Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Nevada Supreme Court

Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-04-16
Status Fast Track Briefing in Progress
Type Civil Appeal Family Law Fast Track Child Custody
Docket 30 entries
Photo of Hon. Kunin, Israel

Judge

Hon. Kunin, Israel

Nevada Appellate Court

Nevada

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Filing Fee due for Appeal. (SC)
  2. Filed SEALED Notice of Appeal/Fast Track. Filed certified copy of notice of appeal. (SC)
  3. Issued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. No action will be taken on this matter until filing fee is paid. Due Date: 7 days. (SC)
  4. Filed Appellant's Motion to File Exhibits 1 and 2 to Notice of Compliance with NRAP 24 Under Seal(SC)
  5. Filed Appellant's Notice of Compliance with NRAP 24(SC)
  6. Filed Appellant's Supplemental Notice of Compliance with NRAP 24(SC)
  7. Filed Appellant's Docketing Statement(SC)
  8. Filed Order Granting Motion and Waiving Filing Fee. On April 22, 2024, appellant's counsel filed a notice of compliance with NRAP 24 and a motion for leave to file Exhibits 1 and 2 to the notice under seal. The motion for leave to file the exhibits under seal is granted. The clerk of this court shall file Exhibits 1 and 2, received on May 2, 2024, under seal. On May 2, 2024, appellant filed a supplemental notice of compliance with NRAP 24 that included a district court order entered on May 1, 2024, that granted appellant's motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. In light of the district court's order, no filing fee is due for this appeal. The clerk of this court shall refer this matter to the settlement program. (SC)
  9. Filed Exhibits (copies). Exhibits:1 and 2 (SEALED) (SC)
  10. Issued Notice of Referral to Settlement Program. This appeal may be assigned to the settlement program. Timelines for requesting transcripts and filing briefs are stayed.
  11. Issued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Issued Assignment Notice to NRAP 16 Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Melissa Mangiaracina. (SC)
  12. Filed Respondent's Notice of Disassociation of Counsel(Viloria, Oliphant, Oster & Aman L.L.P. Files a Notice of Disassociation of Counsel, as the Firm is not and has Never Been Attorney of Record for Respondent)(SC)
  13. Filed Order Granting Motion. On June 18, 2024, counsel for respondent filed a notice of disassociation of counsel. The notice is construed as a motion to withdraw as counsel, and the unopposed motion is granted. The clerk of this court shall remove attorneys Raymond E. Oster, James J. Barnes, and Christina Joycelyn Cullen, of the law firm of Viloria, Oliphant, Oster & Aman L.L.P., as counsel for respondent. Respondent shall have 30 days from the date of this order to retain new counsel and cause new counsel to file a notice of appearance with this court. If respondent will not be retaining new counsel, he shall notify this court in writing of that fact within the same time period. The timelines for further settlement proceedings are stayed pending further order of this court. (SC)
  14. Filed Respondent's Notice of Appearance(Marshal S. Willick, Esq., and Trevor M. Creel, Esq., of the WILLICK LAW GROUP, hereby enter their appearance as counsel for the Respondent(SC)
  15. Filed Order Adding Counsel and Resuming Settlement Proceedings. Pursuant to the notice of appearance filed on August 13, 2024, the clerk of this court shall add attorneys Marshal S. Willick and Trevor M. Creel, of Willick Law Group, to the docket as counsel for respondent. As all parties are represented by counsel, settlement proceedings shall resume in this matter. The settlement judge shall file an early case assessment report within 30 days and a final status report within 180 days.(SC)
  16. Filed Corrected Order Resuming Settlement Proceedings. On August 15, 2024, this court entered an order that incorrectly directed the settlement judge to file settlement program status report within 180 days from the of the order. The final settlement program status report shall be filed within 120 days from the date of that order. (SC)
  17. Filed ECAR/Other. The settlement judge requests that this matter be reassigned due to unforeseen circumstances. (SC)
  18. Issued Notice of Mandatory Electronic Filing. All attorneys are required to file electronically. To: Trevor M. Creel. (SC)
  19. Issued Notice: Settlement Judge Reassignment. Issued Amended Notice of Assignment to NRAP 16 Settlement Program. New Settlement Judge: Israel Kunin. (SC)
  20. Filed ECAR/Appropriate for Settlement Program. This case is appropriate for mediation and a settlement conference is scheduled for December 3, 2024, at 9:00 AM. (SC)
  21. Filed Final Report/Other. Settlement Judge reports that a zoom conference would not be productive and that the appeal should move forward. The settlement judge also requests sanctions be imposed against respondent.
  22. Filed Order Removing From Settlement Program/Briefing Reinstated Pursuant to NRAP 3E, and Directing Respondent's Counsel to Show Cause why Sanctions Should not be Imposed. Appellant(s): 14 days transcript request; 60 days fast track statement and appendix; Respondent(s): 21 days from fast track statement to file fast track response. Respondent's counsel shall have 14 days from the date of this order to show cause why the requested sanction should not be imposed against his client. (SC)
  23. Filed Respondent's Objection/Opposition to "Order Removing from Settlement Program, Reinstating Briefing Pursuant to NRAP 3E, and Directing Respondent's Counsel to show Cause why Sanctions Should not be Imposed," Filed December 12, 2024( SC)
  24. Filed Appellant's Motion for the Preparation of Transcripts at County Expense. (STRICKEN PER 12/30/24 ORDER). (SC)
  25. Filed Order Striking Deficient Document. Order Striking Deficient Motion for the Preparation of Transcripts at County Expense. Corrected motion due: 7 days. (SC)
  26. Filed Appellant's Request for Transcript of Proceedings. Transcripts requested: 10/13/17, 07/18/18, 08/18/20, 08/24/23, 09/05/23, 01/22/24, 01/23/24, To Court Reporter: JAVS Recording. (SC)
  27. Filed Appellant's Motion for the Preparation of Transcripts at County Expense. (SC)
  28. Filed Errata Errata to Respondent's Objection/Opposition to "Order Directing Respondent's Counsel to Show Cause Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed," Filed December 12, 2024
  29. Filed Errata Errata to Respondent's Objection/Opposition to "Order Directing Respondent's Counsel to Show Cause Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed," Filed December 12, 2024
  30. Filed Response to Order to Show Cause Respondent's Amended Objection/Opposition to "Order Directing Respondent's Counsel to Show Cause Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed," Filed December 12, 2024

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more