Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Ingham County

Court

Ingham County

Michigan

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-04-03
Status CLOSED
Docket 32 entries
Disposition judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Angel Reveles
Defendant Evelyn Oregon
Photo of Hon. Wanda Stokes

Judge

Hon. Wanda Stokes

Ingham County (MI)

Michigan

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. C30 ELECTRONIC SYSTEM FEE RECEIPT: 520894 DATE: 04/03/2024
  2. WRIT RECEIPT: 543319 DATE: 12/04/2025
  3. REQUEST AND WRIT FOR GARNISHMENT - NONPERIODIC - CASE CREDIT UNION
  4. REQUEST AND WRIT FOR GARNISHMENT - NONPERIODIC - CHASE BANK
  5. REQUEST AND WRIT FOR GARNISHMENT - NONPERIODIC - ASTERA CREDIT UNION
  6. REQUEST AND WRIT FOR GARNISHMENT - NONPERIODIC - PNC BANK
  7. MOTION FEE RECEIPT: 542636 DATE: 11/14/2025
  8. ORDER DENYING EX PARTE MOTION
  9. ORDER VACATING NOTICE OF JUDGMENT LIEN
  10. EX PARTE MOTION FILED BY NON PARTY ALL INCLUSIVE CONSULTING AND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC FOR SUMMARY DISPOSITION AND TO QUASH WRONGFULLY AFFILIATED JUDGMENT LEIN
  11. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT LIEN CERTIFICATION FEE RECEIPT: 528160 DATE: 10/15/2024
  12. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT LIEN FILED IN COUNTY OF INGHAM
  13. GARNISHMENT DISCLOSURE
  14. REQUEST AND WRIT FOR GARNISHMENT (NON PERIODIC) AGST EVELYN OREGON IN THE AMOUNT OF $97,000.00
  15. WRIT RECEIPT: 523397 DATE: 05/31/2024
  16. AFFIDAVIT AND NOTICE OF ENTRY OF FOREIGN JUDGMENT W/ PS RECEIPT: 520894 DATE: 04/03/2024 JUDGEMENT DATE: 12/12/22 AMOUNT: $97,000.00
  17. CASE CLOSED C30
  18. L REQUEST FOR HEARING ON MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT OR RECONSIDERATION OF THIS COURTS JUNE 20, 2024 ORDER WITH PS
  19. ISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE FROM DEF MARK VERDUSCO #613933
  20. RDER RE; DEFAULT JUDGMENT SUM CERTAIN REQUEST W/ DEFAULT ENTRY ATTACHED
  21. UBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS AS TO WARDAN ADAM DOUGLAS, W/COVER LETTER AND ENVELOPE
  22. ISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE- RETURN SLIP RE: DEFAULT REQUEST AND ENTRY
  23. ROOF OF SERVICE RE: EXHIBITS SERVED UPON MARK VERDUSCO ON 04/15/2024- GREEN CARD ATTACHED
  24. UMMONS ISSUED
  25. NTERED IN ERROR
  26. RDER OF SUSPENSION OF TOTAL INITIAL PAYMENT AS TO PLAINTIFF MICHAEL KUZMA
  27. OTION AND VERIFICATION FOR ALTERNATE SERVICE
  28. RDER FOR INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM FEE PAYMENT AS TO PLAINTIFF MICHAEL KUZMA
  29. RDER WAIVING JURY FEE
  30. OMPLAINT FILED RECEIPT: 526294 DATE: 08/21/2024 RECEIPT: 530241 DATE: 12/17/2024 RECEIPT: 532017 DATE: 02/12/2025 RECEIPT: 532027 DATE: 02/12/2025 RECEIPT: 532963 DATE: 03/10/2025 RECEIPT: 533282 DATE: 03/18/2025
  31. EMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
  32. 30 ELECTRONIC SYSTEM FEE RECEIPT: 522784 DATE: 05/16/2024 RECEIPT: 523991 DATE: 06/17/2024 RECEIPT: 526294 DATE: 08/21/2024

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more