Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Johnson County District Court

Court

Johnson County District Court

Kansas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-03-26
Status PENDING
Type Intentional Tort
Docket 36 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Somers, Jessica
Defendant Somer, Ryan|Holcomb, Samantha|Ladatto, Mindy|Ladatto, Mindy
Photo of Hon. K Christopher Jayaram

Judge

Hon. K Christopher Jayaram

Johnson County (KS)

Kansas

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SCHED. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE on 06/18/24,11:30am,Div 12
  2. FILE STAMP 04/19/24, JOURNAL ENTRY (APRIL 18,2024)
  3. <******* Bench Notes *********> CASE CALLED, AND PARTIES APPEAR WITH COUNSEL. COURT TAKE UP FIRST, DEFENDANT SOMERS AND HOLCOMB'S MOTION FOR CHANGE OF JUDGE, PER 20-311D. BEINGN DULY ADVISED, MOTION IS HEREBY DENIED, AS STATED ON RECORD. COURT THEREAFTER TAKES UP P'S MOTION FOR TI, AS IT RELATES TO SOMERS/HOLCOMB PARTIES REPORT CONSENT TI ON ISSUES. COURT ORDERS PARTIES TO SCHEDULE A CMC WITH DOV 12 AA WITHIN 45 DAYS AND TO SUBMIT A CMO, IF AGREED, PRIOR. IF AGREED CMO IS SUBMITTED PRIOR TO CMC, CONFERENCE WILL BE CANCELLED BY CONSENT. MR. LAWSON TO PREPARE JE ON TI AND SCHEDULE CMC. CMO FROM DIV 12 TAB ON WEBSITE.(RPTR: NORMAN)(JUDGE: JAYARAM)
  4. FILE STAMP 04/16/24, MOTION FOR CHANGE OF JUDGE PURSUANT TO KSA 20-3114
  5. FILE STAMP 04/12/24, NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PROPOSED JOURNAL ENTRY PURSUANT TO KANSAS SUPREME COURT RULE 170
  6. FILE STAMP 04/12/24, NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PROPOSED JOURNAL ENTRY PURSUANT TO KANSAS SUPREME COURT RULE 170
  7. FILE STAMP 04/12/24, AMENDED ORDER FOR CLERKS 14-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME
  8. FILE STAMP 04/12/24, AMENDED ANSWER AND JURY DEMAND OF DEFENDANTS RYAN SOMERS AND SAMANTHA HOLCOMB
  9. FILE STAMP 04/12/24, ORDER FOR CLERKS 14-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME
  10. FILE STAMP 04/12/24, MOTION OF MINDY LADATTO FOR CLERK'S 14 DAY EXTENSION
  11. FILE STAMP 04/11/24, ANSWER AND JURY DEMAND OF DEFENDANTS RYAN SOMERS AND SAMANTHA HOLCOMB
  12. ELECTRONIC ENTRY OF APPEARANCE BY CHRISTOPHER EDWARD BENJAMIN AS A DEFENSE ATTORNEY FOR RYAN SOMER; SAMANTHA HOLCOMB; MINDY LADATTO
  13. FILE STAMP 04/09/24, NOTICE OF HEARING
  14. SCHED. MOTION on 04/18/24,02:30pm,Div 12
  15. <******* Bench Notes *********> CASE CALLED AND PLAINTIFF APPEARS WITH COUNSEL AND DEFENDANT LADATTO APPEARS THROUGH COUNSEL. NO OTHER APPEARANCES. COURT TAKES UP REQUEST TO EXTEND TRO AGAINST DEFENDANTS SOMERS AND HOLCOLMB. BEING DULY ADVISED, COURT FINDS GOOD CAUSE FOR EXTENSION TO 4/23.24. COURT WILL TAKE UP PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TI ON 4/18/24 AT 2:30 PM IN PERSON IN D12. MR. LAWSON TO PREPARE JE AND ISSUE NOH AND SERVE SAME.(RPTR: CAREY)(JUDGE: JAYARAM)
  16. FILE STAMP 04/08/24, NOTICE OF HEARING
  17. SCHED. MOTION on 04/09/24,01:30pm,Div 12
  18. FILE STAMP 04/05/24, PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXTEND THE EXPIRATION OF THE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER FOR DEFENDANT SAMANTHA HOLCOMB AND TO ORDER A TEMPORARY INJUNCTION BY DEFAULT AGAINST RYAN SOMERS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO EXTEND THE EXPIRATION OF THE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
  19. FILE STAMP 04/05/24, AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
  20. FILE STAMP 04/05/24, AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
  21. FILE STAMP 04/05/24, AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
  22. <******* Bench Notes *********> CASE CALLED AND PARTIES, PLAINTIFF AND DEFT, LADATTO APPEAR WITH COUNSEL. DEFENDANTS SOMMERS AND HOLCOMB DO NOT APPEAR AND SERVICE HAS NOT YET BEEN RETURNED. COURT, BY CONSENT OF PARTIES, PROCEEDS ON TI HEARING WITH RESPECT TO DEFT. LADATTO ONLY. TRO REMAINS IN EFFECT AS TO OTHER DEFENDANTS. COURT HEARS EVIDENCE PRESENTED AND CONSIDERS RECORD. COURT TAKES RECESS TO CONSIDER EVIDENCE. COURT RETURNS AND RULES FROM BENCH. TI IS GRANTED AS TO DEFENDANT LADATTO, PENDING FINAL HEARING. BOND WAIVED. SEE JE, WHICH MR. LAWSON IS TO PREPARE.(JUDGE: JAYARAM)
  23. ELECTRONIC ENTRY OF APPEARANCE BY CHRISTOPHER F PICKERING AS A DEFENSE ATTORNEY FOR MINDY LADATTO
  24. FILE STAMP 03/27/24, NOTICE OF HEARING
  25. PETITION, SUMMONS, MOTION AND ORDER ISSUED TO ATTORNEY FOR PROCESS SERVER "MINDY LADATTO" E/S
  26. FILE STAMP 03/26/24, REQUEST AND SERVICE INSTRUCTION FORM (MINDY LADATTO)
  27. PETITION, SUMMONS, MOTION AND ORDER ISSUED TO ATTORNEY FOR PROCESS SERVER "SAMANTHA HOLCOMB" E/S
  28. FILE STAMP 03/26/24, REQUEST AND SERVICE INSTRUCTION FORM ( SAMANTHA HOLCOMB)
  29. PETITION, SUMMONS, MOTION AND ORDER ISSUED TO ATTORNEY FOR PROCESS SERVER "RYAN SOMER" E/S
  30. FILE STAMP 03/26/24, REQUEST AND SERVICE INSTRUCTION FORM (RYAN SOMERS)
  31. FILE STAMP 03/26/24, EX PARTE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
  32. SCHED. MOTION on 03/29/24,09:00am,Div 12
  33. Judge K CHRISTOPHER JAYARAM assigned to case ASSOCIATED CASE
  34. FILE STAMP 03/26/24, VERIFIED MOTION FOR EX PARTE RESTRAINING ORDER AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT
  35. FILE STAMP 03/26/24, PETITION
  36. JUDGE ROBERT WONNELL ASSIGNED TO CASE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more