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER PB 13-5 and Motion to Quash Subpeona, Memorandum of Law, and Exhibit A by Interveining Plaintiff RESULT: Withdrawn 3/10/2025 BY THE PLAINTIFF
  36. OTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER PB 13-5 and Motion to Quash Subpeona, Memorandum of Law and Exhibit A by Intervening Plaintiff RESULT: Withdrawn 3/10/2025 BY THE PLAINTIFF
  37. ITHDRAWAL OF MOTION
  38. EPLY SUPPLEMENT TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFF?S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT?S MOTION TO OPEN JUDGMENT
  39. EMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION opposition to supplement to reply, entry 122.00
  40. OTION TO DISMISS PB 10-30 m/dismiss intervening complaint and the intervention
  41. EMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION mem/support m/dismiss intervention entry 124.00
  42. EMORANDUM OF DECISION
  43. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) RESULT: Granted 4/23/2025 HON JOSEPH SHORTALL
  44. RDER RESULT: Granted 4/23/2025 HON JOSEPH SHORTALL
  45. OTION FOR CLARIFICATION-COURT ORDER m/clarification concerning 127.01 and whether intervenor may be heard at 5.5.25 hearing RESULT: Order 5/1/2025 HON JOSEPH SHORTALL
  46. RDER RESULT: Order 5/1/2025 HON JOSEPH SHORTALL
  47. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) request for expedited ruling on m/clarification entry 128.00 in anticipation of 5.5.25 hearing
  48. BJECTION TO MOTION TO DISMISS INTERVENING COMPLAINT AND INTERVENTION
  49. BJECTION TO PLAINTIFF'S CASEFLOW REQUEST (DOCKET NO. 129.00)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more