Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2024-03-19
Status CLOSED
Type Civil Austintown
Docket 32 entries
Disposition judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Cavalry Spv I, Llc
Defendant Olinger, Wayne
Photo of Hon. Hunter Scott D

Judge

Hon. Hunter Scott D

Mahoning County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CONTRACT- SUM OF $1,097.42 PLUS INTEREST AT 8% FROM THE JUDGMENT DATE AND COURT COSTS Receipt: 428755 Date: 03/19/2024
  2. Issue Date: 03/19/2024 Service: SUMMONS ISSUED Method: (A) CERTIFIED MAIL Cost Per: $0.00 OLINGER, WAYNE 11241 MAHONING AVE NORTH JACKSON, OH 44451 Tracking No: 941472669904221890261
  3. SUCCESSFUL SERVICE Method : (A) CERTIFIED MAIL Issued : 03/19/2024 Service : SUMMONS ISSUED Served : 03/25/2024 Return : 03/27/2024 On : OLINGER, WAYNE Signed By : WAYNE OLINGER Reason : (A) SUCCESSFUL SERVICE Comment : Tracking # : 941472669904221890261
  4. ANSWER FILED BY DEFENDANT PRO SE
  5. HEARING SCHEDULED Event: CIVIL PRE TRIAL Date: 06/28/2024 Time: 9:45 am Judge: DESANTO, DONALD Location: COUNTY COURT # 4
  6. $125.00
  7. $0.00
  8. $0.00
  9. PRE-TRIAL HELD ON THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF PRESENT (ATTY KATHLEEN M SMITH) APPEARED LAST DUE TO A HEARING CONFLICT. DEFENDANT PRESENT. DISCOVERY TO BE COMPLETED IN 60 DAYS. DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS, IF ANY, FILOED IN 90 DAYS. TRIAL TO BENCH. SET BENCH TRIAL FOR 120 DAYS. /S/MAGISTRATE DONALD J DESANTO
  10. LEAVE TO FILE SUMMARY JUDGMENT GRANTED. /S/DJD /S/JUDGE SCOTT D HUNTER
  11. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED BY Attorney: SARVER, EDEN (74919)
  12. HEARING SCHEDULED Event: NON-ORAL HEARING - MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Date: 08/09/2024 Time: 11:00 am Judge: DESANTO, DONALD Location: COUNTY COURT # 4
  13. NOTICE OF NON ORAL HEARING SENT TO ATTY ERIN ENDERLE AND WAYNE OLINGER
  14. HEARING SCHEDULED-CANCELLED/ENTRY FILED Event: CIVIL TRIAL Date: 11/01/2024 Time: 11:00 am Judge: DESANTO, DONALD Location: COUNTY COURT # 4 Result: JOURNAL ENTRY FILED
  15. NOTICE OF CIVIL TRIAL SENT TO ATTY ERIN ENDERLE AND WAYNE OLINGER
  16. DISCOVERY FILED BY DEFENDANT
  17. ENTRY: THE WITHIN CAUSE HAVING COME ON BEFORE THE COURT ON MOTION OF THE PLAINTIFF FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AFTER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY THE OHIO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND IT APPEARING UPON THE EXAMINATION OF THE RECORDS THAT HERE APPEARS TO BE NO GENUINE ISSUE OF FACT AND THE COURT BEING OTHERWISE SUFFICIENTLY ADVISED; THE DEFENDANT HAVING FILED NO RESPONSE AS PER CIVIL RULE 56 (E); NOW THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT CAVALRY SPV I LLC MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE AND IT IS HEREBY SUSTAINED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT THE PLAINTIFF , CAVALRY SPV I LLC RECOVER OF THE DEFENDANT WAYNE OLINGER, A JUDGMENT IN THE SUM OF ONE THOUSAND NINETY-SEVEN AND 41/100 DOLLARS ($1,097.42) PLUS INTERST AT 8% PER ANNUM FROM THE DATE OF JUDGMENT AND THE COURT COSTS OF THIS ACTION, FOR ALL OF WHICH EXECUTION MAY BE ISSUED AS PROVIDED BY LAW. THE PARTIES HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPEAL THIS JUDGMENT. THE CLERK SHALL NOTIFY ALL PARTIES OF THE JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO CIV R. 58. THERE IS NO JUST REASON FOR DELAY. IT IS SO ORDERED. /S/DJD /S/JUDGE SCOTT D HUNTER
  18. CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT FILED Attorney: ENDERLE ESQ, ERIN (81407) Receipt: 440629 Date: 11/08/2024
  19. CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT ISSUED CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT Sent on: 11/08/2024 14:12:50.29
  20. CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT RETURNED FILED: 2024 JD 01994 JUDGMENT DOCKET 329 PAGE 139
  21. SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT FILED BY Attorney: KLEMENOK, KIMBERLY A (69046)
  22. $125.00
  23. $0.00
  24. $0.00
  25. $0.00
  26. $0.00
  27. $0.00
  28. $0.00
  29. $0.00
  30. $5.00
  31. $0.00
  32. $0.00

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase