Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-04-25
Status INACTIVE
Type Real Property Other
Docket 76 entries

Parties

Plaintiff The Robert M. Brown Revocable Living Trust Ua 083017 Robert M. Brown And Norman C. Brown, Co Trustees
Defendant Zef Om Amen|Sandra Mcgee
Photo of Hon. NANCY MARGARET RUSSO

Judge

Hon. NANCY MARGARET RUSSO

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  2. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  3. WRIT FEE
  4. WRIT FEE
  5. JUDGE NANCY MARGARET RUSSO ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  6. LEGAL RESEARCH
  7. LEGAL NEWS
  8. LEGAL AID
  9. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  10. COMPUTER FEE
  11. CLERK'S FEE
  12. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DUBYAK NELSON, LLC
  13. OTION FILED FOR D1 ZEF OM AMEN JODY MICHELLE OSTER 0041391 MOTION OF DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIMANT ZEF OM AMEN FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR AT NOVEMBER 25, 2024 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE VIA TELEPHONE
  14. OTION FILED FOR P1 THE ROBERT M. BROWN REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST UA 083017 ROBERT J DUBYAK 0059869 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ATTEND FINAL PRETRIAL BY TELEPHONE
  15. RIEF IN OPPOSITION FILED BY P1 THE ROBERT M. BROWN REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST UA 083017 ROBERT J DUBYAK 0059869 PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION OF DEFENDANT ZEF OM AMEN FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  16. OTION FILED FOR D1 ZEF OM AMEN JODY MICHELLE OSTER 0041391 MOTION OF DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIMANT ZEF OM AMEN FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 56
  17. OTICE FILED BY P1 THE ROBERT M. BROWN REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST UA 083017 ATTORNEY ROBERT J DUBYAK 0059869 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT SANDRA MCGEE ONLY WITHOUT PREJUDICE
  18. OTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED MOTION OF PLAINTIFF THE ROBERT M. BROWN REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST UA 083017, ROBERT M. BROWN AND NORMAN C. BROWN, CO-TRUSTEES, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  19. OTION TO EXTEND NON EXPERT DISCOVERY IS DENIED. NOTICE ISSUED
  20. OUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT ADVISED TO REVIEW STANDING ORDERS. THE COURT DOES NOT ACCEPT FAXED COURTESY COPIES. COURTESY COPIES ARE TO BE PROVIDED TO THE COURT ON ALL PLEADINGS IN EXCESS OF 5 PAGES. NOTICE ISSUED
  21. BJECTION FILED BY D1 ZEF OM AMEN ATTORNEY JODY MICHELLE OSTER 0041391 MEMORANDUM OF DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIMANT ZEF OM AMEN IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME OF THE NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE
  22. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME MOTION OF PLAINTIFF THE ROBERT M. BROWN REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST UA 083017, ROBERT M. BROWN AND NORMAN C. BROWN, CO-TRUSTEES, FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME OF THE NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE 10/16/2024 - DENIED
  23. OTION TO DISMISS FILED MOTION OF DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIMANT ZEF OM AMEN TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT SANDRA MCGEE
  24. NSWER FILED BY P1 THE ROBERT M. BROWN REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST UA 083017 ATTORNEY ROBERT J DUBYAK 0059869 ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM
  25. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS GRANTED TO 8/19/24. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS. DATES AND ORDERS REMAIN AS SET. NOTICE ISSUED
  26. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME MOTION OF PLAINTIFF THE ROBERT M. BROWN REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST UA 083017, ROBERT M. BROWN AND NORMAN C. BROWN, CO-TRUSTEES, FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIM 08/13/2024 - DENIED IN PART
  27. HE COURT GRANTS LEAVE FOR DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS AS FOLLOWS: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DUE ON OR BEFORE 10/18/2024. DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE DUE ON OR BEFORE 11/20/2024. NO REPLY BRIEFS. NOTICE ISSUED
  28. . STANDING ORDERS FOR CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULED DATES: COUNSEL ARE ADVISED AND NOTIFIED THAT THE FOLLOWING STANDING ORDERS SHALL BE IN EFFECT AND ARE BINDING UPON ALL COUNSEL, PARTIES, AND REPRESENTATIVES APPEARING IN MATTERS PENDING BEFORE THE HONORABLE NANCY MARGARET RUSSO. PT/CMC HELD. ALL NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY TO BE COMPLETED ON OR BEFORE 10/15/2024. THE COURT GRANTS LEAVE FOR DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS. SEE SEPARATE ENTRY. FINAL PRETRIAL SET 11/25/2024 AT 2:00PM TRIAL SET 12/09/2024 AT 10:00AM. IN AN EFFORT TO EXTEND COURTESY TO ALL PARTIES AND TO ENSURE THE EFFICIENT ADMINISTRATION OF CASES, THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. ATTENDANCE AT SETTLEMENT CONFERENCES AND FINAL PRETRIALS: IN THE ABSENCE OF PRIOR COURT APPROVAL, THE FOLLOWING PERSONS MUST BE PERSONALLY PRESENT WITH FULL SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY AT THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, FINAL PRETRIAL AND ONE-HALF HOUR BEFORE THE TRIAL FOR A FINAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD, ALL NAMED PARTIES AND INSUREDS, ADJUSTORS AND REPRESENTATIVES. IF A PARTY IS A CORPORATION OR GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY, THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THAT CORPORATION OR ENTITY (OTHER THAN COUNSEL OF RECORD) WITH FULL SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY (AUTHORITY TO SETTLE UP TO THE DEMAND SUBMITTED BY THE PLAINTIFF IN HIS/HER DEMAND LETTER; FOR A DESCRIPTION OF DEMAND LETTERS, SEE STANDING ORDERS FOR FINAL PRETRIALS BELOW). IF ANY PARTY REQUIRES APPROVAL BY AN INSURER OR ANOTHER TO SETTLE, THEN THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE INSURER, OR THE PERSON WHOSE APPROVAL IS NEEDED, MUST APPEAR, WITH FULL SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY. NAMED INSUREDS MUST BE PRESENT, REGARDLESS OF ANY POLICY LANGUAGE THAT STATES THEIR APPROVAL IS NOT NECESSARY. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL, JUDGMENT OR SANCTIONS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE COURT. SEE REPP V. HORTON (1974), 44 OHIO APP. 2D 63; SEE ALSO LOCAL RULE 21, GENERAL DIVISION, CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. THE COURT WILL CONSIDER REQUESTS FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE ONLY UPON RECEIPT OF A WRITTEN MOTION. ANY SUCH MOTION MUST BE FILED, SUPPORTED BY GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, AND DELIVERED TO THE COURT AND OPPOSING COUNSEL NO LESS THAN 14 DAYS BEFORE THE SCHEDULED EVENT. 2. PRESENCE AT TRIAL: ALL NAMED PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD MUST BE PERSONALLY PRESENT FOR AND THROUGHOUT TRIAL UNLESS THE COURT HAS GRANTED A WRITTEN MOTION REQUESTING THE NONAPPEARANCE OF ANY COUNSEL OR PARTY. ANY SUCH MOTION MUST BE FILED, SUPPORTED BY GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, AND DELIVERED TO THE COURT AND OPPOSING COUNSEL NO LESS THAN 14 DAYS BEFORE THE SCHEDULED TRIAL DATE. DELIVERY TO THE COURT AND OPPOSING COUNSEL MAY BE MADE BY FAX. ADDITIONALLY, THE COURT WILL CONDUCT A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ONE-HALF HOUR BEFORE TRIAL. ALL PARTIES, COUNSEL, NAMED INSUREDS, ADJUSTORS, AND REPRESENTATIVES ARE TO BE PERSONALLY PRESENT WITH FULL SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH SCHEDULED DEADLINES AND DATES: DATES FOR A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, FINAL PRETRIAL, TRIAL, NONEXPERT AND EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES ARE SET AT THE PT/CMC, WITH ALL COUNSEL PRESENT. COUNSEL MAY NOT STIPULATE TO ALTER ANY DEADLINE OR DATE SET BY THE COURT. 4. REQUESTS FOR EXTENSION/CONTINUANCE: ANY REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF ANY MATTER, INCLUDING ANY SCHEDULED PRETRIAL, SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, FINAL PRETRIAL AND/OR TRIAL MUST BE MADE BY MOTION, SUPPORTED BY GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, AND FILED AND DELIVERED TO THE COURT AND OPPOSING COUNSEL NO LESS THAN 14 DAYS BEFORE THE SCHEDULED EVENT. COUNSEL MAY PERFECT THIS SERVICE BY FAXING A TIME-STAMPED COPY OF THE MOTION TO THE COURT (216-348-4036) AND OPPOSING COUNSEL ON THE DATE OF FILING. ANY REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL MUST BE SIGNED BY THE CLIENT, COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULE 17 AND CONTAIN A COPY OF THE POSTCARD OR DOCKET SETTING ANY PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED TRIAL DATE. NO CONTINUANCE CAN BE CONSIDERED WITHOUT THIS INFORMATION. REQUESTS FOR A DISCOVERY EXTENSION, REQUESTS FOR A CONTINUANCE OF A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE OR FINAL PRETRIAL, OR TO EXCUSE ANY PERSON FROM ATTENDING A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, FINAL PRETRIAL OR TRIAL, MUST BE MADE BY MOTION, NO LESS THAN 14 DAYS BEFORE THE DISCOVERY CUTOFF, SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, FINAL PRETRIAL OR TRIAL. THE COURT WILL ENTERTAIN ORAL MOTIONS FOR CONTINUANCES, ACCELERATIONS OR EXTENSIONS, ONLY IN MATTERS OF EMERGENCY OR UNUSUAL SITUATIONS. 5. ABSENT AN EMERGENCY OR UNUSUAL SITUATION, THE COURT WILL NOT ENTERTAIN MOTIONS TO CONTINUE OR EXCUSE APPEARANCE NOT MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS ORDER. 6. ABSENT A RULING ON ANY PENDING MOTION, ALL DATES AND ORDERS REMAIN AS SET. 7. STIPULATIONS: CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE CIVIL RULES AND LOCAL RULE 8(C), THIS COURT WILL NOT CONSIDER OR SIGN STIPULATIONS FOR LEAVE TO PLEAD FOR ANY MATTER, OTHER THAN FOR AN INITIAL LEAVE TO RESPOND TO A COMPLAINT OR COUNTERCLAIM. 8. PROTECTIVE ORDERS/MOTIONS TO QUASH: CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CIVIL RULE 26(C), ANY COUNSEL SEEKING A PROTECTIVE ORDER MUST FIRST MAKE A REASONABLE EFFORT TO RESOLVE THE MATTER WITH THE ATTORNEY OR UNREPRESENTED PARTY SEEKING DISCOVERY. ANY MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER MUST ALSO CONTAIN A STATEMENT RECITING THE EFFORTS MADE TO RESOLVE THE MATTER. FURTHER, WRITTEN MOTIONS FOR PROTECTIVE ORDERS AND/OR MOTIONS TO QUASH MUST BE TIMELY FILED AND COURTESY COPIES HAND-DELIVERED OR FAXED TO THE COURT AND OPPOSING COUNSEL DURING NORMAL WORKING HOURS, ON THE DAY OF FILING. FAILURE TO FULLY COMPLY MAY RESULT IN A DENIAL OF A MOTION AND/OR SANCTIONS, WHERE DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE COURT. THE COURT WILL ENDEAVOR TO CONDUCT A PRETRIAL TO RESOLVE THE MATTER, WITHIN 48 HOURS OF RECEIPT. 9. COURTESY COPIES: COURTESY COPIES OF ALL PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS MUST BE DELIVERED TO THE OFFICE OF JUDGE NANCY MARGARET RUSSO, ON THE DATE OF FILING. THE COURT DOES NOT REQUIRE COPIES OF PAPER DISCOVERY REQUESTS OR RESPONSES. 10. FAX NUMBERS: THIS COURT REGULARLY FAXES ORDERS AND DECISIONS, IN ORDER TO TIMELY INFORM COUNSEL OF MATTERS PERTAINING TO THE CASE. THEREFORE, COUNSEL ARE REQUESTED TO PROVIDE THIS COURT WITH THEIR FAX NUMBERS, BY PLACING SAME ON PLEADINGS FILED WITH JUDGE NANCY MARGARET RUSSO. THE COURT'S FAX NUMBER IS 216-348-4036. THIS COURT RETAINS JURISDICTION OVER ALL POST-JUDGMENT MOTIONS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, MOTIONS TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT, MOTIONS TO VACATE, MOTIONS TO COMPEL, MOTIONS FOR COSTS OR ATTORNEY FEES, AND/OR MOTIONS FOR SANCTIONS. II. STANDING ORDERS FOR FINAL PRETRIALS: 1) EXCHANGE OF DEMAND AND OFFER: CONSIDERATION OF SETTLEMENT IS A SERIOUS MATTER, WHICH WARRANTS THOROUGH PREPARATION. THE FINAL PRETRIAL IS MOST LIKELY TO BE PRODUCTIVE IF THE PARTIES HAVE CLEARLY COMMUNICATED THEIR SETTLEMENT POSITIONS. THEREFORE, PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL IS ORDERED TO SERVE UPON DEFENDANT(S) COUNSEL, AND THE COURT VIA FAX AT (216) 348-4036, ON OR BEFORE 11/08/2024, A LETTER WHICH CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING: A) A BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES WHICH THE PLAINTIFF(S) ASSERTS SUPPORTS THE LIABILITY OF THE DEFENDANT(S); B) A BRIEF EXPLANATION OF WHY PLAINTIFF WILL PREVAIL AT TRIAL, AND WHY DAMAGES OR OTHER RELIEF WILL BE AWARDED AT THE CONCLUSION OF TRIAL; C) THE SETTLEMENT DEMAND; AND D) A BRIEF EXPLANATION OF THE RATIONALE BEHIND THE DEMAND; INCLUDING AN ITEMIZATION OF DAMAGES. DEFENDANT(S) COUNSEL IS ORDERED TO SERVE UPON PLAINTIFF(S) COUNSEL, AND THE COURT VIA FAX AT (216) 348-4036, ON OR BEFORE 11/18/2024, A RESPONSIVE LETTER WHICH STATES THE FOLLOWING: A) ANY POINTS IN PLAINTIFF(S) LETTER, WITH WHICH THE DEFENDANT(S) AGREE; B) ANY POINTS IN PLAINTIFF(S) LETTER, WITH WHICH THE DEFENDANT(S) DISAGREE; C) A SETTLEMENT OFFER; AND D) A BRIEF EXPLANATION OF THE RATIONALE BEHIND THE OFFER INCLUDING AN ITEMIZATION FOR EACH COMPONENT OF DAMAGES IDENTIFIED BY THE PLAINTIFF. COPIES OF THESE LETTERS ARE NOT TO BE FILED WITH THE CLERK, AS THEY ARE TO BE USED SOLELY TO FACILITATE DISCUSSION AND RESOLUTION OF THE CASE. THE LETTERS ARE INADMISSIBLE AT TRIAL. 2) PROCEDURE: THE COURT EXPECTS THE ATTORNEYS, PARTIES, ADJUSTORS, AND PARTY REPRESENTATIVES TO BE FULLY PREPARED TO PARTICIPATE IN FINAL PRETRIAL DISCUSSIONS. THE COURT ENCOURAGES ALL PARTIES TO FAIRLY ASSESS THEIR POSITIONS AND EXPLORE CREATIVE MEANS FOR RESOLVING THE CASE. 3) STATEMENTS INADMISSIBLE: THE WRITTEN EXCHANGES, DEMANDS AND OFFERS REQUIRED BY THIS ORDER, AND ANY STATEMENTS MADE BY ANY PERSON DURING SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS OR THE FINAL PRETRIAL, ARE NOT ADMISSIBLE AT TRIAL. THE COURT EXPECTS ALL PERSONS TO ADDRESS EACH OTHER WITH COURTESY AND RESPECT, AND ALSO ENCOURAGES A FRANK AND HONEST DISCUSSION OF THE CASE, WITH A GOAL TOWARDS RESOLUTION. 4) ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION AT THE FINAL PRETRIAL: ALL PARTIES, REPRESENTATIVES AND COUNSEL MUST BE PREPARED TO DISCUSS: A) EACH PARTY'S OBJECTIVES IN THE LITIGATION; B) THE ISSUES REQUIRING RESOLUTION; C) THE STRENGTHS/WEAKNESSES OF EACH PARTY'S RESPECTIVE POSITIONS; D) THE POINTS OF AGREEMENT/DISAGREEMENT AMONG THE PARTIES; BOTH FACTUAL AND/OR LEGAL; E) IMPEDIMENTS TO SETTLEMENT; AND F) POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS FOR RESOLUTION OF THE CASE. COUNSEL HAVE BEEN PROVIDED A COPY OF THIS ORDER AND ARE DIRECTED TO PROVIDE COPIES AND DISCUSS SAME WITH THEIR CLIENTS. THE COURT REQUIRES A COURTESY COPY OF ALL PLEADINGS BE DELIVERED TO CHAMBERS IN 18C ON THE DATE OF FILING; THE USE OF E-FILING DOES NOT SUPERSEDE THE STANDING ORDERS OF THE COURT; FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ANY PORTION OF THE STANDING ORDERS MAY RESULT IN A DWOP. TRIAL ORDERS ISSUED OSJ TO:. NOTICE ISSUED
  29. RIAL SET FOR 12/09/2024 AT 10:00 AM. (Notice Sent).
  30. INAL PRETRIAL SET FOR 11/25/2024 AT 02:00 PM. (Notice Sent).
  31. MC HELD BY PHONE. PARTIES APPEAR THROUGH COUNSEL. TRIAL ORDERS ISSUED OSJ. NOTICE ISSUED
  32. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JODY MICHELLE OSTER
  33. NSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM $75 ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS OF DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIMANT ZEF OM AMEN
  34. UGGESTION OF DEATH FILED BY D1 ZEF OM AMEN ATTORNEY JODY MICHELLE OSTER 0041391 SUGGESTION OF DEATH OF DEFENDANT SANDRA MCGEE
  35. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53915902 RETURNED 06/26/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT AMEN/ZEF/OM - ATTEMPTED NOT KNOWN NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  36. TIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO PLEAD ACCEPTED TO 7/16/24 ONLY. PT/CMC TO PROCEED AS ORDERED. NOTICE ISSUED
  37. TIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO PLEAD FILED STIPULATION TO MOVE OR PLEAD PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 8.0(D)
  38. OTICE OF APPEARANCE, FILED DEFENDANT(S) ZEF OM AMEN(D1) and SANDRA MCGEE(D2) JODY MICHELLE OSTER 0041391. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS ZEF OM AMEN AND SANDRA MCGEE
  39. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53915903 RETURNED 6/26/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT MCGEE/SANDRA/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  40. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53915902 RETURNED 6/26/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT AMEN/ZEF/OM - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  41. EGULAR MAIL SERVICE RECEIPT NO. 53913207 RETURNED 06/24/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT MCGEE/SANDRA/ NO SUCH NUMBER NOTICE MAILED TO PLTFS ATTORNEY. $0.00
  42. EGULAR MAIL SERVICE RECEIPT NO. 53913206 RETURNED 06/24/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT AMEN/ZEF/OM NO SUCH NUMBER NOTICE MAILED TO PLTFS ATTORNEY. $0.00
  43. MC BY PHONE SET FOR 07/16/2024 AT 01:30 PM THIS CASE IS SET FOR A PRETRIAL/CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL INFORM ALL OPPOSING COUNSEL AND/OR PRO SE PARTIES OF THIS DATE AND TIME. COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO BE PRESENT AND TO BE FAMILIAR WITH THE UNDERLYING FACTS OF THE CASE. PARTIES NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL ARE ALSO REQUIRED TO BE PRESENT. FAILURE OF ANY PARTY'S COUNSEL OR PRO SE PARTY TO APPEAR AT ANY SCHEDULED EVENT DURING THE PENDENCY OF THIS CASE MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND/OR JUDGMENT BEING RENDERED. IF A CONTINUANCE IS SOUGHT FOR ANY REASON, THE APPROPRIATE MOTION MUST BE FILED NO LESS THAN 7 DAYS BEFORE THE SCHEDULED EVENT, AND THE COURT PROVIDED WITH A COURTESY COPY ON THE DATE OF FILING. DO NOT CALL THE COURT TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE. NO CONSIDERATION WILL BE GIVEN TO REQUESTS NOT MADE IN WRITING, DOCKETED AND WITHIN THE TIMEFRAME ABOVE, ABSENT AN EMERGENCY. THE COURT REQUIRES A COURTESY COPY OF ALL PLEADINGS IN EXCESS OF 5 PAGES, TO BE MAILED OR HAND-DELIVERED TO THE COURT. E-FILING DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A COURTESY COPY. PLEADINGS OF 5 PAGES OR LESS THAT ARE E-FILED DO NOT NEED TO BE DELIVERED TO THE COURT. PARTIES WISHING TO PERFECT SERVICE BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER IN ANY GIVEN CASE MUST FIRST FILE A SEPARATE MOTION TO APPOINT A SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER DIRECTLY WITH JUDGE NANCY MARGARET RUSSO. FAILURE TO OBTAIN THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF JUDGE NANCY MARGARET RUSSO BEFORE ATTEMPTING SERVICE BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER MAY RESULT IN THE COURT STRIKING SUCH SERVICE ATTEMPTS. MOTIONS TO APPOINT SPECIAL PROCESS SERVERS MUST HAVE A PROPOSED ORDER ATTACHED TO THE MOTION FOR THE COURT'S REVIEW AND SIGNATURE. (THE PROPOSED ORDER MAY ALSO BE SENT ADDITIONALLY AS A WORD DOCUMENT). THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE WILL BE HELD BY PHONE UNLESS OTHERWISE DOCKETED. THE PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO JOIN ONE LINE AND THEN CALL THE STAFF ATTORNEY AT 216.698.2666 AT THE TIME OF THE HEARING OR PROVIDE A CONFERENCE NUMBER IN ADVANCE. IF THE CALL IS UNANSWERED, THE PARTIES SHOULD CONTINUE TO CALL UNTIL THE COURT IS ABLE TO ANSWER. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ANY PORTION OF THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS, INCLUDING THIS ORDER, MAY RESULT IN A DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE, JUDGMENT OR OTHER SANCTIONS. PARTIES ARE TO ABIDE BY THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS CONTAINED HEREIN AND LOCATED AT: HTTPS://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/COURT-RESOURCES/JUDGES/JUDGE-NANCY-MARGARET-RUSSO NOTICE ISSUED
  44. EGULAR MAIL SERVICE TO DEFENDANT ZEF OM AMEN (D1) STRICKEN AS USPS CERTIFIED MAIL RETURNED AS NO SUCH NUMBER. REGULAR MAIL SERVICE AS TO DEFENDANT SANDRA MCGEE (D2) STRICKEN AS USPS CERTIFIED MAIL RETURNED AS UNCLAIMED/ UNABLE TO FORWARD. CERTIFIED MAIL ISSUED ON 05/28/2024 NOT RETURNED BY USPS. PLAINTIFF ORDERED TO REISSUE SERVICE TO BOTH DEFENDANTS AT VALID, CURRENT ADDRESSES BY CERTIFIED MAIL, SHERIFF OR THIRD PARTY CARRIER WITH SIGNATURE REQUIRED ON OR BEFORE 06/28/2024. SPECIAL PROCESS SERVICE REQUIRES A SEPARATE MOTION TO THIS COURT. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER WILL RESULT IN DWOP. ALL DATES AND ORDERS REMAIN AS SET. NOTICE ISSUED
  45. MC BY PHONE SET FOR 07/16/2024 AT 01:30 PM. (Notice Sent).
  46. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53665731 RETURNED 05/24/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT AMEN/ZEF/OM - NO SUCH NUMBER NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  47. UMS COMPLAINT(53915903) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: SANDRA MCGEE 1420 LAKESHORE AVENUE APT. 16 OAKLAND, CA 94606-0000
  48. UMS COMPLAINT(53915902) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: ZEF OM AMEN 1420 LAKESHORE AVENUE APT 16 OAKLAND, CA 94606-0000
  49. UMS COMPLAINT(53913207) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: SANDRA MCGEE 1440 LAKESHORE AVENUE APT. 16 OAKLAND, CA 94606 ANSWER DATE: 06/25/2024
  50. UMS COMPLAINT(53913206) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: ZEF OM AMEN 1440 LAKESHORE AVENUE APT. 16 OAKLAND, CA 94606 ANSWER DATE: 06/25/2024
  51. RIT FEE
  52. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  53. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  54. RIT FEE
  55. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  56. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  57. RIT FEE
  58. RIT FEE
  59. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE BY REGULAR MAIL
  60. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE BY CERTIFIED MAIL
  61. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53665732 RETURNED 5/24/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT MCGEE/SANDRA/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  62. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53665731 RETURNED 5/24/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT AMEN/ZEF/OM - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  63. UMS COMPLAINT(53665732) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: SANDRA MCGEE 1440 LAKESHORE AVENUE APT. 16 OAKLAND, CA 94606
  64. UMS COMPLAINT(53665731) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: ZEF OM AMEN 1440 LAKESHORE AVENUE APT. 16 OAKLAND, CA 94606
  65. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  66. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  67. RIT FEE
  68. RIT FEE
  69. UDGE NANCY MARGARET RUSSO ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  70. EGAL RESEARCH
  71. EGAL NEWS
  72. EGAL AID
  73. OURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  74. OMPUTER FEE
  75. LERK'S FEE
  76. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DUBYAK NELSON, LLC

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more