Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Millford County

Court

Millford County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-04-22
Type H 00 Housing Summary Process
Docket 42 entries
Disposition judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Frederick M. Grasic
Defendant Sharon A. Grasic|John F. Grasic
Photo of Hon. Barry Stevens

Judge

Hon. Barry Stevens

Connecticut

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. HOUSING SUMMARY PROCESS SUMMONS (JD-HM-32)
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. NOTICE TO QUIT POSSESSION - ORIGINAL SUMMARY PROCESS
  4. RETURN OF SERVICE
  5. ETURN OF SERVICE
  6. OUSING SUMMARY PROCESS SUMMONS (JD-HM-32) Corrected
  7. OTION FOR DEFAULT FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR AND JUDGMENT OF POSSESSION SUMMARY PROCESS
  8. OTION FOR JUDGMENT OF DEFAULT FOR FAILURE TO PLEAD AND POSSESSION SUMMARY PROCESS RESULT: Denied 6/5/2024 HON H HALL
  9. RDER RESULT: Denied 6/5/2024 HON H HALL
  10. FFIDAVIT CARES act
  11. NSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE AND COUNTERCLAIM
  12. XHIBITS Attachment to Entry #105.00 Answer and Special Defense and Counterclaim filed 6/12/2024
  13. OTION TO STRIKE re: Entry #105.00 RESULT: Off 9/28/2024 HON BARRY STEVENS
  14. RDER RESULT: Off 9/28/2024 HON BARRY STEVENS
  15. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE
  16. RDER RESULT: Granted 6/27/2024 HON ARTHUR HILLER
  17. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Granted 8/20/2024 HON THEODORE TYMA
  18. RDER RESULT: Granted 8/20/2024 HON THEODORE TYMA
  19. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Granted 8/29/2024 HON JASON WELCH
  20. RDER RESULT: Granted 8/29/2024 HON JASON WELCH
  21. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) re: Entry #110.00
  22. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE Hearing Motion to Strike RESULT: Granted 9/25/2024 HON BARRY STEVENS
  23. RDER RESULT: Granted 9/25/2024 HON BARRY STEVENS
  24. OTION FOR USE AND OCCUPANCY PAYMENTS SUMMARY PROCESS
  25. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) RESULT: Granted 9/28/2024 HON BARRY STEVENS
  26. RDER RESULT: Granted 9/28/2024 HON BARRY STEVENS
  27. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE Motion to Strike RESULT: Order 10/7/2024 HON BARRY STEVENS
  28. RDER RESULT: Order 10/7/2024 HON BARRY STEVENS
  29. BJECTION Continuance at Entry 115.00 RESULT: Order 10/7/2024 HON BARRY STEVENS
  30. RDER RESULT: Order 10/7/2024 HON BARRY STEVENS
  31. RDER RESULT: Order 10/7/2024 HON BARRY STEVENS
  32. EPLY TO SPECIAL DEFENSE AND ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM And special defenses.
  33. UDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF- DEFENDANT FAILED TO APPEAR AT TRIAL RESULT: HON BARRY STEVENS
  34. RDER RESULT: Order 11/13/2024 HON BARRY STEVENS
  35. UMMARY PROCESS EXECUTION FILED
  36. XECUTION FOR POSSESSION ISSUED SUMMARY PROCESS
  37. PPLICATION FOR INJUNCTION (AUDITA QUERELA) Sharon Grasic RESULT: Denied 1/2/2025 HON EDWARD GRAZIANI Last Updated: Result Information - 01/02/2025
  38. RDER RESULT: Denied 1/2/2025 HON EDWARD GRAZIANI Last Updated: Result Information - 01/02/2025
  39. BJECTION Re Audita Querela RESULT: Sustained 1/2/2025 HON EDWARD GRAZIANI Last Updated: Result Information - 01/02/2025
  40. UMMARY PROCESS EXECUTION FILED
  41. XECUTION FOR POSSESSION ISSUED SUMMARY PROCESS
  42. XECUTION RETURNED UNSATISFIED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more